similar to: Perl module versioning

Hi- Is it safe to use the zerofree utility on an ext4 partition inside an LVM with guestfish? I know zerofree works on ext4, but I am unsure about LVM. The info page uses the syntax "zerofree <device>", so using the info page example, could I (safely) do something like the following? $ guestfish Welcome to guestfish, the libguestfs filesystem interactive shell for

Simple refactoring, no actual behaviour changes. --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) diff --git a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml index 8ca7ca0..3b27740 100644 --- a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml +++ b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml @@ -23,104 +23,106 @@ module G = Guestfs open Printf

From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> Callers are supposed to use the availability API to check for functions that may not be available in particular builds of libguestfs. If they don't do this, currently they tend to get obscure error messages, eg: libguestfs: error: zerofree: /dev/vda1: zerofree: No such file or directory This commit changes the error

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -------------- next part -------------- >From 28dd97c07f5fad1c374b71a96ec63ff836792b01 Mon Sep 17

Extract the guest kernel/ramdisk extraction from virt-builder into a separate utility, so it can be used and improved without cluttering virt-builder. Currently it does what virt-builder --get-kernel did, adding also the options for remote disks and libvirt access, much like other libguestfs tools. virt-builder --get-kernel now just spawns virt-get-kernel. --- .gitignore |

Add xfs_info to show the geometry of the xfs filesystem. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- Hi Rich, I got an odd error, can you help me with this error or give me a debug method? Thanks, Wanlong Gao daemon/Makefile.am | 1 + daemon/xfs.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/generator_actions.ml

At least libpython2.7-dev and libpython3.3-dev on current Debian/unstable ship with pkg-config files. As with the pkg-config check for Lua, we check for versioned and an unversioned .pc files. --- configure.ac | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- python/Makefile.am | 2 +- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index

Prune from the list of sources where to extract messages various sources with no messages: - .pl and .pm files, as they do not contain messages: almost all the .pl files are tests, and the only .pm file is the Perl Sys::Guestfs module, which wraps the XS extension - dummy.c sources; they are empty sources used to build OCaml-only targets using automake - gperf generated sources - C/OCaml

Instead of creating Guestfs handles and manually apply common options (e.g. debug and trace), use the open_guestfs in Common_utils. This also applies the common options to handles which didn't set them before, so we can inspect also their messages if needed. --- builder/builder.ml | 8 ++------ customize/customize_main.ml | 4 +--- dib/dib.ml | 4 +---

Try to improve the way packages of VMware tools are removed from YUM-based guests: - when filtering the package itself from its providers, do a stricter check so either the provide is the unversioned package, or it is exactly its own name - if the package has no other providers, then going further will cause the invocation of 'yum install' with no packages, and thus the package

Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > The LLVM libraries are not API stable (especially not the ones you generate with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS). Those libraries are really not intended to ship. I know that's why I need them versioned. Currently we (openSUSE) ship libLLVM package which will install libLLVMFooBar.so.3.7 files and llvm-devel

zerofree is a package that can take an ext2 (only?) filesystem, work out what parts of the filesystem are not used, and either zero them or sparsify them. This was useful in about 2009 when I added it to Fedora. However nowadays it's more convenient to use the equivalent kernel functionality (via the ‘fstrim’ command or equivalent ioctls). The kernel functionality also works correctly for

This new series condenses all of the previously posted patches into new patch 1/2. The second patch is a new fix for parallel build in the haskell directory.

Hi, For lllvm 3.7 and before BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON would produce versioned shared libs like libLLVMLTO.so (symlink) libLLVMLTO.so.3.7 (symlink) libLLVMLTO.so.3.7.0 (real file) now it just builds an unversioned libLLVMLTO.so file which I believe is a problem because when a program links to llvm it generates a runtime dependency on libLLVMLTO.so instead of libLLVMLTO.so.3.7.0 which will break

New --unversioned-names option to save extracted files just with their base name (i.e. "vmlinux", "initrd.img"). --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 17 +++++++++++++---- get-kernel/virt-get-kernel.pod | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml index 646a240..1523363 100644 ---

New --prefix option to specify a prefix for the extracted file names. --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- get-kernel/virt-get-kernel.pod | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml index 1523363..01297f0 100644 --- a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml +++ b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml @@

From: Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> This patch adds '--blocksize' command line option for virt-get-kernel tool. This option allows specifying disk sector size as described in 'guestfs_add_drive_opts' libguestfs API. --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 22 ++++++++++++---------- get-kernel/virt-get-kernel.pod | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10

Hi all, Can I ask if zerofree or resize2fs could also be applicable to ext4? Guestfish help of these two commands indicates that they are applicable to ext2/3. But ext4 is not covered in the help. However, I have tested these two commands in my Fedora 12 laptop, and it seems that both commands work well with ext4. So I don't quite understand why the help of these two commands only mention

On 10/08/2012 21:58, nut-upsuser-request at lists.alioth.debian.org wrote: >>> Arnaud Quette<aquette.dev<at> gmail.com> writes: >>>> 2012/6/3 Chris Rees<crees<at> freebsd.org>: >>>>> Hi all, >>>> Hi Chris, >>>> >>>>> After some research I've found that this device should run with the

Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? CentOS 6.7/Ext4 I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on this version of CentOS. thanks, -wes