similar to: win2k + >2GB files problem

Hi! I try to use batch mode to send only the difference between two packed CDs by email over a slow line. I create the diff with: rsync -avvv --write-batch=rs CD-ROM-V6.6.32.zip CD-ROM-V6.6.31.zip where alfred:/Auslieferung/CD # l -n -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 453248121 Sep 2 16:22 CD-ROM-V6.6.31.zip -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 407416499 Sep 29 13:39 CD-ROM-V6.6.32.zip resulting

I'm having a problem with large files being rsync'd twice because of the checksum failing. The rsync appears to complete on the first pass, but then is done a second time (with second try successful). When some debug code was added to receiver.c, I saw that the checksum for the remote file & the temp file do not match on the first try, so (as expected) it repeats the rsync & the

Hi, I used --partial to transfer files from my local computer (rsync 3.1.2, Debian) to a remote computer (rsync 3.1.1 WD MyPassport Storage device) The files get transferred, but after successful transfer, the files are not renamed from .<tmpfile> to <file>. Where to go next? Here is the verbose output after transferring an empty file heiko at blade:~/Pictures$ rsync

I've been using 3.0.0pre8 to move a Debian archive from one filesystem to another. This archive contains a daily snapshot of the Debian ftp site, with common files hardlinked to save space. I noticed that it was using far more space than necessary. Upon investigation it seems that all the source files that have inode numbers greater than 2^31 aren't being hardlinked together at the

Hello! I need to do rsync between local drives on win32. Rsync works, but it never ends. I started it with -vv and it writes something like: total: matches=0 tag_hits=0 false_alarms=0 data=0 And then it stays forever. :-( Could you help me?

Hi, I'm trying to figure out why when I do an rsync (Solaris, version 2.6.4 on both sides) from a site on the West Coast of the US to a site on the East coast, I keep getting directories updated when I use the command like this: # rsync -ar -v -v -i -O --force --delete --exclude=.snapshot --stats \ src:/sysic/lib/freedomlib_V100/ /sysic/lib/freedomlib_V100/ And I get output like this,

Hi All, I'm trying a remote backup for the first time. It is between two laptops, I installed rsync 3.0.7 on both compiled patch -p1 <patches/fileflags.diff patch -p1 <patches/crtimes.diff patch -p1 <patches/crtimes-64bit.diff patch -p1 <patches/crtimes-hfs+.dif f patch -p1 <patches/hfs_compression.diff ./configure make this all works perfectly for local backups, clones

For some reason, Rsync did not copy two specific file. Then I tried to specifically tell it to synchronize one of them and I get this result. *I* don't see any reason why to chose not to copy this file, but maybe on of you out there would see the obvious reason I am missing. dprweb> /usr/local/bin/rsync -vvv --stats -Pzrtpl --delete --password-file=/export/home/webuser/.appprod

I've been having a problem for the past several days with a shellscript that has been working without problems for the 11 months. It's working until the comes up with the following error: total: matches=349 tag_hits=4061 false_alarms=1 data=6628073 ERROR: file corruption in public_html/reports/analog/analog.conf. File changed during transfer? I've tried deleting some of

Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> (So 30 Dez 2018 23:56:44 CET): > I think --partial might be a red herring here. It only applies to what > happens when rsync is aborted in the middle of a file. What happens > without -P? Same happens w/o --partial. I append 2 logs: - a from localhost to remote server, exposing the missing "rename" - b from localhost to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Summary: parent dir permission Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: andras.porjesz at ericsson.com

Let's try this from scratch: I've been having a problem for the past several days with a shellscript that has been working without problems for the 11 months. It's working until the comes up with the following error: total: matches=349 tag_hits=4061 false_alarms=1 data=6628073 ERROR: file corruption in public_html/reports/analog/analog.conf. File changed during transfer?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've compiled rsync 3.0.3 on OSX 10.4 PPC via the plain jane ./configure; make method (no patches). The resulting binary has then been moved to /usr/local/bin/rsync3 and copied to a OSX 10.5.4 Intel client machine as rsync3. I then run the following command: rsync3 -vvv -e ssh -avAX --progress --delete -

Hello. I just started messing around with RSync to synchronize some RRD files between a couple BSD/Linux boxes. To test, I'm just trying to sync about 20 of these files which are about 256KB each. It seems that the full contents of each file are being transferred each time; i.e., the incremental transfer feature isn't working. I'm basing this assumption on output such as the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1582 Summary: rsync dry run cannot find missing folders, contradicts actual run. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: IRIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

I really want to thank you for taking time to help me with this. I have changed the rsyncd.conf as per you suggestion below. I have several different systems that sync to the server and today they were showing this Number of files: 25832 Number of files transferred: 78 Total file size: 49441191919 bytes Total transferred file size: 37421120 bytes Literal data: 36955331 bytes Matched data:

I go thru this every few mnths it seems. Rsyncs exclude rules are very sophisticated but because of that somewhat unfathomable at times. Simplified: I want to exclude directories named no_bak anywhere in the tree but only the files under them, not the direcrories themselves. My exclude rules look like: no_bak/* /no_bak/* The first one does catch directories by that name on the first level but

The attached script file gives all the relevant details - I hope - please ask if you need any more information. /Sam Sam Sexton <mailto:sam.sexton@reuters.com> Reuters Coventry Automated Dealing Technologies Phone: +44 24 7625 6562 Fax: +44 24 7655 5203 -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Visit our Internet site at

> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch? Thanks for the reminder. I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the "branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or Wednesday. I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the man page, so we should fix that in the future.

Hi J.W. et al, Kevin Everets was kind enough to inform me about some strange behavior in his backup script, which seems to be the result of --link-dest behaving unexpectedly in the case where target/ is already populated with older versions of the same file. Here's the situation: We want to do: $ rsync -a --link-dest=../backup.1 source/ backup.0/ There is a file present under all three