similar to: FW: ERROR

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "FW: ERROR"

2001 Sep 07
2
@ERROR
@ERROR: failed to open lock file /var/run/rsyncd.lock : No such file or directory solaris 2.6 (server) rsync 2.3.1 this has never been a problem before. This is a customer's error when trying to upload to our server. They claim it is not their end. I disagree. Anyway, I don't have their version info or OS. Matt
2001 Nov 09
1
[Bug 11] New: no reference to bugzilla on openssh home page
Bugzilla doesn't appear to send new bugs to openssh-unix-dev as Damien said he wanted it to, so I'm forwarding the message I got back. - Dave Dykstra ----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org ----- From: bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org To: dwd at bell-labs.com Subject: [Bug 11] New: no reference to bugzilla on openssh home page Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 03:55:32 +1100
2003 Jan 28
0
Announcing rsync release 2.5.6
Rsync release 2.5.6 is now available at http://ftp.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.5.6.tar.gz ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/rsync/rsync-2.5.6.tar.gz rsync://ftp.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.5.6.tar.gz There is a '.sig' file at corresponding URLs with a gpg signature; the public key is available on the pgp keyservers. NEWS for rsync version 2.5.6, aka the dwd-between-jobs release Changes
2002 May 10
0
openssh 3.1 and rsync dont work - BUTssh 2.9.9.p1 does !
We have AIX 4.3.3 ML09 and AIX 5.1 ML01 I have narrowed the problem down, it is nothing to do with uni/multiprocessor machines. Both rsync 2.3.1 compiled by Bull in an installp and a gcc compiled version of 2.4.5 ( by me ) both have exactly the same problem with SSH 3.1.p1 and both DONT have the problem with SSH 2.9.9p1 - so I assume this is something highly specific to SSH 3.1.1.p1 Hope this
2004 Jun 16
2
FW: Signatures ...
Thanks, Wayne. I was using Firefox. Could you tell me what I am doing wrong with this signature? $ ll rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz -rw------- 1 dking users 515402 Jun 16 09:36 rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz -rw------- 1 dking users 65 Jun 16 14:49 rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig $ gpg --verify rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Fri Apr 30
2001 Dec 18
1
rsync things to do soon
On 6 Dec 2001, Dave Dykstra <dwd@bell-labs.com> wrote: > I still hope to write a --files-from option sometime in 2001. Excuse me if I've forgotten something from earlier: what happens when the sender is remote? Do we send the contents of the file list across along with the arguments, or does this option not work in that case, or is the file named to be opened on the remote
2001 Nov 30
0
Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large filesyst ems
Not sure, I am re-running this to ensure that I was not smoking crack at the time :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:dwd@bell-labs.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:12 PM > To: Keating, Tim > Cc: rsync@samba.org > Subject: Re: Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large > filesyst ems > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at
2002 Jul 02
0
Rsync Daemon Problems on Mac OS 10.1.5
Dave- I've got the rsync daemon running as root, (setgroups() man page said that if setgroups wasn't called as root it would give an error message) and I've configured the ports correctly a la man page. I still get the error with setgroups. If it's a recently implemented security feature could I yank that section out of the code and recompile it again? I haven't had a chance to
2002 Feb 14
0
unexpected EOF in read_timeout (was Re[2]: [Fwd: Re: meaning of "IO Error: skipping the delete...."]])
I should have specified what i was replying to. This section seemed to be in reference to what I had experienced before. " > Well, I'm stumped too. (Although I thought I'd read that the > default timeout was not infinite when not otherwise specified, > but I've got so much going on right now that I could easily be > confused on that one!) > " Tim Conway
2002 Feb 01
0
rsync Warning: unexpected read size of 0 in map_ptr
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:03:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dave Dykstra (dwd@bell-labs.com) said: > > I stumbled across the bug report > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58878 > > > > which shows that you made a bug fix to rsync on Sunday. What exactly did > > you do? > > Attached. It's the same thing as yours, I just
2001 Nov 29
0
rsync with hp-ux 10.20 stock compiler (was Re: CVS update: rsync)
On 28 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <dwd@bell-labs.com> wrote: > The HP compiler needs a -Ae to accept ANSI. Sadly the compiler on this machine reports: configure:5002: cc -c -Ae -DHAVE_CONFIG_H conftest.c >&5 (Bundled) cc: warning 480: The -A option is available only with the C/ANSI C product; ignored. (Bundled) cc: "configure", line 4987: error 1705: Function prototypes
2001 Nov 06
1
Entropy and DSA key
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Dan Astoorian wrote: > Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:23:58 -0500 > From: Dan Astoorian <djast at cs.toronto.edu> > To: Dave Dykstra <dwd at bell-labs.com> > Cc: Ed Phillips <ed at UDel.Edu> > Subject: Re: Entropy and DSA key > > On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 10:54:12 EST, Dave Dykstra writes: > > > On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Ed Phillips wrote: >
2007 Oct 29
0
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(140)
This is an extrememly old post, so it might not be of any use anymore. I encountered this same error, and the problem ended up being a full filesystem (my destination filled up before completion). rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(140) Dave Dykstra dwd at bell-labs.com <mailto:rsync%40lists.samba.org?Subject=rsync%20error%3A%20error%20in%20
2004 Jan 14
6
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 Summary: request for zlib.h configure test Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
2003 Jan 21
6
Please test rsync-2.5.6pre2
The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz There's also a corresponding '.sig' file that contains a gpg signature of the file; the public key is available on the
2003 Jan 13
4
Please test rsync-2.5.6pre1
The first rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre1.tar.gz ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre1.tar.gz rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre1.tar.gz There's also a corresponding '.sig' file that contains a gpg signature of the file; the public key is available on the
2002 Jun 11
2
problem and a question
I am running a simple command, no firewall dropping, going to unix rsync server 2.3.1 from a win2k machine. and I am getting this error. note:(this used to work before I upgraded my win machine from NT4 to win2k. C:\DATA\RSYNC>c:\winnt\rsync -a -v c:\rsync\test-rsync user@www.server.com::site/htdocs/ > c:Connection refused rsh: can't establish connection unexpected EOF in read_timeout
2001 Aug 15
2
open issue regarding local copies and -W
Martin, I want to remind you that there's still an open issue regarding copies when both source and destination are on the local machine (including over NFS): I put a patch into the CVS to automatically imply the '-W' option in that case, and somebody said he was concerned about that because he found that with -W on local copies he had cases where rsync would lock up, and it
2001 Nov 09
0
[Bug 13] New: Need faster ssh startup when no /dev/random or prngd available
----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org ----- From: bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org To: dwd at bell-labs.com Subject: [Bug 13] New: Need faster ssh startup when no /dev/random or prngd available Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 04:25:32 +1100 (EST) http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Summary: Need faster ssh startup when no /dev/random or prngd
2001 Dec 04
1
-v prints directories twice
Does it bother anybody else that -v prints directories twice? It first prints all affected directories and files in recursive order and then prints new directories again. I can't recall noticing that rsync always did that, but I don't think it's a very recent change. The directory is being printed both times by recv_generator(), and I checked CVS and it's been there since the