similar to: rsync-2.5.0 patch for "make check" bug

I am seeing a problem with the way the rsync of symbolic links is done. Here is a simple example to duplicate this issue: prompt> # Create a test case to show rsync of symbolic link problem prompt> mkdir foo bar prompt> touch foo/file1 bar/file2 prompt> ln -s bar/file2 file prompt> rsync -av . ../duplicate building file list ... done created directory ../duplicate ./ bar/

Hello, Noticed a couple of problems with the rsync testsuite. I have included a possible patch for each problem (attached & inlined.) The first problem is that on OpenBSD when make test is run and tests are skipped you see messages like this: cat: "/tmp/rsync-2/rsync/testtmp.chown/whyskipped": No such file or directory SKIP chown () After my patch, you get the appropriate

You guys got the encryption on? -----Original Message----- From: Tod B. Schmidt [mailto:tschmidt@tnc.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:38 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] winbind authentication I am getting this same error when trying to authenticate. Very frustrating because everything else works, wbinfo, getent. I can login to Win2K server wth kerberos, but I always

LLVMers, On the way to resolving bug 122, I am committing my SymbolTable rewrite. If you are working on anything that uses the SymbolTable, I suggest you read the documentation in include/llvm/SymbolTable.h. The changes I've committed reduce the use of Type::TypeTy. This static member will go away in the future, so please do not propagate new code that uses it. There is no reason to use it

Hi. Here's a patch for copying the atimes of files when -t/--times is given. I bumped the protocol to 29 since it sends more data over the wire. It obviously does not send the atime if it's sending data to an older rsync version. It passes all the tests (including the added atime.test) for me on a: Linux Debian/3.0 gcc 2.95.4 (debian), glibc 2.2.5 system. Any questions/feedback? I

I'm having some trouble getting my shell script to work. I've checked out the Intro to R Manual and a host of other websites, but I still can't get the script to work when I submit the job to the cluster. Here is my main R code: ##Load Libraries ##... ## Load Time Data Args <- commandArgs(trailingOnly = TRUE); print(Args); timeDat <- read.flowSet(files=NULL, path=Args[1]);

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 5:54 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Let's move this to llvm-dev. I should describe my goals/motivation for the work I have been putting into the llvm-testsuite lately. This is how I see the llvm-test-suite today: > > - We provide a familiar cmake build system so people have a known environment to tweak

Okay, I was intrigued, tried it and it turns out you can add make a patch for basic google benchmark support in 40 minutes: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18428 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D18428> So there is a base now if someone wants to write benchmarks for it in the future. - Matthias > On Mar 23, 2016, at 6:00 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >

I am trying to connect to multiple databases, and have setup an abstract class with a call to establish_connection: class TestBase < ActiveRecord::Base self.abstract_class = true end TestBase.establish_connection( :adapter => "mysql", :host => "host", :username => "user", :password => "pass", :database

I posted a patch a few days ago that adds copying of atime. At that time, it was just enabled with -t/--times. After some time, we have figured out that that choice might not have been the best. Here's a new version of the patch (relative to CVS) that adds -A/--copy-atime instead. It also includes a test case. Any feedback on this patch and/or the previous one that I posted?

Let's move this to llvm-dev. I should describe my goals/motivation for the work I have been putting into the llvm-testsuite lately. This is how I see the llvm-test-suite today: - We provide a familiar cmake build system so people have a known environment to tweak compilation flags. - Together with the benchmark executable we build a .test file that describes how to invoke the benchmark and

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this > mail list? A better list for it would be the llvmbugs list for now. I beginning to think that we need a new test results mailing list. We have 3 instances of the nightly tester going now (x86/linux, sparc, ppc) and may have more in the future. The nightly tester

Dear list members, I am trying to use dump.frames to debug some code that i run non interactively. I use the following method: dump.frames.mod = function() { dump.frames(dumpto = 'test', to.file = TRUE) quit(save = 'no', status = 10) } options(error = dump.frames.mod) Is there any way to acess the content of the global environment from the *.rda file created in

Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this mail list? Now results. Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended. New regressions: Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL , expected PASS Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL

Hi, I am trying to test out the scripts here as a proof of concept http://www.r-bloggers.com/integrating-php-and-r/ However, I am not able to reproduce the output graph in the browser. Rscripts is working fine as I run the command "Rscript /home/username/R/testscript.R 1000" for example, and a png graph is output as expected, and I can output it to any folder where I have permission

In the continuing quest to try to track down problems we're seeing in SelectionDAG, I added the following assert toSelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesOfValuesWith: // Read up all the uses and make records of them. This helps // processing new uses that are introduced during the // replacement process. SmallVector<UseMemo, 4> Uses; for (unsigned i = 0; i != Num; ++i) { unsigned

Hello there, I had some software working under Wine 1.1.35 (Testbase - a database of questions for schools). Now I am up to 1.1.44, my installation does not work (in a bottle made with winebottler). I get these errors: OLE error 80004005 and Exception EExternalException in module ntdll at 0001F977 External exception C0000025 in addition to this, X11 crashes each time... I could go back to wine

On Friday 13 November 2009 15:17, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either. > > > > $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc > > Seems due to David's patches. Ok. Send me a testcase and I will fix. This should be put into the testbase. -Dave

On Friday 26 February 2010 09:55:32 David Greene wrote: > In the continuing quest to try to track down problems we're seeing in > SelectionDAG, I added the following assert > toSelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesOfValuesWith: Here's a patch to add more of these deleted node asserts. They fire tons of times in the testbase. This concerns me greatly. Are all of these asserts valid? If

Can anyone advise me on some pratical papers or books On Gaussian Copulas? Anything in the genre of Copulas Dummies Would be a help. As simpe, and approachable with minimal pedantic style. Thanks, Neil -------------------------------------------------------- This information is being sent at the recipient's reques...{{dropped:16}}