similar to: Open Database RSYNC

Hi there, In Cisco web site http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_data_sheet09186a008008884a.html It says that regardless of the technology used you have to buy a licencse. Does the license apply to use the phone with asterisk, or, can i just buy the phone? Also, the phone does not requiere to use an AC adapter if used with PoE injectors/switches. Can non-Cisco PoE

What do this uid =0 anfd gid = 0 mean? Can it pose any security issues. Thanks, VC [root] path = / auth users = XXX secrets file = /usr/local/etc/rsyncd.secrets uid = 0 gid = 0 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Hello everyone I am trying to do incremental backups using rsync and SSH. I have a windows server with two shares on it that I want to sync remotely to another machine. [----------------] | windows server | [----------------] [----------------] | FreeBSD server | [----------------] [----------------] | SuSe server | [----------------] I have two samba mounted shares on the BSD server,

Having searched the net, I see that oracle is not supported by rails on a mac osx Intel. Now this may be due to the fact that Oracle is being slow to supply intel based binaries of their drivers, but I find it odd that osx is so well supported, yet this gaping hole exists. I did find an ODBC driver for osx/intel that works to oracle, but of course there is no ODBC driver for Rails that will talk

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote: > > I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the > > grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have > > Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. > > > > This series got me to a green checkmark: > >

I figure some one here may find this interesting. I just begun work on allowing a smb home directory to be automounted upon login. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pam_exec.c.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 213 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/attachments/20070519/19e6bd01/pam_exec.c.bin

Arch = x86_64 OS = CentOS-6.4 (freepbx) Asterisk = 11.4.0 FreePBX = 2.11.0.2 Snom870 Handsets We are in the process of moving to an Asterisk based PBX. At the moment most things work as we wish. However, I have just notices that when I force a reload using 'amportal a reload' I see this loop start in 'asterisk -rvvvvvvvvvv': > Channel Local/s at tc-maint-000002a4;1

On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote: > I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the > grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have > Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. > > This series got me to a green checkmark: > https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983 > > but depends on an as-yet

As discussed at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2014-September/msg00215.html Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- maint.mk | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/maint.mk b/maint.mk index b6ec1b5..76759d4 100644 --- a/maint.mk +++ b/maint.mk @@ -408,13 +408,6 @@ sc_error_message_uppercase: { echo '$(ME): found capitalized error

Hi, This series updates to the latest gnulib, after making most of its "make syntax-check" tests pass. There are still a few tests (listed in cfg.mk) that are simply skipped. To enable one, just remove its test name from the list of tests to skip and run "make syntax-check". [PATCH hivex 01/14] maint: add cfg.mk to prepare for syntax-check [PATCH hivex 02/14] maint: remove

I know this is on the wiki, I just want to confirm so I don't blow up my cisco phones. I've got several cisco 7940's all running using cisco power cubes. However, my boss wants me to switch just a few over to poe, but doesn't want to fork out the dough for a nice cisco poe switch, or anybody else's poe switch for that matter. So my question is, what is the '99.999%

I need to connect up to sixteen phones per building, I can use a cheap hub, but POE would be useful. Is there a cheap POE hub available? Everything I have seen has been expensive. Chris Mason

Hi all, I'm looking for recommendations on ethernet switches for a new install. Ideally would want switches with at least 24 ports, ideally with a GE uplink, and that support PoE (power over ethernet) on every port. I've seen lots of switches, and lots of "power hubs", but the combination, which makes a lot of sense, seems rare. What is out there? Do the switches need to be

Hey guys, I was wondering what POE solutions are being used ? Ive done some searching on google and found that PowerDsine seems to be good brand. Any comments,suggestions, and experiences on POE hubs other POE products would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Steve Maroney

Based on several threads I've read on this list, I assume that it would be handy to supply POE (power over ethernet) in an environment without having to purchase POE switches (assumed expensive) and abandon one's existing (familiar/custom/not-yet-expensed/etc.) switches/hubs. Assume I have a non-POE switch with 24 RJ-45 (ethernet) ports. I design a 1U box that can be mounted just

Hi, Do you need a special cable and power for that unit or you can run it of PoE Switch? Thanks. robert

> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard W.M. Jones [mailto:rjones@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:32 PM > To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄 > Cc: libguestfs@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] maint.mk: remove error_message_period check > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:18:45AM -0400, Chen Hanxiao wrote: > > As discussed at: > >

I have a 501 with traditional power and a 301 with PoE. I rightfully assumed that the traditional power from the 501 would work on the 301. How do I get the PoE to work? Do I use the Polycom PoE cable in addition to whatever PoE injection method I use? I have a Cisco PoE injector that works on my Cisco AP350 and my 7960. No combination of this injector, the Polycom cable, and the phone result in

I'm trying to spec out hardware for a new office, and I'd like to include power over Ethernet as an option. I've seen a handful of PoE injectors around $1000 for 24 ports and a couple switches up around $2500 for 24 ports. Are there any cheaper options, short of buying a boatload of 1-port injectors off of ebay? I don't really need more then 24 ports of PoE out of 48 total

Hey, all. We're rolling out VoIP, and I'm wondering about PoE recommendations, as we're going to have to replace our current network equipment. My first inclination would be to just plunk down the cash and do a Cisco system, but I'm relatively certain that would get shot down by finance. Any recommendations for a couple-hundred-port solution with VLANs, PoE, and QoS? Don't