Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Aimp3 webradios problem"
2010 Dec 19
0
[Bug 87] Last logon that gets reported upon login is the current login time
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87
Yann Rouillard <yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
2023 Jan 11
2
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
On 11/01/2023 12:35 p.m., RICHET Yann wrote:
> Thank you all, for these advices.
>
> So I try to fix OMP_THREADS, cleanup tests, and display explicitly what test is running by moving in tests/ instead of tests/testthat/...
> Next step should be to investigate blocking test using a reporter (maybe "list").
> For now, waiting for CRAN results...
I think Sebastian or my
2014 Oct 18
10
[Bug 2297] New: EDD25519 Signature verification failed on Solaris
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2297
Bug ID: 2297
Summary: EDD25519 Signature verification failed on Solaris
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.7p1
Hardware: amd64
OS: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2004 Aug 06
2
No sound (ices-2.0.0, RH9)
Thanks Geoff, it's becoming more clear to me now...
> So, assuming it does, you could try:
> aumix -w r
[yann@raglou yann]$ aumix -w R
[yann@raglou yann]$ aumix -q
vol 100, 100
pcm 100, 100
speaker 0, 0
line 0, 0, P
mic 4, 0, P
cd 0, 0, P
igain 0, 0, P
line1 0, 0, R
phin 0, 0, P
phout 0, 0
video 0, 0, P
No "R" on the pcm line, so that is probably the problem : my soundcard
2017 Apr 26
2
Server kicking clients off
It's behaving as it is meant to: if a listen client gets too far behind,
Icecast2 server is kicking them off.
error.log says,
"INFO source/source.c Client 120 (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) has fallen too far
behind, removing"
I don't see a setting in icecast.xml that sets the value for "too far
behind". I'm guessing it's related to <queue-size>.
I wish Icecast
2023 Jan 11
2
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Thank you all, for these advices.
So I try to fix OMP_THREADS, cleanup tests, and display explicitly what test is running by moving in tests/ instead of tests/testthat/...
Next step should be to investigate blocking test using a reporter (maybe "list").
For now, waiting for CRAN results...
Yann
-----Message d'origine-----
De?: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
2023 Jan 10
2
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Thank you for your answer.
In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned. But I cannot imagine this costs so much time just for that...
A deeper analysis of time spent seems to point that a large time was mainly spent on testthat and Rcpp dependencies compilation... But other recent packages depending on these also are not spending so much time.
2011 Mar 15
1
Problem with nls.lm function of minpack.lm package.
Dear R useRs,
I have a problem with nls.lm function of minpackl.lm package.
I need to fit the Van Genuchten Model to a set of data of Theta and hydraulic conductivity with nls.lm function of minpack.lm package.
For the first fit, the parameter estimates keep changing even after 1000 iterations (Th)
and
I have a following error message for fit of hydraulic conductivity (k);
Reason for
2004 Sep 28
2
wine: cannot determine executable type for L"C:\\Program Files\\lotus\\notes\\nlnotes.exe"
Hi all,
I'm tryong to have Notes running under Linux, but when I launch it I get
this error :
[yann@localhost yann]$ wine "c:\Program Files\lotus\notes\nlnotes.exe"
wine: cannot determine executable type for L"C:\\Program
Files\\lotus\\notes\\nlnotes.exe"
Anyone can help ??
Thanx
2011 Dec 07
2
problems when using dsync between servers
Hello,
I'm trying to migrate from maildir++ to mdbox. The maildir++ is a
leftover of our previous setup (was using courier)
We have 3 virtuals servers for our +70000 accounts.
Now, I'd like to use mdbox, so I'm trying using dsync for that. I setup
a new virtual server, configured for mdbox.
1st, I tried a basic setup: I established a file with all my accounts
(taken from LDAP)
2017 Apr 27
0
Server kicking clients off
Simply use VLC and put it on repeat. If a connection is lost during
playback, it will reconnect and pick up in the current live position, like
you have suggested, without stopping. If it cannot reconnect after 3
times, it goes to the next playlist item. If the playlist is on repeat, it
runs indefinitely.
Brad Isbell
brad at musatcha.com
http://www.musatcha.com
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:58 PM,
2014 Sep 07
3
[Bug 2271] New: Regression test #89 "fuzz Ed25519 sig" fails under Solaris
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2271
Bug ID: 2271
Summary: Regression test #89 "fuzz Ed25519 sig" fails under
Solaris
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.6p1
Hardware: All
OS: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component:
2005 Jul 08
4
Mtu/802.1Q limits on vif ??
Hello. I''m new to the list and I hope this is not a FAQ. I searched the
archives and didn''t find an answer...
Quick question :
Is there a limitation if the vif code cutting at 1500 bytes ??
I''m trying to implement an IPv6 router/Firewall (2 XenU)
Xen 2.0.6,
Linux 2.6 is used on xen0 and XenU.
The physical machine has 2 interfaces, eth0 (which is connected to an
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Le 10/01/2023 ? 11:37, Serguei Sokol a ?crit?:
> Le 10/01/2023 ? 10:44, RICHET Yann a ?crit?:
>> Dear R-devel people,
>>
>> We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a
>> C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo.
>> It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to
>> provide a python binding... so
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Le 10/01/2023 ? 10:44, RICHET Yann a ?crit?:
> Dear R-devel people,
>
> We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo.
> It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to provide a python binding... so there is a huge layer of cmake & scripting to make it work with a standard armadillo
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
On 10/01/2023 2:05 p.m., Ivan Krylov wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:27:53 +0000
> RICHET Yann <yann.richet at irsn.fr> wrote:
>
>> In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which
>> backs to two threads as warned.
>
> I think you're right about your tests de-facto using two threads, but
> it might be a good idea to _default_ to up to
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:27:53 +0000
RICHET Yann <yann.richet at irsn.fr> wrote:
> In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which
> backs to two threads as warned.
I think you're right about your tests de-facto using two threads, but
it might be a good idea to _default_ to up to two threads in tests and
examples. This is especially valuable for third-party
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
On 10/01/2023 4:07 p.m., Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> Am 10.01.23 um 21:28 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
>> On 10/01/2023 2:05 p.m., Ivan Krylov wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:27:53 +0000
>>> RICHET Yann <yann.richet at irsn.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which
>>>> backs to two threads as
2018 Sep 05
0
[RFC] UAPI: Check headers by compiling all together as C++
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 07:33:38PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le mercredi 05 septembre 2018 ? 18:55 +0200, Greg KH a ?crit :
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make
> > > sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together
2004 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [Opencxx-users] LLVM and OpenC++
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 03:35:36AM +0400, "Valery A.Khamenya" wrote:
> Hi Grzegorz,
>
> > Hard to say. What is "second breath"? Are you proposing a solution that
> > integrates OpenC++ with LLVM? Please elaborate.
>
> let's separate "what" and "how".
>
> I do not speak abot "how" right now, because it is rather