similar to: librsync 0.9.5 released

On 24 Apr 2002, "Shirish H. Phatak" <shirish@tacitnetworks.com> wrote: > Since there appears to be a dedicated group of users and lots of > activity, maybe we can convince Martin to roll in these patches and make > a new release? I have been really lax in supporting librsync for the last few months, because of a new job and taking over maintenance of rsync

I found the cvs repository at = http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/ The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have = been why google could not find it yesterday. I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated. The 0.9.5.1 version I was looking for looks to me to be a Jun. 27 cvs snapshot = from wherever cvs was at that

All, Does anyone know anything about librsync, and where it is currently maintained = on the web? It apparently is/was a samba project, but I'm not sure how it relates. The authors are listed as: Martin Pool <mbp@samba.org> Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org> but I suspect someone else did the 0.9.5.1 update, because only 0.9.5 is = available on the rproxy site

I am the author of BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net) and I am working on adding rsync support to BackupPC. I am implementing the server-side in perl, and the client will run vanilla rsync. (BTW, is there the protocol documented? I've answered all my questions by looking at the source, but it would be great to check against any docs.) I started with librsync 0.9.3 and the

I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship, remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites), Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written, could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's response for the state of rsync,

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote: > On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote: > > > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for > > case 1), 3), and 4). > > Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably > something stronger than md4 like SHA-1. md4 is probably good enough for most

I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for questions regarding librsync, but couldn't find any others. I'm trying to get librsync working properly on Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Sparc servers. The problem is that while librsync appears to compile cleanly, "make check" fails the sources.test. Does anyone have any insight as to why this might be? Might I need a specific

Hello everybody, About librsync, does anyone know how to patch the delta without creating a new file ? I used the librsync and it always generates a new file, which is embarrassing if the file is over 1Gb. I tried to store the new file in RAM, but it saturates the machine. Is there a possibility to write in the current file to be synchronized, although this file is currently being

Hi. It seems that librsync got left by the roadside ... is there anything similar for rsync 3.x.x? Or, is there any easy way to use the library routines in the rsync 3.x.x source independantly? The only other open source software I've found that looks similar is xdelta, and it's still beta for v3.x Thanks, Sam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Apologies in advance for a kind of long question: I've written an application called changedfiles (http://www.bangstate.com/software.html#changedfiles), which consists of two parts: a linux kernel module that reports all file operations to a device special, and a userspace daemon which can take arbitray shell action on files matching regexp rules specified in a config file. E.G.,

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, rsync2eran@tromer.org wrote: > A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and > librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision > attacks are known on MD4. Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost? -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Thanks Donovan, I downloaded the librsync 0.9.6 from sf and it compiled just fine believe it or not in the new visual studio.net. There where warnings but no fatal errors and the exe seems to be running just fine. I've tested it just now on a 60 meg mdb file that I've been trying to backup.. it seems to work great!. I even saved the original so I could apply patches and then file compare

Hi - I wrapped R.dll up using somebody code online (see below). I am comparing R on .NET IPC with R(D)COM. I got it all working. Except, I realize that in my client code of the IPC remoting, if I call 'plot' function in R via EvaluateNoReturn, I don't seem to see any results on the R plot window (although the window pops up). Is there anything to do with the code of R.dll wrapper

Full_Name: Venkatesh Mysore Version: R-1.7.0 OS: WindowsXP Submission from: (NULL) (216.165.110.10) While accessing Rproxy.dll repeatedly (using the code from the (D)COM example in the R website) causes a failure in the 24th iteration. R-1.6.2 does NOT give this error. This seems to be a memory management error, that might be linked to the huge leakage difference between R-1.7.0 and R-1.6.2

After a long processing, I was able to create a version of a small C# class that was able to emulate the rproxy by P/Invoke. This is mostly to find a workaround a performance problem of the StatConnector. It's almost work but ... I have strange memory exception when I call the print function. The variable seems to not survive from one call to the other. As there is no debug symbol for

Hi Donovan, Thank you for the insight. I will keep you posted on this. Best Regards Naveen A. >From: Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> >To: Naveen Athresh <naveenathresh@hotmail.com> >CC: rsync@samba.org,librsync developers list ><librsync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >Subject: Re: rsync - windows how should I compile the code any clues >-Thanks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12781 Bug ID: 12781 Summary: rsync library Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: ildar at altlinux.ru

For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic] test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html Here's the tar file of the new

Hi all, I am trying to make calls to R from an MFC application running on XP and am having problems blocking the application while the call executes. I have tried the following approaches to using R from the application (note that I set a wait cursor while R is executing). 1) call rcmd in BATCH mode using system(). This works well, except that I get the cmd window popping up... which makes the

I'm trying to use the rsync algorithm for incremental backups. After a quick look at rsync I saw the batch mode operations, and I thought that maybe I can modify them for incremental backups. What is needed is to add an option to save the checksums of all the files of the level 0 backup and a second option to use the level n checksum to calculate the delta batch files for the level n+1