Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "e2fsprogs Help."
2006 Jun 01
3
Errors on EXT3 on RHEL3, Can we use e2fsprogs 1.36?
SUMMARY
We are getting many ``Free blocks count wrong for group'' errors when
running e2fsck on a 245-GB ext3 filesystem. This is when the file
system is cleanly unmounted on a relatively quiet system to do a
resize. From reading other messages here, my suspicion is that this
is because we have e2fsprogs 1.32.
Questions:
* Should we use e2fsck/e2fsprogs 1.36 and will that probably
2002 Jan 05
1
root fs not mounting ext3
I am using SuSE 7.3 compiled ext3 support into the kernel and installed it.
All my partitions load up as ext3 except / . I ran tune2fs several times,
still doesn't take on the / drive. Most recent dumpe2fs -h show no features
on that drive=, I keep going around in circles, removing .journal from / and
running tune2fs but it never works for /
What am I doing wrong? ( thanks in advance)
2005 Apr 20
1
(no subject)
Hello,
How to upgrade existing ext3 partition to new features? Moved from
RHEL3 to RHEL4.
I had to install from c0d0p6 so partition could not be reformated during
install.
Thanks,
Mindaugas
# dumpe2fs /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 | fgrep features
dumpe2fs 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index
filetype needs_recovery sparse_super
# dumpe2fs
2016 Aug 08
0
centos 6.8 creates install to sde instead of sda
greetings one and all.
when attempting to install centos 6.8 to an i386 mid tower, during
setup of hard disk partitions, selection is for /dev/sde.
if continued, after reboot, error is displayed after 'welcome to centos'.
lines read:
Checking filesystem
fsck.ext4: no such file or directory while trying to open /dev/sda3
/dev/sda3:
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a
2014 May 10
1
location of file-system information on ext4
Hi,
I zero-filled first 10MiB of my SSD(dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=10M
count=1). As expected, this wiped my primary GPD header and first
partition. Before the wipe, GPT was following:
Disk /dev/sda: 250069680 sectors, 119.2 GiB
Logical sector size: 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): 2EFD285D-F8E6-4262-B380-232E866AF15C
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 34, last
2005 Mar 22
1
ext2fs_read_bb_inode: Invalid argument && Can't read an block bitmap
Hello,
sorry if the question was asked a couple of times before but I couldn't
find any useful hinds to this problem using google and the listman
search-engine of the archive of this list.
Somehow the ext3 filesystem on one of my machines died an after a reboot
grub wouldn't come up again.
What I did so far:
fsck -y /dev/hda4
fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
2008 Oct 27
3
dumpe2fs and repquota not agreeing on block size
Hello:
I am trying to set up user quotas on my /var
partition to enforce limits on user's mailbox
sizes. The machine is running CentOS 5.
When I do this:
/sbin/dumpe2fs /dev/md2 | grep 'Block size'
Block size: 4096
That tells me the block size is 4k.
But, if I do:
repquota /var
It is telling me that one of my users is
currently using 10264 blocks. But, if I look
at
2010 Feb 24
1
Overwrite Mechanism
Hi all,
i wanted to ask you all about the exact overwrite mechanism used in
ext3; is the information in the datablocks overwritten or written to a
new location and the information in the referring inode is changed? Is
it depending on the application used (and the functions it calls) or
independent from that?
Please don't hesitate to go into further details and thanks for your
help!
2003 Nov 27
1
commands
hi
I have made ext3 from ext2 by using mkfs -j option.
I want to know if all commands of ext2 like dumpe2fs ( provided in e2fs-1.36
) works fine with ext3 ?
Do we have some commands that are unique for ext3 file system ?
____________________________________________
Salvy
HCL Technologies Ltd A-11, Sector 16 Noida, U.P., India Ph: 91-9811250247
salilt@noida.hcltech.com
2007 Feb 17
1
Filesystem won't mount because of "unsupported optional features (80)"
I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel
2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3
complains with
EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80).
