similar to: [libvirt] configuring network interface

Hi, I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 , I don't see anything which i am assume is normal. eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:44:DB:CC BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5

Hello I''m developing a system using libvirt and I need to use "migrate" to move guest to different hosts. I'm testing using a cluster connected by ssh, and I'm connect ok trought them, using virsh and virt-manager. But if I try to migrate doing: *virsh # migrate --live scompi1 qemu+ssh://rionegro/system* I got: *error: monitor socket did not show up.: Connection

Hi, I have 8 ethernet cards installed. Is it possible to use eth0-eth6 as the net interface for shorewall and eth1 as the lan network? Thanks. sangprabv sangprabv@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can see from different post that if working with sr-iov, i should work with vlan Is this an obligation to work with vlan if working with sr-iov? If not according to which parameter will the different vf get the traffic. Let's say i declare max_vfs=7, how will the traffic be seperated between the vm? However till i get an answer i tried to work with vlan And i still don't get

Hello all, I am new to Linux Ethernet bridging. Let me first start with what I am trying to achieve. Well you see - I am attempting to have 2 main firewall running at the same time - one as a master and the other one as a slave. Yes, I would like to make use of Ethernet bridging in this scenario - as I understand it, all I need are two machines and STP enabled. I am running Debian

Hi All :) I have three servers, all with centos 7 installed 3 days ago. I need on them "old" naming scheme (ethX) for network interfaces, because of that: # grep GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX /etc/sysconfig/grub GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/swap rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/root rhgb quiet ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0" net.ifnames=0 was added and afterwards I ran:

Anyone know how to get statistics on bonded interfaces? I have a system that does not use eth0-3, rather we have bond0, bond1, bond2. The members of each bond are not eth0-3, rather they are eth6, eth7, etc. I didn't see anything in the man page about forcing sar to collect data on specific network interfaces.

On 28/01/17 05:21, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote: >> Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over? > > I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but > having relatively little luck with that solving the problems. Stabbing > the the dark I've tried different ACPI settings, including

Hello: When I start the guest with an image on NFS file system, the ubuntu doesn't boot, It's remain on inittrams. I've tried to redefine the guest without <apic> <pae> configuration as I see on a blog, and I've increased the parameters of the mount to rsize=32768 and wsize=32768, but it still doesn't work. Can anyone give any advice to get it? Thank you very much.

Hi, I met a problem when using bridge with netfilter. The kernel version 2.4.20, and the patch is bridge-nf-0.0.10-against-2.4.20.diff. Our firewall configuration is as follows, eth3,eth4,eth5,eth6 configured as a bridge with an IP address 10.0.0.1. The local net connect to the internet via the gateway 10.0.0.1 and SNAT is applied on the firewall. It worked but sometimes there are some

Hi all, First of all I repost this email in shorewall list as there are a lot of firewall experts here that might know what the hell i going on. We have also posted this on the linux bridge list (we needed acceptance first) and leaf list. Very thankful for your understanding. We are experiencing a very strange problem and would need some help. We have a Leaf / Shorewall based box (actually

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:20, Rafa? Radecki <radecki.rafal at ...> wrote: > Hi All :) > > I have three servers, all with centos 7 installed 3 days ago. I need on > them "old" naming scheme (ethX) for network interfaces, because of that: > > # grep GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX /etc/sysconfig/grub > GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/swap

Hi I am trying to do passthrough to guest using sriov and libvirt I tried to use both techniques from here http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Assignment_with_.3Chostdev.3E <http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Assignment_with_.3Chostdev.3E> Assignment from a pool of SRIOV VFs in a libvirt <network> definition Assignment with <interface

I added libvirt-users@redhat.com back to the Cc for this response. Please don't remove the list address when responding to postings on a mailing list. A message to the list is *much* more likely to reach someone who knows the answer than is a private message to a single person. On 3/26/19 10:03 AM, Harsh Gondaliya wrote: > Mar 26 19:25:01 dpdk-OptiPlex-5040 libvirtd.service: 20423:

Hello, Our OS is AIX 6100-06-05-1115 and SAMBA version is 3.3.12.0 We have two network interfaces with different IPs. Now we restrict SAMBA active in onf of the interface. SWAT and smbd can start. But nmbd and winbindd processes can't start. And there is below warning info in log.nmbd and log.winbindd. Please give your suggestions and thx. pekwj42a-> # cat /usr/lib/smb.conf # Samba

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:57 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

Hi, I'm on a Dell VEP 1405 running Debian 9.11 and I'm running a few tests with various interfaces given in PCI passthrough to a qemu/KVM Virtual Machine also running Debian 9.11. I noticed that only one of the four I350 network controllers can be used in PCI passthrough. The available interfaces are: *# dpdk-devbind.py --status Network devices using kernel driver