similar to: prop.test() and the simultaneous confidence interval for multiple proportions in R

Hi All: Let's say I have two dataframes (Condition1 and Condition2); each being on the order of 12,000 and 16,000 rows; 1 column. The entries contain dates. I'd like to calculate, for each possible pair of dates (that is: Condition1[1:10,000] and Condition2[1:10,000], the number of days difference between the dates in the pair. The result should be a matrix 12,000 by 16,000. Really,

Dear R Experts, I am attempting to run a mixed effects model on a within-subjects repeated measures design, but I am unsure if I am doing it properly. I was hoping that someone would be able to offer some guidance. There are 5 independent variables (subject, condition, difficulty, repetition) and 1 dependent measure (value). Condition and difficulty are fixed effects and have 3 levels each

I spent some time on this simple question, also searched the forum, eventually hacked my way to an ugly solution for my particular problem but I would like to improve my coding: I have data of the form: df <- expand.grid(group=c('copper', 'zinc', 'aluminum', 'nickel'), condition1=c(1:4)) I would like to add a new data column "condition2", with values

Hi, I am performing experiments in the field of visual perception where we often apply balanced designs. Within a group of normal subjects, we vary different stimulus conditions (like contrast, luminance, temporal frequency of stimulation) and derive some psychophysical or electrophysiological results from our subjects. Often, the main question is to test the effect of these parameters

Dear all, I'm routinely using lattice and ggplot2, I wish to create a lattice theme that looks not too dissimilar to ggplot's defaults so I can include both graphs in a document with a consistent look. To illustrate my questions, consider the following example: > library(ggplot2) > library(lattice) > > # example data > x <- seq(0, 10, len = 100) > y1 <-

Hello everyone, I bring to discussion the necessity/design of a new type of smart pointer. r215176 and r217791 rise the problem, D5443 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D5443> is devoted to the solution. r215176 applies several temporary ugly fixes of memory leaks in TGParser.cpp which would be great to be refactored using smart pointers. D5443 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D5443> demonstrates

Hi everyone, I'm trying to create an "if" conditional statement with two conditions, whereby the statement is true when condition 1 AND condition 2 are met: code structure: if ?AND? (a[x,y] <condition1>, a[x,y] <condition2>) I've trawled through the help files, but I cannot find an example of the syntax for incorporating an AND in a conditional IF statement.

Hello R-helpers, I'm writing a long function in which I manipulate a certain number of datasets. I want the arguments of said function to allow me to adapt the way I do this. Among other things, I want my function to have an argument which I will pass on to subset() somewhere inside my function. Here is a quick and simplified example with the iris dataset. myfunction<-function(table,

Hi all, I have a large dataset that has >10k entries. The dataset is stored in a dataframe with the headers: SubID Condition1 Condition2 Result1 Result2 There are multiple entries for a given SubID(Subject ID). Condition 1 has 3 levels and condition2 has 2 levels (therefore there are 6 possible combinations all together e.g. Cond1 Level1 x Cond2 Level 1 etc.) and i need to compute for 1. The

I'm unable to find the OR operator like other language .. any suggestions? I want to do If (condition1 OR condition 2){ do something } Thanks for answering this elementary question. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-list, Is there a way to convert the typical long R data-format to a 1-line per subject format? I have data formatted as: Group subj condition variable 1 1 1 746.36625 2 2 1 1076.152857 1 3 1 1076.152857 2 4 1 657.4263636 1 5 1 854.1266667 2 6 1 1191.676154 1 7 1 1028.175385 1 1 2 46.36625 2 2 2 76.152857 1 3 2 76.152857 2 4 2 57.4263636 1 5 2 54.1266667 2 6 2 191.676154 1 7 2 028.175385

I implement the following function,which gets CallInst * and should perform the following: 1. Change the value of the argument if condition1 takes place 2. Change the type of the argument if condition2 takes place 3. Add addition argument/s if condition3 takes place void argChange(CallInst * I) { for (unsigned index = 0; index < I->getNumOperands(); ++index) {

Hi everyone, Although this question is more related to ChIP and ChIP-seq, it could be probably anchored in a more general statistical context. The question is : what method is better to assess the significance of the change in a signal (the signal can be DNA binding, for instance) given the background and 2 conditions. <. condition1 (eg no treatment) : background = 1;

Wouldn't it make programming more error-resistant if vectors were initialized with missing data, instad of zeroes or ""? That way, if you assign values to a vector elementwise and you miss some elements (because their indices were not selected or because the assignment didn't work out, see below for code examples) this would be immediately obvious from the value of the vector

Hello, I have a data frame with a factor column, which uniquely identifies the observations in the data frame and it looks like this: sample1_condition1_place1 sample2_condition1_place1 sample3_condition1_place1 . . . sample3_condition3_place3 I want to turn it into three separate factor columns "sample", "condition" and "place". This is what I did so far: #

I am confused about the @content_for_layout.''cause it will display all the views in the layout.Do I have any methods to let the layout be more OO? I mean that for example,the app currently have more than one views to be displayed,but only some of them to be displayed at the same time at different <div></div> units. I hope there exists a kind of way that: <%= if

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 25 September 2014 06:16, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > I can go & dredge up some examples if we want to discuss the particular > > merits & whether each of those cases would be better solved in some other > > way, but it seemed pervasive enough in the

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev at gmail.com> writes: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I bring to discussion the necessity/design of a new type of smart > pointer. > > r215176 and r217791 rise the problem, D5443 is devoted to the solution. > > r215176 applies several

Hello, I have an error since I run my R code. This error is : Fehler in eval.with.vis(expr, envir, enclos) : > My code is: #CONDITION1 : check if the right logfile is chosen c1=log(z[,3],n) if (c1==FALSE) { plot(0:1,0:1,type = "n", axes=FALSE,xlab="",ylab="") text(0.4,0.8,adj=0,paste("FEHLER"),col="red")

Hi all, I have some code to execute that depends on two things: 1.-) some file is modified 2.-) its log shows some error. So I''d like to define both conditions, and I''ve done it like: file { "file1": recurse => true, owner => "root", group => "root", mode =>