Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "renaming a domain"
2010 Oct 01
1
undefining and redefining a Domain
<resending as I don't think I was in the mailing list yet when I sent
first time... apologies if you receive this twice>
Hello,
I'm facing some strange behavior, and I hope you can provide a
clarification.
Consider the following code:
virDomainPtr dom = virDomainLookupByName(virt, domain_name);
if (dom) {
printf("domain already
2023 Mar 28
1
[PATCH v8 4/6] security: Allow all LSMs to provide xattrs for inode_init_security hook
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 3:47?AM Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-03-27 at 17:02 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:30?AM Roberto Sassu
> > <roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 17:39 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:26?AM Roberto
2006 Oct 09
1
Login to domain.
I'm running Centos 4.2, with 3.0.23b-SerNet-RedHat as a NT 4 Domain. My
Window XP machine logs in perfectly well to the domain. I have another
machine running Opensuse 10.2 which I joined to the domain with no
problems.
using opensuse, I'm unable to loging to the domain. I get the message
xserver: login (domain\user) is disabled. On the server samba.conf the
shell is set to template shell
2023 Feb 19
1
[PATCH v7 6/6] evm: Support multiple LSMs providing an xattr
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:41 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
>
> Currently, evm_inode_init_security() processes a single LSM xattr from
> the array passed by security_inode_init_security(), and calculates the
> HMAC on it and other inode metadata.
>
> Given that initxattrs() callbacks, called by
>
2023 Mar 08
1
[PATCH v7 0/6] evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 5:42?AM Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
>
> One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side
> without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on
> individual LSM decision.
>
> Several changes need to be made to
2007 May 31
1
Selective 'expansion' of arguments in a match.call() result ...
Is it possible to write a support function to automatize selective
argument expansion (based on argument value type) as in the following
example, in order to write terse code even when there are many
arguments? Forcing evaluation of all arguments is not a problem ...
______________________________________________Thanks a lot!__________R_
# When called with document = 1, we have the
2023 Mar 14
1
[PATCH v8 3/6] security: Remove security_old_inode_init_security()
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
As the remaining two users reiserfs and ocfs2 switched to
security_inode_init_security(), security_old_inode_init_security() can be
now removed.
Out-of-tree kernel modules should switch to security_inode_init_security()
too.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at
2008 Jul 05
1
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 9
>
> ---------- Mensaje reenviado ----------
> From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>
> To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:52:36 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shaper
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:47:31PM -0500, RokeFeler wrote:
> > Saludos, Tengo 3 inferfaces eth0, eth1, eth2
> > eth0 - Net
> > eth1 -
2022 Dec 01
1
[PATCH v7 3/6] security: Remove security_old_inode_init_security()
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
As the remaining two users reiserfs and ocfs2 switched to
security_inode_init_security(), security_old_inode_init_security() can be
now removed.
Out-of-tree kernel modules should switch to security_inode_init_security()
too.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at
2023 Mar 27
1
[PATCH v8 4/6] security: Allow all LSMs to provide xattrs for inode_init_security hook
On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 17:39 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:26?AM Roberto Sassu
> <roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 11:18 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 20:09 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:19?AM Roberto Sassu
> > > > <roberto.sassu at
2023 Mar 14
1
[PATCH v8 1/6] reiserfs: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to
security_inode_init_security(). Commit 572302af1258 ("reiserfs: Add missing
calls to reiserfs_security_free()") fixed possible memory leaks and another
issue related to adding an xattr at inode creation time.
Define the initxattrs callback
2023 Mar 14
2
[PATCH v8 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to
security_inode_init_security().
Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the
ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the
name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs.
As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can
2020 Sep 22
3
Asterisk Drop call
Hello.
Thanks for the reply.
Yes. In the traffic analyzed, the BYE is sent by the originator of the
call, but there is no "human" hangup, but the asterisk one.
BYE is sent, received and confirmed.
I don't know how I could investigate the reason for this BYE.
Em 21/09/2020 17:12, Dovid Bender escreveu:
> Is there anything in the Asterisk logs? Which side sends the BYE? Were
2023 Mar 24
1
[PATCH v8 4/6] security: Allow all LSMs to provide xattrs for inode_init_security hook
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:26?AM Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 11:18 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 20:09 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:19?AM Roberto Sassu
> > > <roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > > > From: Roberto Sassu
2023 Jan 10
3
[PATCH v7 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security()
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:41 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
>
> In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to
> security_inode_init_security().
>
> Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the
> ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the
> name/value/len triple
2008 Oct 28
1
Marginal effects in negative binomial
Dear All,
I carry out negative binomial estimations using the glm.nb command from the MASS package.
Is there a command or a simple procedure for computing marginal effects from a glm.nb fitted object?
If these are the same as for a Poisson fitted object (glm), my question remains how to compute them.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Roberto Patuelli
********************
Roberto Patuelli, Ph.D.
2005 Oct 04
1
time out error and email with attachments
I'm facing some problem with emails and attachments.
I'm not sure it's dealing with MTU (it is set to the maximum number
before a fragmentation occurs).
I have no errors from pop3, but the following message is the best I can
show you just to understand my problem.
The log shows this:
"imap(roberto.cipollini at allmediasolution.com): Oct 04 17:35:03 Error:
Timeout while
2007 Mar 29
1
Interconnexion d'un serveur Asterisk à des PABX LG ( IP LDK)
bounjour
je dispose de differents commutateurs de LG (IP LDK) sur differents sites.
je voudrais savoir comment je pourrais interconnecter ces differents IP LDK
a un serveur Asterisk via IP ( ceci sous entend que chacun de ces
commutateurs dispose d?j? d'une carte VOIBE).
Mecri d'avance pour l'aide
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger :
2009 Jan 30
1
Fitted values and residuals from glmmPQL (MASS package)
Dear All,
I would like to analyse the residuals from a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) that I estimated, with random effects, by means of the command glmmPQL, from the MASS package.
It is not very clear to me what the actual residuals to analyse are (Y - Yhat): I obtain two columns of residuals, of which the first are population residuals, and the second refer to the grouping used in the
2017 Feb 27
2
LLVM social in Sweden?
Hi all,
Thanks for the answers! I've also received a couple of answers
off-list, so there should be enough of us to get something rolling.
I think we should start with something informal to get to know each
other and see what our interests are etc. So, I've created a poll with
a random slice of March here [1], so we can sync on the date / time.
Please pick as many options as you can. The