similar to: libguestfs mounting solaris 10 ZFS guest

Hi, all, I think I''m missing a concept with import and export. I''m working on installing a Nexenta b134 system under Xen, and I have to run the installer under hvm mode, then I''m trying to get it back up under pv mode. In that process the controller names change, and that''s where I''m getting tripped up. I do a successful install, then I boot OK,

I spend yesterday all day evading my data of one of the Windows disks, so that I can add it to the pool. Using mount-ntfs, it''s a pain due to its slowness. But once I finished, I thought "Cool, let''s do it". So I added the disk using the zero slice notation (c0d0s0), as suggested for performance reasons. I checked the pool status and noticed however that the pool size

Hello all, I am having an issue with guestmount in respect to live instances and I was hoping someone might have an idea where I've gone wrong. The following output is from my shell session, if there's any more information needed please let me know and I'll happily provide it. [root at longitude ~]# virt-filesystems -d F16-rawhide/dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 [root at longitude ~]#

First let me say that I'm not a sysadmin, but am simply wearing that hat this week so please excuse my ignorance. I need to temporarily move some virtual servers from a CentOS-KVM platform to a CentOS-XEN platform while I do some upgrades to the CentOS box. I've created a local LV, and used DD and SCP to transfer the block device from the VKM machine to the XEN machine. For quite a

This is a hypothetical question that could actually happen: Suppose a root pool is a mirror of c0t0d0s0 and c0t1d0s0 and for some reason c0t0d0s0 goes off line, but comes back on line after a shutdown. The primary boot disk would then be c0t0d0s0 which would have much older data than c0t1d0s0. Under normal circumstances ZFS would know that c0t0d0s0 needs to be resilvered. But in this case

IF you run solaris and opensolaris ?for example you my use c0t0d0 (for scsi disk) or c0d0 (for ide /SATA disk ) as the system disk. In default ,solaris x86 and opensolaris will use RAW driver : c0t0d0s0 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0) as the member driver of rpool. Infact, solaris2 partition can be more then one in each Hard Disk, so we also can use the RAW driver like : c0t0d0p1 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p1)

Hello, I recently installed SunOS 5.11 snv_91 onto a Ultra 60 UPA/PCI with OpenBoot 3.31 and two 300GB SCSI disks. The root file system is UFS on c0t0d0s0. Following the steps in ZFS Admin I have attempted to convert root to ZFS utilizing c0t1d0s0. However, upon "init 6" I am always presented with: Bad magic number in disk label can''t open disk label package My Steps: 1)

# lucreate -n B85 Analyzing system configuration. Hi, after typing # lucreate -n B85 I get the following error: No name for current boot environment. INFORMATION: The current boot environment is not named - assigning name <BE1>. Current boot environment is named <BE1>. Creating initial configuration for primary boot environment <BE1>. ERROR: Unable to determine major and

Just replying to let you know I'm listening =)... Sorry Dave, I'm running 2.2.3a on my Solaris 8 machine and even that still has some issues with winbind. By the way, while I have the attention of you Solaris Gurus... I was trying to make my Ultra 1 boot from an external disk on the same scssi channel as the default boot disk. I changed my /etc/vfstab for the new disk to have the right

Zpool split is a wonderful feature and it seems to work well, and the choice of which disk got which name was perfect! But there seems to be an odd anomaly (at least with b132) . Started with c0t1d0s0 running b132 (root pool is called rpool) Attached c0t0d0s0 and waited for it to resilver Rebooted from c0t0d0s0 zpool split rpool spool Rebooted from c0t0d0s0, both rpool and spool were mounted

I'm hoping the community knowledge can help me out here. I have found great value in R, especially using it to generate charts, but I am still scaling the learning curve in a number of ways. I am looking plot one grouped line and one ungrouped line in a lattice plot. I can plot one grouped line like this (the line's color in each panel becomes dependent on the newpool value):

Folks: I am unable to get my opensolaris sn-b85 domU to start up in an opensolaris sn-b85 dom0. I am booted to xvm. Other systems, such as Fedora 8, WinXP Pro, W2k3 server, W2k8 server and Windows Vista startup normally. I have used the following to build the domU: # mkfile -n 25g /solhvm/solhvm.img # ls -l /solhvm total 269 -rw------T 1 root root 26843545600 Jul 7 10:37 solhvm.img

Platform T2000 SunOS ccluatdwunix1 5.10 Generic_125100-10 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200 I have a user that stated zfs is allocating more file system space than actually available via ls command versus what df -k shows. He stated he used the mkfile to verify if ZFS quota was working. He executes "ls -s" to report usage which reports more allocated than available from "df

(for some reason I cannot find my original thread..so I''m reposting it) I am trying to move my data off of a 40gb 3.5" drive to a 40gb 2.5" drive. This is in a Netra running Solaris 10. Originally what I did was: zpool attach -f rpool c0t0d0 c0t2d0. Then I did an installboot on c0t2d0s0. Didnt work. I was not able to boot from my second drive (c0t2d0). I cannot remember

Hello, Has anyone encountered the following error message, running Solaris 10 u8 in an LDom. bash-3.00# devfsadm devfsadm: write failed for /dev/.devfsadm_dev.lock: Bad exchange descriptor bash-3.00# zpool status -v rpool pool: rpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in

any idea what the reason for this error is? [2006-11-07 13:59:31 xend 3167] DEBUG (__init__:1072) exception looking up device number for 0: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: ''/dev/0'' my config file looks like this: name = "solaris" memory = "400" kernel = "/solaris/platform/i86xen/kernel/amd64/unix" extra =

I have configured a test system with a mirrored rpool and one hot spare. I powered the systems off, pulled one of the disks from rpool to simulate a hardware failure. The hot spare is not activating automatically. Is there something more i should have done to make this work ? pool: rpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for

I have a system running in a VM with a root pool. The root pool occasionally shows a fairly stern warning. This warning comes with no check sum errors. bash-3.00# zpool status -vx pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore

Hi all, I would like to add a new partition to my ZFS pool but it looks like it''s more stricky than expected. The layout of my disk is the following: - first partition for Windows. I want to keep it. (no formatting !) - second partition for OpenSolaris.This is where I have all the Solaris slices (c0d0s0 etc). I have a single ZFS pool. OpenSolaris boots on ZFS. - third partition: a FAT

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:26:24PM +0300, Active Systems O? wrote: > Hi, > > As I couldnt find any appropriate bugzilla - so I'll post directly to you. There seems to be a problem with EPEL repo libguestfs-1.0.85-1.el5.5 rpm (x86_64) - for example it is very slow with VM filesystem copy as it does not make use of KVM acceleration (running plain qemu). > Running