similar to: howto setup linux guest with 2 nics

Hi I am using virt-manager and created bridge at host . My host nw interfaces is auto br0 iface br0 inet static address x.x.x.178 network x.x.x.0 netmask x.x.x.x broadcast gateway x.x.x.x[gateway of eth0 earlier] bridge_ports eth0 bridge_fd 0 bridge_hello 2 bridge_maxage 12 bridge_stp off #dns-search google.com dns-nameservers x.x.x.x x.x.x.x with this config 1] net inside host is working 2]net

Hi Guys I''m trying to measure the traffic of domUs using vnstat without luck. My configuration: Debian 6.0.3 xen 4.0.1 vnstat 1.11 I''m using bonding with two network cards. auto bond0 iface bond0 inet manual slaves eth0 eth1 bond-mode active-backup bond-miimon 100 bond-updelay 200 bond-downdelay 200 bond-primary eth0 auto br0 iface br0 inet static

Hi, Sorry of this is the wrong list, trying to find some help. I am trying to set up 2 KVM hosts using Debian 9 (connecting to a 3 node Centos 7.4 gluster cluster) To get the bandwidth I have bonded 2 NICS each end. However while the network works fine for the Debian VM host the VM guests cannot connect/get an IP using DHCP connecting to br0. (Same setup on the Centos end works fine however)

So, I have been running into network problems for a while on 4 boxes that I installed xen on so that some engineers have places to test code. This particular problem is happening on all 4 of these boxes. (although, it isn''t happening on an older box running xen from debian etch). What appears to be the problem is that traffic is getting dropped between the vif#.0 interface in dom0

On 12/14/2013 10:51 AM, scar wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: >> I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which >> bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? > > well i don't quite understand bridges and their function, i'm kinda > just following directions.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: > I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which > bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? well i don't quite understand bridges and their function, i'm kinda just following directions. br0 replaced eth0 though in my interfaces file according to this guide[1] i

Hi, we''re running 4 xen servers on our network with multiple network cards. During HighLoad we experince degeneration of inbound network traffic through our loadbalancer. I might found a reason for it, in Dom0 dmesg output looks as follows: [1157421.975910] eth0: received packet with own address as source address [1157421.975957] eth0: received packet with own address as source

Hi, Firstly I apologise for the cross-post, however I don't expect to get as quick a response from the package maintainers as I do from the Debian community, and this issue affects a service that I've got scheduled to go live at midnight this evening. :( A recent update from xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 version 4.1.3-7, to version 4.1.3-8 on Debian Wheezy has caused all vm's on this host

Hi, Firstly I apologise for the cross-post, however I don't expect to get as quick a response from the package maintainers as I do from the Debian community, and this issue affects a service that I've got scheduled to go live at midnight this evening. :( A recent update from xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 version 4.1.3-7, to version 4.1.3-8 on Debian Wheezy has caused all vm's on this host

On 12/16/2013 04:47 AM, Gao feng wrote: > On 12/14/2013 10:51 AM, scar wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: >>> I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which >>> bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? >> well i don't quite understand bridges

I can’t seem to find info about layer 2 tinc tap interface bridge with local physical nic. I have successfully created two nodes configuration with tinc acting as switch. My problem is ethernet packets only flow between two nodes and not to hosts on bridged nic. Example: Server 1 - eth0 bridged with tinc tap device, then bridge gets IP via dhcp server on physical nic subnet. Server 2 - local

Hi * in xend-config.xsp I have: ******************************** (network-script network-route) (vif-bridge xen-br0) (vif-script vif-bridge) ******************************** and in /etc/network/interfaces ********************************* iface eth0 inet static address 0.0.0.0 auto xen-br0 iface xen-br0 inet static pre-up ifconfig eth0 up pre-up brctl addbr xen-br0 pre-up brctl addif

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5

Hello everybody! Spse I have the following X <- seq(1:100) #(a dim(100) sequence of integers 1:100 representing the possible actions of player 1 and player2 in a game) BR2X<- br2(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100) representing the best response function of player 2 to player 1:s actions) BR1X<- br1(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100)

Hi, I'm not in the list and I just would like to comment it to the comunity. So, if someone want to contact me, make CC to me in the reply. The wiki page [1] talk about networking, and show two typical configurations: "virtual network" and "shared physical device". The shared physical device has an error or something that could make confused, I think. What I want to

A CentOS 6.3 box ("host") runs several KVM virtual machines, each of which has two interfaces attached to the two bridges br1 and br2 (and each thus has two IP's; one on 192.168.0.0/22 and one on 192.168.4.0/22); net.ipv4.ip_forward on the host is 1. Simplified diagram: host +---------------+ |

Hi, I have two public ip''s and i want to dedicate one ip for incoming and outgoing to one server. I followed http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm and used the example of the daughter system. I have a machine connected on vmbr0 with address 10.10.10.1 listening on port 80 www. Still I can''t connect to this system. I''m forgetting something? Sincerely,

I'm using ubuntu 12.04LTS I setup a bridged network: # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp auto br0 iface br0 inet dhcp bridge_ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 Seems to work. Then I created a virtual machine using Ubuntu's vmbuilder tool like so: vmbuilder

On 12/25/2015 12:44 PM, Joey wrote: > > i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices. > > I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default > gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the > incoming device > > Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables? No you can not do that via firewalld or iptables. The problem is