similar to: Bad protocol version identification from UNKNOWN (patch)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Bad protocol version identification from UNKNOWN (patch)"

2006 Oct 03
3
[Bug 1246] Protocol version identification errors don't log the sender IP anymore, always UNKNOWN
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1246 Summary: Protocol version identification errors don't log the sender IP anymore, always UNKNOWN Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: sshd
2006 Oct 15
0
sshd "bad protocol version identification" messages
I'm seeing lines like the following in my security logs: Oct 14 06:56:32 srv sshd[41370]: Bad protocol version identification '\200b\001\003\001' from 24.203.221.239 From what I've read, this is a buffer overflow attack on the sshd whereby the attacker triggers the overflow before the identification string is sent then attempts commands to see if elevated priveleges were
2008 Apr 03
0
[Bug 1246] Protocol version identification errors don't log the sender IP anymore, always UNKNOWN
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1246 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org>
2014 Jul 16
1
ssh - Connection closed by UNKNOWN
Hi, ssh clients shows "closed by UNKNOWN" message when a socket is closed by a remote side while ssh is waiting for user's password: $ ssh user at localhost user at localhost's password: Connection closed by UNKNOWN When the packet_read_seqnr() calls get_remote_ipaddr(), a connection's socket is already closed and there's not been any other call of this function yet
2006 Jul 07
0
Bug#377276: "Did not receive identification string" warning reappeared
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.45 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending confirmed My bad, sorry. --- rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/ssh 6 Jul 2006 10:16:41 -0000 1.18 +++ rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/ssh 7 Jul 2006 19:35:19 -0000 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ sshd\[[0-9]+\]: refused connect from [:[:alnum:].]+ \([:[:alnum:].]+\)$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
2013 Mar 25
1
Bug#703936: logcheck-database: SSH Bad Protocol Version Idenitifcation Rule is incomplete
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal The rule for SSH ignoring "Bad protocol version identification" assumes there are no single quotes inside the version string ('[^']'). I am however getting mails including those lines: Mar 25 22:57:04 Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal sshd[12144]: Bad protocol version identification
2014 Jul 18
2
[Bug 2256] New: ssh - Connection closed by UNKNOWN
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2256 Bug ID: 2256 Summary: ssh - Connection closed by UNKNOWN Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2000 Jun 22
0
Timing bug patch and x509 question.
First the bug: I've found a timing problem in 2.1.1p1 at the point where the client version string is read, a core dump with a "Did not receive ident string..." error. This problem does not appear to have been mentioned yet in the list archive. This bug was noted on HP-UX 11.0 but could be a problem on other Unices as well. My Q&D fix (patch below) was to spin on EWOULDBLOCK
2003 Apr 06
1
[Bug 537] Identification should depend on port number
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537 Summary: Identification should depend on port number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
2014 Jul 18
6
[Bug 2257] New: ssh - Connection closed by UNKNOWN
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2257 Bug ID: 2257 Summary: ssh - Connection closed by UNKNOWN Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2016 Aug 08
3
ssh(d) identification string in portable (clarification)
Hello all, We got a report [1], that we miss "p1" suffix in the sshd identification strings in Fedora. I dig in and found out that it is also missing from portable usptream since 2004, when you were rewriting version.h header file with this information. Debian somehow patched this information back during the time in some places (ssh_api.c is missing). It does not look like
2005 Jul 28
2
Question about the identification header
Hi, I'm writing a little API in java that read/write ogg's comments (in the comment header), as well as reading the information header. All the "read" part is done and is working well, but I am having a little problem while coding the "write" part of the API. In the docs (I use http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html#id4726648), I founded everything
2015 Oct 21
2
bad identification of the CPU pentium dual core ( penryn instead of core2 )
lvm 3.7.0 treats pentium dual core ( cpu family 6 model 23 ) as "penryn" cpu, which triggers a serious bug : - crashs in openGL programs when llvm is used by mesa package, llvm will produces binary code with SSE4 instructions, which is not compatible with pentium dual core, because this CPU doesn't support SSE4 instructions ( bad cpu opcodes ), with llvm 3.6.2 this bug doesn't
2006 Mar 12
1
interop problem: "Missing handling for mandatory IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification)"
Hi everybody, I've connected Asterisk 1.2.5 (libpri 1.2.2, zaptel 1.2.4, Linux 2.6.13.2) to an Avaya-Tenovis PBX via a PRI/E1-line. Calls from SIP-phones via * to the PBX work fine. However, incoming calls to * only result in: -- XXX Missing handling for mandatory IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) XXX -- which seems to be an * problem, because a Windows-fax-machine works fine on a PRI
2002 Feb 01
9
[Bug 94] Userdefineable identification string
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94 ------- Additional Comments From jprondak at visualmedia.com 2002-02-02 09:15 ------- Created an attachment (id=17) Patch to sshd to allow a userdefinable identification string ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2007 May 03
2
Called party identification - where to take called name?
Hello, I am trying to apply the "called party identification" patch (patch 8824) and managed to make it work with a static data. Where do I take the name of the called person (the "equivalent" of CALLERID, but the other way...)? BTW, one note to the above patch: To make it work the device should have the parameter sendrpid set to true.
2004 Jan 09
1
Called Party Identification
Does * support Called Party Identification? Say for example, I dial extension 2000, SIP sends back John Doe from the sip.conf file where extension 2000 is defined? Would this violate the SIP RFC? - Brent
2016 Jun 24
1
UDP Constant IP Identification Field Fingerprinting Vulnerability
We received a notice from our pci-dss auditors respecting this: CVE-2002-0510 The UDP implementation in Linux 2.4.x kernels keeps the IP Identification field at 0 for all non-fragmented packets, which could allow remote attackers to determine that a target system is running Linux. The NVD entry for which contains this note: CHANGE> [Cox changed vote from REVIEWING to NOOP] Cox> So I
2008 Feb 07
1
Identification Header
Hi, While creating identification header in the function * theora_encode_heade*r in *encoder_toplevel.c*, it assigns bits not mentioned in the current theora spec released on Octomber 29, 2007 (page 40 &41). But this implementation in function* theora_encode_heade*r is correct according to the *Figure 6.2 (page 42)*. But not according to the *table mentioned in pages 40 &
2004 Oct 25
1
output processing / ARMA order identification
Dear R users, I need to fit an ARMA model. As far as I've seen, EACF (extended ACF) is not available in R. 1. Let's say I fit a series of ARMA models in a loop. Given the code/output included below, how do I pull 'Model' and 'Fit' (AIC) from each summary() so that I can combine them into an array/data frame to be sorted by AIC? 2. Apart from EACF, are you aware perhaps