similar to: Help Me! Disinstallazione wine!

dd if=/dev/null of=img5 bs=1 seek=2G dd if=/dev/null of=img6 bs=1 seek=2G mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 img5 img6 losetup /dev/loop4 img5 losetup /dev/loop5 img6 btrfs device scan mount -t btrfs /dev/loop4 dir umount dir losetup -d /dev/loop5 mount -t btrfs -o degraded /dev/loop4 dir umount dir losetup -d /dev/loop4 ioctl: LOOP_CLR_FD: Device or resource busy mkfs.ext3 /dev/loop4 mke2fs 1.39

i tried patch-wine-nvidia.sh but no luck. nvidia-xsettings says i'm not using an nvidia driver, i have nvidia.ko loaded and running, my xorg.conf says driver "nv". I'm not sure what the correct nvidia driver i should be using..I got SLi: True in xorg.conf. I tried using patch-wine-nvidia.sh but no luck. I have all the necessary .so files copied into /usr/lib32 and

# uname -a Linux dhcppc1 3.0.1-xxxx-std-ipv6-64 #1 SMP Sun Aug 14 17:06:21 CEST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux mkdir test5 cd test5 dd if=/dev/null of=img5 bs=1 seek=2G dd if=/dev/null of=img6 bs=1 seek=2G losetup /dev/loop2 img5 losetup /dev/loop3 img6 mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 btrfs device scan btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid:

Hi, the description of wikipedia matches the behavior of fdisk. Statements by hpa several years ago indicate that the relative start LBA of logical partitions is indeed a troublemaker between GRUB and SYSLINUX. --------------------------------------------------------------------- I created by help of fdisk this layout Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type ebr_fdisk.img1

I am on a Macbook 4,1 with 4GB ram and X3100 GPU running 10.5.6, VMware Fusion 2.0.2 and CxGames 7.2. I am trying to get Runes of Magic to run, and I think it has something to do with wine. I tried installing and running this game in win2k, winxp, and vista bottles and all yeilded the same result (the pic). I am not running any additional commands to the application (-dx8, -noshaders, etc). I

Thanks for all the input everyone. I can understand the problem more clearly now. Didier Spaier wrote: > Sorry if this is a silly question: why not use a GUID partition > table instead of using logical partitions? Not a silly question, I had the same idea and had tried it out but it didn't work (same error msg). Ady Ady wrote: > The typical (modern) "MBR" supports 4