similar to: Ext3 corruption using cluster

When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the following messages are printed: [28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.685036] Kernel

Hi all, I am testing new kernel on a mips machine (64 bits for kernel, 32 bits userland) and I found a problem when mounting the root file system. It is an ext3 file system that is correctly mounted as read only. While booting the system remount the file system as read/write and keep starting all daemons. Moving from 2.6.26 to 2.6.30 kernel, I get this error while remounting the file system

Hi, I could not find this anywhere else reported, so here we go: creating a new btrfs filesystem (btrfs-progs-unstable from git) and mounting it succeeds, unmounting however fails with the kernel messages attached to this mail. After that, I can still read and write to the btrfs mount, but e.g. /bin/sync never finishes, sysrq-s never reports "Sync complete". I''m using a

Ralf Hildebrandt reported[0] the following messages on ext3-users: name_count maxed, losing inode data: dev=00:05, inode=5221 because the filesystem in question is indeed ext3. However, this warning is not generated by ext3 code but by the audit framework. While the origins of these messages are discussed elsewhere[1] the following patch modifies the printks in question so that users know

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2093 Bug ID: 2093 Summary: don't forward authentication for the whole keyring Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

I guys! i have 2 servers in replicate mode, the node 1 has all data, and the cluster 2 is empty. I created a volume (gv0) and start it. Now, how can I synchronize all files on the node 1 by the node 2 ? Steps that I followed: gluster peer probe node1 gluster volume create gv0 replica 2 node1:/data node2:/data gluster volume gvo start thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do: http://jason.roysdon.net/2009/10/16/building-bind-9-6-on-rhel5-centos5-for-d nssec-nsec3-support/ The steps, yum

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do: http://jason.roysdon.net/2009/10/16/building-bind-9-6-on-rhel5-centos5-for-d nssec-nsec3-support/ The steps, yum

Hi! I'm new to the list. I have a problem with mounting my home directory since my PC crashed. I hope that I can get some help on this list as I don't know much of ext3 myself. The mount command for my /home gives me the following output: # mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/tmp/ mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda6, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info

Hi, I'm trying to setup automatic sync of files over SSH from node2 to node1. node2 is the "server" and node1 is the "client". I have setup rsync like this on the nodes which runs AIX (4.3.3 and 5.1): 1. Installed rsync from Linux Toolbox (rsync-2.5.4-1.aix4.3.ppc.rpm) on both nodes. 2. Added following to both nodes /etc/services file: rsync 873/tcp 3. Added

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20110303/0fbefee6/attachment.html

I am having trouble adding a node to the selection DAG (e.g. during combine) E.g. node1 -> use1, use2 Now if you add a node2, with node1 -> node2 with node2 number of output values equal node1 number of output values, then combine as well as e.g. promotion pass with replace all of node1's uses with node2, leaving node1 dead. While this is kind of expected, does this mean a) always

Hi, I have one xml file. <Class> <Node1 code ="1"> First node </Node1> <Node2 code ="1"> Second node </Node2> <Node3 code ="1"> Third node </Node3> <Node1 code ="2"> Fourth node </Node1> </Class> for (i in 1:xmlSize()) { print(Class[i]) # how can i filter Node1 ? } by

Hi, I am trying to use Hiera in puppet 3 and I have two nodes that both need the same configuration. In this case they are two web servers which have the same apache configuration. Rather than creating two seperate hiera files for node1.yaml and node2.yaml is there a way to group these by role (e.g. webserver.yaml)? I want to avoid duplicating the configuration if possible and keep the data

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2559 Bug ID: 2559 Summary: Warnings from reading moduli file, refer to primes file Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585 --- Comment #8 from mindrot at nerdbynature.de --- Created attachment 2274 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2274&action=edit Include option patch for OpenSSH 6.2 This is really just a modified version of Gavin Beatty's patch, slightly altered so it'll apply cleanly to OpenSSH 6.2 (i.e. yesterdays CVS checkout).

In the below example normal Internet traffic is routed as shown from node1 to internet1. The node1 defaultrouter points to the firewall and the firewall points to internet1. For node2 is it possible to add it's own link to the Internet passing through the same default router and firewall as node1. The links do not need to failover or provide any redundancy. node1---node1

Hello, Is there any reasonable way to monitor the health of replicated volume and sync it, if out of sync ? Regards,