I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it
and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made
filesystem, and it completed with
2013 Sep 17
0
Re: Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
In fact the thing I really want to achieve is to be able to find the
values and the algorithm that enable me to reproduce the percentage
given by df (and to understand deeply what it means).
Why do I need it? Because I'm trying to write some script to do
capacity planning and space problem forecast. Currently I don't really
know which values I should use to do it. (I could use the
2010 Mar 16
2
Ext4 File System: newbee question
Hello,
I have installed Ubuntu 9.10 and it has ext4 filesystem. I have one very
elementary question. When
I say my filesystem is "ext4", which directories are part of it. I mean from
the root I can see some
directories such as /proc, /tmp, /dev etc. Are they store on the disk which
have formatted with
ext4, of certain files resides somewhere else.
I am only sure only about /home
2005 Sep 22
1
repeated crashes
Hello,
I've got a problem that is not solved after an e2fsck.
What happens is that the kernel (vanilla 2.6.12) does this:
journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 1036 on hda6
Aborting journal on device hda6.
ext3_abort called.
The filesystem is mounted with errors=panic, so the system reboots. At
boot-up an e2fsck is run on /dev/hda6. Sometimes it finds errors,
sometimes not.
2013 Sep 17
2
Re: Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
OK. Thanks for the journal information. I thought tune2fs -l and
dumpe2fs were the same. In reality it's almost the same but not
entirely ^^
I hear you about all the internal mecanisms that make the FS working
or give it some features, and I do understand that it takes some place
on the disk. However what I don't understand is why the number given
in the "available column" is
2008 Jan 14
3
Spot the cyclical relationship
I got the following error, but there''s no "cycle" I commented out
File["/dev/sdb3"] and it works, but of course would choke if I ran it
and the requirement were not met
err: Could not apply complete catalog: Found cycles in the following
relationships: File[/dev/sdb1] => Exec[echo -e "0,290\n,290\n," | sfdisk
/dev/sdb]
Here''s the node:
node
2006 Dec 06
3
File size differences
Hey,
I have two identical machines setup with a RAID 5 array. One of them is used for
failovers and data from the master is synced everyday using rsync to the
failover machine. The data on this disks are usually intranet KB's, DB's etc..
The RAID 5 arrays are formatted using the default options i,e mkfs.ext3
/dev/Xda. The RAID controller is 3ware escalade and each disk member in the RAID
2001 May 29
1
this for real?
got the following in the freshmeat newsletter. the page doesn't say anything
about it. also the sct dir on kernel.org still shows the WIP version...
[007] - e2fsprogs 1.20 (Default)
by P. Adami (http://freshmeat.net/users/ramirez/)
Monday, May 28th 2001 19:39
The ext2fsprogs package contains essential ext2 filesystem utilities which
consists of e2fsck, mke2fs, debugfs, dumpe2fs, tune2fs,
2014 Oct 10
0
Re: CF Card wear optimalisation for ext4
On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Jelle de Jong <jelledejong at powercraft.nl> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I been using CF cards for almost more then 7 years now with ext
> file-system without any major problems on ALIX boards.
>
> Last year I took 30 other systems in production with ext4 and the CF
> cards been dropping out pretty fast, it may have been a bad batch but
2008 Mar 11
0
Unusual Block Allocations on OSTs
Hi,
I see some unusual block allocations on my OSTs, and I was wondering if
someone could explain to my why, and help me to fix a performance
problem.
In order to track down a performance issue, I ran the following test:
- I reformatted my OSTS (I have 4 OSTs).
- I created a 10G file on each OST.
- I ran dumpe2fs to see if I had some unusual fragmentation going on.
dumpe2fs shows
2008 Feb 07
0
equota reporting wrong blocks
Hi Friends,
I am running samba as domain member of AD 2k3 on Centos 4.4 . Quota of
2GB is set for each user but for one of the user quota or edquota is
showing wrong blocks even though disk space occupied by that user is
809M.
quota bhavesh.kumar
Disk quotas for user bhavesh.kumar (uid 11254):
Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files quota limit grace
/dev/cciss/c0d0p5