similar to: Was, Re: Help to install horde, is firefox remote [SOLVED]

Testing On 3/6/2014 7:00 PM, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > Send CentOS mailing list submissions to > centos at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-request at centos.org > > You can reach the

When updating a centos 5.x box with the horde package, should the extras or epel version win? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:04 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > My first RH was 5, late nineties. First time I looked at linux and > installed, it was '95, and slack. (We'll ignore the Coherent that I > installed on my beloved 286 in the late 80's). > <snip> You mean you missed all the fun with Xenix on Radio Shack Model 16's and SysV on

Forwarded on Mark's behalf... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Date: Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:04 PM Subject: CentOS list troubles To: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> Hi, Les, Somewhere between late afternoon yesterday, and this morning, something hit me: regardless of whether I post a new topic, or reply, I get *nothing*: not a post,

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:50 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> >> I don't think I need to 'prove' that computer programs do repeatable >> things. I just want to know the version numbers that need to be >> installed - something relatively easy to check. > <snip> > Two other thoughts: first, that it worked perfectly fine the last leap >

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Negative <negativebinomial at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Negative <negativebinomial at gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Negative <negativebinomial at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> >>>>

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 9:46 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 05/27/2015 09:07 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: <snip> >> >> Thanks, Johnny. I *just* posted an apology, that I realized it was an >> EPEL issue.... Talk about an "upgrade disaster"! I think the other admin - >> he's been here

On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been >> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd >> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found >> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Date: Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:33 PM Subject: A CentOS list favor, please: an ethtool question To: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> Hi, Les, May I ask you to forward this to the list? I know I got one email from Karanbir after he modded me so that I couldn't post to the list... but in the last week,

m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS >> 6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but >> the >> other server, not so much. >> >> ls /mountpoint/directory eventually times out (directory being the NFS >> mount). mount -t nfs

My FF 60 just crashed randomly when ever it feels liek it. ive since rolled back to older stable versions until community says its now stable. On 07/27/2018 03:37 PM, wwp wrote: Hello, On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:36:55 -0400 "mark" <m.roth at 5-cent.us><mailto:m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* buggy.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> >> Yes - the unattended fsck fails. Personally, I'd prefer for the >> default run to use '-y' in the first place. It's not like I'm more >> likely than fsck to know how to fix it and it is very inconvenient on >> remote machines. The recent case was an opennms system

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:50 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think I need to 'prove' that computer programs do repeatable >>> things. I just want to know the version numbers that need to be >>> installed - something relatively easy to check. >> <snip> >> Two other thoughts: first,

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:02 AM, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >>> I'm sure most people here know about Dash in Debian. Have there >>> been discussions about providing a more efficient shell in Centos >>> for use with heavily invoked non-interactive scripts? >>> >>> With sh being a link to bash in Centos I don't know if it would

Received -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of centos-request at centos.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:00 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 - Email found in subject Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide

On Tue, January 24, 2017 1:10 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 01/24/2017 08:33 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> I'm building a new box, and I want three partitions - /boot, /, and >>> swap, on*one* RAID 1, not three separate partitions. Other than >>> <alt-f2> mdadm...,*is* there any way in the graphical installer

m.roth at 5-cent.us further wrote: ############## m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > > Up until a few weeks ago, it worked as it has been for years: firefox, > security device is libcoolkey, and pcscd. > > Today, I go to use it (I have done updates sine I last used it), and > try preferences->advanced->certificates, and it hangs. My most recent > try was

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:34 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> To add to your fun, let me present my wish list: >> >> mplayer-gui and libquicktime (latest version from PUIAS) and >> mlt >= 0.9.4 >> > Ummm, NO. NOT the latter, under any circumstance... or hadn't you missed > the huge announcements that Apple would no longer

m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been > looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd > like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found > yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online > storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm

Nux! wrote: > Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not > like the old ffmpeg I ship. Nope. Yes, I'm on CentOS 6, but as this is a US federal organization (civil sector), I did ask, and was told no repos Over There. Security issues.... Thanks, though. > > There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to > upgrade and see if