similar to: migration to BitKeeper

Andrew and I thought it might be an interesting experiment to move rsync to using BitKeeper rather than CVS for source code control. For a project with rsync's size and activity CVS is actually fine, but it would be a nice "toe in the water" with BitKeeper to get some practical experience before possibly using it on larger projects. BK is moderately well-proven on open source

I''ve just finished Xeno-HOWTO which contains a detailed list of instructions on how to setting up Xen and XenoLinux, from downloading Bitkeeper, compilation of Xen, XenoLinux, tools to configuration, start and stop of new domains. A complete version has just been pushed in xeno.bk and xeno-1.1.bk in our Laboratory. A partital version is already available in

Hi all, I'm a bit concerned about the following statement included in 2.6.0-test4: +For active users, you are better off using the klibc BitKeeper +repositories, at http://klibc.bkbits.net/ Since I refuse to use bk because I consider the anti-competition clause in the free bk license to (a) be abhorrent and (b) meaning that it's of at best questionable legality for me to use free BK,

hi, lately i try to download xen from bitkeeper - bk://xen.bkbits.net/xen-2.0.bk (ought to be version 2.0); but encounter a probelm when build from source. it has error as follow. the env is cygwin, gcc 3.3.3 and make 3.80 how to slove it? i appreciate any suggestion. sinrecely. jason ===============ERROR BEG ============ ac_timer.c:44: warning: alignment of `ac_timers'' is greater than

BTW, the xenlinux-2.6.11.bk''s version is: ChangeSet@1.2085, 2005-05-12 11:10:24-06:00, djm@kirby.fc.hp.com More work on hyperprivops Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@hp.com> Thanks, Kevin >-----Original Message----- >From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Tian, Kevin >Sent: Friday,

Yes, like real Linux/ia64, it is not possible to run the same Xenlinux bits both on ski and on real hardware. A different configuration and build is required. The config difference is the same as it was with the privified xenlinux... I think you did that successfully before (with privified xenlinux) so give that config file a try and if it doesn''t work, let me know. BTW, I think I know

I am trying to follow the instructions for compiling Icecast 2 at http://i.cantcode.com/~jack/icecast.html . However, I am not getting very far. When I type bk clone bk://shredder.sneakyninja.com/bkroot/icecast icecast I get bk://shredder.sneakyninja.com/bkroot/icecast: Connection refused It worked a few weeks ago the last time I tried it. What's changed? Regards, Simon B. --- >8

Hi, I''m currently writing a Rails app, in a repository controlled by BitKeeper. BitKeeper creates files, in the sub-directories it controls, so for source file yyy.zzz in Directory XXX it saves a file called s.yyy.zzz in subdirectory XXX/SCCS. When these files are created in config/initializers, rails tries to load them when it is run (as they retain the .rb extension). So my question

There are two hosted BitKeeper repos: klibc is a BK clone of the klibc CVS tree 2.5-klibc is my attempts to integrate klibc into the kernel If you want commit access to either repo, send me an ssh1 public key. <b

Hi all. I have pushed my earlier announced kbuild improvements patch to: bk://linux-sam.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc First cset is the earlier posted cset, whit a few small modifications. One important change is that the usr/Makefile now uses *.a files in initramfs-y assignment. I realised that the purpose was to express what kinit were using / referring. Second cset is a trivial cset that just move

klibc integrated with the kernel can now be found at: http://linux-sam.bkbits.net Se the repository: klibc. For non-BK users the patches can be retreived using the following links: klibc on top of 2.6.8-rc2: http://linux-sam.bkbits.net:8080/klibc/gnupatch@41098c67CQHEC6lH2E3rfIXcnRW1RA kbuild adaptions to klibc: http://linux-sam.bkbits.net:8080/klibc/gnupatch@4109923a7O1XqfXw_V7JzAmet_AzbA

Hi Xen people, I can read in the Xen 3.0 Roadmap that "A port to IA64 is making good progress". I have found nothing about IA-64 support in the "bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable.bk" repository. Could you tell if an advanced version for IA-64 is available and where the source files can downloaded from ? Regards Jean-Paul Pigache

Hi, Greg - I have a 2.5.70 BK repository, with klibc integrated, at: bk://klibc.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc This repo has the following features: * Completely up-to-date w.r.t. klibc itself. * Kbuild sort of happy, but still needs an eyeball from Kai to figure out why it always rebuilds everything in usr/. * Supports both IP autoconfig and NFS root from initramfs.

hi, i''ve submitted a small patch to xen-unstable that makes the ''/dev/xx'' -> devicenumber lookup stuff work on my machine.. basically i''m using os.stat instead of os.popen() hacks. this is my first bitkeeper checkin ever, so please verify i did this correctly. thanks, paul ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

Hi, I''m writing an RoR application on a source-control system Bitkeeper. for each source file yyy.zzz in Directory XXX it saves a file called x.yyy.zzz in subdirectory XXX/SCCS. when I try to run ''rake test_unit'' it also tries to execute the files of the bitkeeper as unit tests, which of course fails. Is there a way to tell rake to skip all the files in the SCCS

I want to take the functionality that I found sitting in linux-2.6.8-rc2/net/sched/sch_netem.c for a test drive but I found that the /sbin/tc that I have does not have the necessary knobs. So I grabbed iproute2-2.6.X-ss040702.tar.gz and tried to build it, but I got this: q_netem.c: In function `netem_parse_opt'': q_netem.c:90: error: structure has no member named `rate''

Hello, I have attached a patch wich adds support for 4kb pages to xen 2.0 proper. (No changes were required from xen 2.0-beta. Apprently mixing xenolinux from one release and xen kernel from another release is a no-no. Other than that there were no problems. Thanks to Rupert Schlick for helping to nail it down. The "noacpi" parameter does not seem to be mandatory. Finally

It's now in sync with 2.5.71. bk://klibc.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc <b