similar to: Memory problems/questions

Hi, Has kernel-2.6.18-128.1.1 support for IO statistic for example when using "pidstat -d"? Thanks in advance! -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin -

On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 22:08:51 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >  > > Yes, but it isn't doing a read, it is trying to do a write and then > > being cancelled. > > Rowland, > > Can you point us as the evidence that leads you to that conclusion?  OK, the OP posted

On Fri, 09 Nov 2018 07:40:23 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 09:29 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 22:08:51 +1300 > > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, but

Hi, > On Jul 7, 2020, at 18:37, Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Ah, that's important information I didn't have. Thank you! > > No problem, glad to help! > > To the rest of your thoughts, I certainly agree. One interesting question is why LAA > didn't use DA at all. Other than that, note that LAA is quite

Hi , The following loop fails to be vectorized since the load c[i] is casted as i64 and the store c[i] is double. The loop access analysis gives up since they are in different types. Since these two memory operations are in the same size, I believe the loop access analysis should return forward dependence and thus the loop can be vectorized. Any comments? Thanks, Jin #define N 1000 double

Hi! according to the Wine FAQ DirectX 9 is already implemented and you warn about installing the one from MS. When I try to install "newer" games (e.g. NFS - Most Wanted) the installer complains that DirectX 9.0c isn't installed. The same happened when I tried to install Drakensang. My installed wine version: 1.1.11 Thanks for any advice!

Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Their most important difference is that DA is used for compile-time / > static checks while LAA is mainly used for generating run-time checks. Ah, that's important information I didn't have. Thank you! > Now, as for unifying them, if we mean something other than just putting > them in the same file,

Hi everyone, I am in a real panic here and would appreciate any help. I have students not being able to save any files! I have a samba server that was joined to a win2k active directory and running for months. I dont know why, but now it isn't working correctly. This error is filling my logs: ------------------- libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_keytab_verify_ticket(113)

Hi Ashutosh, > On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > From: Adam Nemet [mailto:anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>] > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:48 AM > To: Nema, Ashutosh > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Loop

Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 > Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba >> during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD >> (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin

I have been looking into this small test case (Part A) where loop vectorization is disabled due to possible store-load forwarding conflict (Part B). As you can see, due to the presence of dependence distance 2 the loop is vectorizable only for a width of 2. However, the presence of dependence distance 15 (due to y[j-15]) results in store-load forwarding issue as store packet of y[16:17] (iteration

> On Mar 5, 2015, at 10:33 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > > > I am about to post the patches to make LAA suitable for Loop Distribution. As you will hopefully find this will make the LAA more generic. I will cc you on the patches. > > Sure Adam. > > RuntimeCheckEmitter > “RuntimeCheckEmitter::addRuntimeCheck” > While creating

Michael Kruse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > AFAIK they are independent developments. LoopAccessAnalysis was > extracted out of the LoopVectorizer in 2015, and first developed in > 2013 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d517976758c8674bdcd4c74457f7a83f20e432c5) > > DependenceAnalysis was a from-scratch implementation from 2012 >

Hello Wine Users, I am thinking about buying the game "Das schwarze Auge: Drakensang" (German homepage (http://www.dsa-game.de/), English homepage (http://www.drakensang.info/)). But I will only do it if I am able to play it under Linux. Does someone have the game already and tried to get it running with Wine? Regards, Benjamin

> On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:46 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > > Thanks Adam for your reply. > > From: Adam Nemet [mailto:anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 3:23 AM > To: Nema, Ashutosh > Cc: Hal Finkel; Philip Reames; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject:

Hi, I would like to replace the last tree characters of the values of a certain column in a dataframe. This replacement should only take place if the last three characters correspond to the value "/:/" and they should be replaced with ""(blank) I cannot perform a simple gsub because the characters /:/ might also be present somewhere else in the string values and then they

> On Mar 20, 2015, at 8:02 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > > > Yes, this is what I was proposing above and here ;): > Thanks Adam it’s for confirming J NP :). > > > No, not hasLoopInvariantStore but hasAccessToLoopInvariantAddress. > Its only for invariant stores[not loads], Using ‘hasLoopInvariantStore’ (or a name with invariant store)

Hello, could you please have a look at this code posted on godbolt.org: https://godbolt.org/z/O-O-Q7 The problem is that inside the compute function, only the first loop vectorizes while the rest copies of it don't. But if I remove any of the for loops, then the rest vectorize successfully. Could you please confirm that this is a bug, otherwise give me more insight on why the vectorization

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:57:04 -0800 Jeremy Allison via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:34:50AM +0300, Albert Berger via samba > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 06:12:40AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 15:19 +0300, Albert Berger via samba wrote: > > > >  > > > > I tried in sequence

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 08:54:11AM +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 > Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba > > during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD > > (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD