similar to: (no subject)

far as amount of data to transfer, number of files, or the size of any one file. However, in looking at the output of one particular job it looks like it?s just putting out directories when it gets to a new one, and not the filename of everything it?s transferring. And in some cases where I've tracked the files down by file size, it will skip the directory name when it moves on. For

hi This is Tarun from Indusa Global , Jamaica pl. reply regards -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tarun.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 180 bytes Desc: Card for tarun kumar Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/19990727/506b9d4c/tarun.vcf

Dear Developers First of all I would love to thank you for a nice tool I had been using rsync within backuppc project to backup my remote hosts. It had been working fine until the moment (as I think) whenever I moved RAID to another box and now the source directory (/raid/research) is now actually NFS mounted. Now backup (rsync process) stalls and sleeps indefinitely On the backup server:

I'm getting a "bad address" error which is causing my rsync process to bomb out. I'm running RsyncX 2.1, in daemon mode on the source machine, with a script to pull the information to the backup server. Both servers are Xserves running OS X Server 10.2.8. Rsync target is on an Xserve RAID. The RAID has 350GB free, so I'm not running into a disk full situation. My command

>From the local machine the following command is executed: /usr/local/bin/rsync -aHnuv serverX:/ / --exclude-from=/rsync.exclude --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync --ignore-existing > /var/tmp/rsync.stdout 2> /var/tmp/rsync.stderr I have never used the rsync command. The above command was used by a former sysadmin to "synchronize" two servers. However when I ran the command

rsync seems to work fine copying from the running system. Files match as far as a random check. I've been hoping to simplify life by rsyncing from the running system to have a bootable backup. Most conversations on the list suggest this is easy, and I've gotten it to happen, and now I've forgotten to do some detail.... ( /etc/fstab is corrected to refer to the device

Hi rsync gurus! [Please Cc: me, as I am NOT subscribed to the list!] First the data points: debian/woody, local server=i386 arch, remote is alpha arch rsync version on both debian 2.5.5-0.2 While upgrading our server to a raid we were hit by a bug which I really consider very strange: The option -n/--dry-run does NOT change files, but DELETE files when called with --delete. Test case I had: $

The following modifiers are accepted after a ???+??? or ???-???: o A / specifies that the include/exclude rule should be matched against the absolute pathname of the current item. For example, ???-/ /etc/passwd??? would exclude the passwd file any time the transfer was sending files from the ???/etc??? directory, and ???-/ subdir/foo???

Note: I don't know if this is a problem withe I20 drivers or Rsync so I'm submitting to both the Kernel Bugzilla and the Rsync mailing list. I couldn't find a bugzilla for Rsync. I hope this was the correct way to submit this issue. Distribution: Debian Hardware Environment: Intel 850MV Mother board, Pentium 4 processor, 1Gig of RAM, Adaptec 2400A RAID Controler. Both the

I have an rsync script that has worked well for me for quite a while now rsyncing RAID volumes attached to two servers, one on our LAN and one at our colocation facility. I have been struggling for months, however, to get the script to run without password prompts so I can run it on cron. The rsync script is running on the system at the colo and ?pulling? files from the LAN system

Has anyone seen this? Looking for past experiences / ideas. Will post progress. I'm tracking down a problem that seems to be caused by rsync. When moving files from a remote server I get a kernel panic. We have a number of servers that back up to a main box -- the panic only occurs when a specific client backs up. It occurs on the box it is backing up to -- not the client. The

Hello, I'm using rsync 3.0.9 to backup several NFS shares from a fileserver, mounted over NFSv3, to a local RAID on a backup server. Both servers are running Ubuntu 12.04 server LTS. The fileserver's filesystem is ext4. The NFS shares are mounted on the backup server as follows: fileserver:/mnt/storage/share1 /mnt/share1 type nfs (ro,tcp,bg,soft,intr,addr=192.168.1.1)

Hello Rsync Community, I have been using rsync for several years to backup servers across an array of different areas. I have run into a new problem that I cannot find an answer for. We just recently purchased a Lacie 5Big Network RAID: http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1596257 for one organization. We set up a test server to start backing up to this RAID via AFP. The

Quick question, Is there a difference if an --exclude-from (or just plain --exclude) is specified on the daemon or the client? I'm setting up daemons on each of my remote servers, and have a host with a RAID connected to it be the client to pull the data over the network. I'm wondering if there is a difference in memory usage, speed, etc. by specifying the excluded files on one side or

I create a new thread, because the issue is not really the same, but i copy here the thread that made me jump into the list. My issue is not really that it waits before starting copying, but a general performance issue, specially when there are multiple rsync running at the same time. Here is my situation : I have multiple clients (around 20) with users and i want to rsync their home dirs with

Hi all, I have a few CentOS servers that I want to mirror live, to be standby spares. The "spare" machines could be either a different machine (with a different motherboard), or a VM in Vmware server. I've used rsync in the past, which works well for doing it while the machine is live. However, I want the destination to be running different hardware, and have a different IP

Hi! I am using rsync succesfully to maintain my mirrors. I have one problem, tho. To improve speeds of my filesystems, I have created a raid 0 of 4 disks, and I place the most heavily copied disks there. The fs has subdirectories, one for each set of typically .iso files, such as Mandrakelinux or fedora. I would like to be able to just do a symlink from the original tree to the directory on the

I'm getting this error message and I don't really understand what rsync is trying to tell me:- rsync: link_stat "/rdiffBackup/gradwell/Mail/." failed: No such file or directory (2) rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(977) [sender=2.6.9] Can anyone explain what it's saying please. /rdiffBackup/gradwell/Mail/ does exist and is

Dear Sir or Madam, Has anyone seen a error message like the following? rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: Too many links (31) rsync: stat "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: No such file or directory (2) As far as I can tell, I am not using any symlinks or hardlinks. Please find below a reasonably complete bug report. Please let

There are quite a few compilation warnings from rsync-2.5.5rc1 that could be eliminated by code cleanup. gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c main.c -o main.o main.c: In function `start_client': main.c:665: warning: unused variable `write_batch' main.c:664: warning: unused variable `whole_file' These warnings will go away when the two variables are properly bracketed