similar to: dramatic slow diskperformance

Hello, Don't know if this is related but I just got a segmentation fault today while trying to register my new SNOM200 phone: *CLI> *CLI> NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from '<sip:mattf2@10.10.10.15>' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from

I can also confirm that the latest https://hub.docker.com/_/r-base has the correct behaviour. On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:05 PM Kenny Bell <kmbell56 at gmail.com> wrote: > I was actually able to reproduce this on a relatively fresh install of > 18.04 (a virtualbox). Paul, did you run apt update && apt upgrade before > trying to reproduce? > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at

I made some simple comparisons about CPU usages between running Wine and running XP on a VirtualBox. In both cases, I ran exactly the same 2 applications with about the same configuration. The Wine I use is 1.3.26. The XP is XP Home with SP2 but trimmed down to nearly its bare-bones (having only the possibly minimum number of services running). The computer is a Dell Studio laptop with

I was actually able to reproduce this on a relatively fresh install of 18.04 (a virtualbox). Paul, did you run apt update && apt upgrade before trying to reproduce? On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:36 PM Kenny Bell <kmbell56 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I tried downgrading to R 3.4.4 and I still see the problem. I also have a > conda environment that doesn't exhibit

Hi all, I have been a Wine user since about 2002 and have even contributed a few simple patches, but this is my first time on the forum. Anyway, I just wanted to make it known that wine 1.3.20 provides a dramatic increase in performance. Scrolling in the iTunes Music store no longer reminds me of pouring molasses (finally) and Photoshop Elements 5 is usable. Does anyone know what the magic was and

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > Thanks for the reply Daniel, > > However I think you slightly misunderstood the scenario... > > On 14 November 2017 at 10:32, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > IOW, if your application has a certain expectation of performance that can only > > be satisfied by having the KVM guest

On 14 November 2017 at 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > Oh well THP usage inside the guest is then not really anything todo with > virt, just a regular Linux questions, so not sure libvirt is the best > place to ask. True, I just hoped you or one of the other devs might have some insight on reclaim behaviour that would provide a clue. I guess I'll try a

Dear R users/developers, simple comparison of code execution time of R 2.7.1 and R 2.7.2 shows a dramatic slowdown of the newer version. Rprof() identifies .Call function as a main cause (see the code below). What happened with R 2.7.2? Kind regards Marek Wielgosz Bayes Consulting ######### Probably useful info ############### ### CPU: Core2Duo T 7300, 2 GB RAM ### WIN XP ### both standard

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:23:56AM -0700, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > Hi all, > > This is not really a libvirt issue but I'm hoping some of the smart folks > here will know more about this problem... > > We have noticed when running some HPC applications on our OpenStack > (libvirt+KVM) cloud that the same application occasionally performs much > worse (4-5x slowdown)

Thanks for the reply Daniel, However I think you slightly misunderstood the scenario... On 14 November 2017 at 10:32, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > IOW, if your application has a certain expectation of performance that can only > be satisfied by having the KVM guest backed by huge pages, then you should > really change to explicitly reserve huge pages for the

Counter-Strike 1.6 is extremely slow for me, say, one frame per ten seconds. I am running Wine on Arch Linux 64 bits, I created my Wine prefix using Code: WINEARCH=win32 winecfg This is my direct rendering log: Code: trace:wgl:X11DRV_WineGL_InitOpenglInfo GL version : 2.1 Mesa 7.11.2. trace:wgl:X11DRV_WineGL_InitOpenglInfo GL renderer : Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GME/GLE

There are options that can help a little bit with the ls/find. Still, many devs will need to know your settings, so the volume's info is very important. Try the 'noatime,nodiratime' (if ZFS supports them). Also, as this is a new cluster you can try to setup XFS and verify if the issue is the same. RedHat provide an XFS options' calculator but it requires aby kind of subscription

Hi all I'm running since a couple of years a samba ver 3.0.33-3.29.el5_6.2 On a Red Hat 5 with kernel 2.6.18. Samba is member of a domain, with short name BNNAS03; some shares are using domain users, some are anonymous, open to a list of IPs. Suddenly is happening that, from my win7 computer is all ok if I call is with \\bnnas03 I see all shares, I can access and so on. If I call with

Hi all, This is not really a libvirt issue but I'm hoping some of the smart folks here will know more about this problem... We have noticed when running some HPC applications on our OpenStack (libvirt+KVM) cloud that the same application occasionally performs much worse (4-5x slowdown) than normal. We can reproduce this quite easily by filling pagecache (i.e. dd-ing a single large file to

Contrary to most who post to this list, I am not running Windows based games on my Linux OS. I have wine 1.2.1 running on my *ubuntu 10.10 system out of directory /usr/bin. I also had a newer version (probably 1.2.2) installed in another (unknown) directory. After reading <http://www.wine-reviews.net/wine-reviews/tips-n-tricks/a-guide-to-wine-on-ubuntu-for-beginners.html> I performed

Question: How to kill a Windows application that runs with wine? I have installed new stable version of wine for Debian. Then the Windows application starts OK but hangs for some reason (its the application logic fault). However I can't see any way to close the application window or to kill the application. I tried as in documentation: # wineserver -k bash: wineserver: command not found I

So, I installed Wine 20050111 and Winetools 2.1 on my desktop which is a P4 HT 3.4ghz ICH6 chipset based box. Redhat seems to function just fine on it, and I'm running the latest stable SMP Kernel. My problem is included in the following test. When I launch WineTools, it starts complaining about not being able to create directories and the such, but I'm running this as root (I can hear

Joachim, apologies again for bothering you, but after I sent the email below, I managed to link Xdialog in /usr/bin to /usr/local/Winetools to get Winetools to work (I'm still getting used to the 'peculiarities' of linux!). I went through the Base Setup procedure as advised, and it seemed to work 'mostly OK', but I think there is a problem with my glibc as you advised - a

I was wondering if anybody else had seen the following: I have a multiprocessor system (Intel P4). I use Wine to run the Tasking 56300 DSP compiler (Tasking, brilliant folks they are, *had* a Linux version, that they DROPPED support for!). Doing a build of a fairly large project (over a hundred files), with nothing much else going on, the compiles run very slowly, the system is at less than

First - Wine is great. I love it totally. To login into a company website I have to use IE6 - Firefox is not handling the Web Site due to some reglementations. IE6 runs fine and there are NO problems. Only after exit, the Wineserver keeps running and takes away a lot CPU Power. I can stop it manually (System Monitor -> Process. Right Click and I can stop it (and it relieves the Power from the