Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "ZFS coming to the Mac (again)"
2011 Aug 13
0
3.6.0 rejects new passwords greater than 8 characters
I have passwords stored in passdb.tdb by smbpasswd in Solaris Express 11. For existing accounts, all passwords, including those more than 8 characters, work. However, when I created a new account and assigned it a password greater than 8 characters, I am unable to login from Mac OS X 10.6.8 and Windows Server 2008. The smbclient on the Solaris server still works. Passwords 8 characters or fewer
2010 Nov 08
8
Any limit on pool hierarchy?
Folks,
>From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and a mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs.
Is my understanding correct? Also, is there a limit on the depth of a vdev?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Regards,
Peter
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2023 Jun 03
1
What could cause rsync to kill ssh?
Maurice R Volaski via rsync <maurice.volaski at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh)
> to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script
> runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh
> session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able
> to connect again. Even restarting
2023 Jun 03
2
What could cause rsync to kill ssh?
Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from this computer.
Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6.
I'm copying to a CIFS share mounted on the Gentoo computer.
The rsync scripts are all similar to this one:
/usr/bin/rsync -v -a
2023 Jun 03
1
What could cause rsync to kill ssh?
Maurice R Volaski <maurice.volaski at einsteinmed.edu> wrote:
> Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have
> a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from
> this computer.
>
> Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from,
> which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6.
>
> I'm copying to a CIFS
2007 Feb 17
1
Filesystem won't mount because of "unsupported optional features (80)"
I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel
2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3
complains with
EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80).
I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it
and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made
filesystem, and it completed with
2005 May 19
3
[Q] Where does all the space go?
I created a filesystem as follows:
mke2fs -j -O dir_index -O sparse_super -T largefile /dev/drbd/6
Here's the the output from df
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use%
/dev/drbd/6 475G 33M 452G 1%
It seems that ext3 has taken 23 GB, which is about 5% of the total
disk size, for itself. Is that right?
If that is, indeed, the case, why does df just list 33M as being
2010 Jul 16
1
Making a zvol unavailable to iSCSI trips up ZFS
I''ve been experimenting with a two system setup in snv_134 where each
system exports a zvol via COMSTAR iSCSI. One system imports both its
own zvol and the one from the other system and puts them together in
a ZFS mirror.
I manually faulted the zvol on one system by physically removing some
drives. What I expect to happen is that ZFS will fault the zvol pool
and the iSCSI stack will
2010 Nov 09
5
X4540 RIP
Oracle have deleted the best ZFS platform I know, the X4540.
Does anyone know of an equivalent system? None of the current
Oracle/Sun offerings come close.
--
Ian.
2002 Jul 31
2
Patronizing the exclude * option
I need to get around the requirement of --exclude=* to have all the
parent directories of the files and directories that are to be
included. So given the file..
/startdirectory/subdirectory1/subdirectory2/filetobecopied
I need to include
/
/subdirectory1
/subdirectory1/subdirectory2
I could just include the entire directory structure , but
alternatively just include the needed paths. So the
2003 May 18
2
[Q] Why does it take so long for XP to logon?
If I login to our Samba box (RedHat 7.1 + 2.4.20) under Windows 2K
via Start->Run->share name, I get logged in almost immediately. It
averages about 25 seconds under XP. This behavior has been true in
various versions of Samba since I believe XP was available and is
reproducible on every (several) Windows 2K/XP boxes I have tried.
This is a workgroup environment with Samba acting as
2009 Jul 26
4
Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?
This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version
prior to this one without downgrading the whole package?
* Starting UPS drivers...
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.1
Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.44 (2.4.1)
Detected GXT2-2000RT120 on host upswallleft (mib: ietf 1.3)
[upswallleft] nut_snmp_get: 1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.0: Error in
2009 Jun 25
2
[Q] What might cause modification dates to shift later by an hour?
Recently, our backup software oddly decided to rebackup a good
portion of our file server instead of just doing an incremental. When
I examined various sets of presumably identical files, I discovered
that the modification dates on these files were no longer the same.
Many files were re-dated to exactly one hour later such that if a
file had been modified on 3/24/04 at 2:24:53 PM, it's
2011 Aug 09
2
Log entrys after upgrade 3.6.0
Hi !
I upgraded to 3.6.0 on my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit
and since change to max protocol=SMB2 and nmbd/smbd restarts I get many
of those "NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE" messages
/-------------------------------------
[2011/08/09 15:55:11.130751, 1] smbd/process.c:456(receive_smb_talloc)
read_smb_length_return_keepalive failed for client 192.168.1.109 read
error = NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE.
2006 Feb 19
3
ext3 involved in kernel panic in 2.6.13?
Dual Opteron system running ext3 atop drbd (network RAID) devices,
which, in turn, are atop LVM logical volumes. The underlying device
is hardware SCSI RAID via a LSILogic HBA. The kernel is vanilla
2.6.13 on a Gentoo-based system.
A panic occurred, which contains references to ext3 code.
I'm not sure how others manage to get these typed out, but I'm
manually typing it from
2005 Jun 26
1
[Q] Is errors=panic safe to use, and will it detect a RAID gone psycho?
I have had in years past seen hardware (SCSI) RAID controllers lose
it electronically causing the kernel to fill the logs with scary SCSI
messages and ext3 to complain about "holes" in the filesystem like so:
Sep 7 14:47:17 thewarehouse1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device
sd(8,81)): ext3_readdir: directory #376833 contains a hole at offset 0
I'm using drbd and heartbeat so whatever
2005 May 19
1
mke2fs options for very large filesystems
>Yes, if you are creating larger files. By default e2fsck assumes the average
>file size is 8kB and allocates a corresponding number of inodes there. If,
>for example, you are storing lots of larger files there (digital photos, MP3s,
>etc) that are in the MB range you can use "-t largefile" or "-t largefile4"
>to specify an average file size of 1MB or 4MB
2004 Apr 09
1
[Q] Where and what is t-cs.gmo?
Compiling e2fsprogs-1.35 under Linux complains....
make[2]: Entering directory `/src/kernel/e2fsprogs-1.35/po'
: --update cs.po e2fsprogs.pot
rm -f cs.gmo && : -c --statistics -o cs.gmo cs.po
mv: cannot stat `t-cs.gmo': No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [cs.gmo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/src/kernel/e2fsprogs-1.35/po'
make[1]: *** [all-progs-recursive] Error 1
2007 Jan 13
1
[Q] How can the directory location to dd output affect performance?
I have two Opteron-based Tyan systems being supported by PCI-e Areca
cards. There is definitely an issue going on in the two systems that
is causing significantly degraded performance of these cards. It
appeared, initially, that the SATA backplane on the Tyan chassis was
wholly to blame.
But then I made an odd discovery.
I'm running from the Ubuntu LiveCD for 64-bit. It uses kernel
2005 Jun 17
1
[Q] Is this true and does it mean there is dynamic defragmentation in ext2/3?
Someone recently posted the following statement midway down the page
at
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-305871-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-ext3+ordered+data-start-25.html
>You don't need to defragment ext2/ext3 because as you use the
>filesystem file blocks and inodes are moved around and reallocated
>to keep the data nearly contiguous. It's not perfect, but it