Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Wine produces lots of errors"
2010 Dec 01
2
Lattice dotplots
Dear,
I have a dataset with 4 subjects (see ID in example), and 4 treatment (see
TRT in example) which are tested on 2 locations and in 3 blocs. By using
Lattice dotplot, I made a graph that shows the raw data per location and
per bloc. In that graph, I would like to have a reference line per bloc
that refers to the first treatment (T1). However, I can not find how to do
that.
I can make
2011 Apr 19
4
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
hi all please could u help me in these points
1- I have installed llvm-gcc 4.2 and llvm 2.8 with the synaptic
package manager(ubuntu 10.10)
every time i do this commande:
llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc
it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5
when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file
as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me
2011 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
>> i would like to add the value of the size od a basic bloc to this
>>> global variable
>>> how to convert the size of a basic bloc to integer?
>>
>> Size = number of LLVM IR instructions there? If yes, just grab the
>> number, convert it to ConstantIn and use as an initializer / store to
>> variable.
>>
>
> There's a typo in the
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>
> Hi Nabila,
>
> > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc
>
> you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic
> block.
> However you can try to insert the call before the terminator.
>
Yes, i mean before the termininator,
My problem is how to call a method
suppose
2001 Nov 26
1
EXT3 crash: ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared
I had a failure over the weekend of
my ext3 filesystems.
Hardware:
Dell 2550 (dual PIII 1 Ghz, 1GB ram, Acenic GigE card)
Software:
linux-2.4.14
ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414
Trond's NFS patches (pathconf, tune,read,rpc_blk)
The filesystem is RAID0 using LVM (1.0.1-rc4).
The disks are connected using fiber channel
(qlogic 2200, qlax00-4.27beta).
I was generating high load on my nfs
2004 Sep 22
1
layout for xyplot
Dear all,
I tried to use layout argument in xyplot to get one panel per page.
I have a dataframe named 'data' with the following variables:
x, y = coords,
sub, bloc = 2-level factors,
etat = 5-level factor,
I did :
> lset(theme = col.whitebg())
> xyplot(y ~ x | bloc*sub , data=data, groups=etat,
+ layout=c(0,1,4),
+ main="Etat des plantes dans chaque
2007 Aug 04
2
multiple nls - next fit even after convergence problem
Hello R-gurus,
I'm trying to adjust different growth curves to a rather extensive dataset.
I wrote up a function to go through all of them, but am encountering a problem :
among the more than 1000 curves I have, obviously for some of them I encounter conversion problems.
I'd like for my function to keep going to the next curve and store the fact that for curve number X I had a convergence
2011 Apr 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
On 4/19/11 4:37 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>> llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc
>> it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5
>> when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file
>> as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me
>> invalid signature.
> There is no llvm-gcc 4.5. Report this bug to Ubuntu,
2013 Jul 16
1
make efi64 install in syslinux-6.02-pre3 fail
> If the Windows OS is running and a program is checking for an optical
> disc drive, then you really need one of:
> - A physical optical disc drive with the expected disc
> - A virtual optical disc drive with the expected disc
>
> Are you using either of these right now? If you are using a physical
> OD, does it have a Syslinux EFI on it? If you are [thinking about]
2011 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila,
> My problem is how to call a method
> suppose this fucntion
> void A(int x)
> {
> x=x+1;
>
> }
>
> should i define this function and declare it at the beginig of the module and
> create for it a basic bloc?
you can just declare the function (i.e. no need to give it a body), and call it.
You can then link with an object file that defines it. This is
2011 May 20
0
[LLVMdev] convert a char * to a value
On 5/20/11 5:46 PM, Nabila ABDESSAIED wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type
> char *:
> void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){
> ---
> --
> }
> i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc:
> to add it into a basic bloc i do:
The problem is that you are passing arrays to the function instead of
2004 Sep 21
1
bubble plots
Dear all,
I'm used to draw bubble plots (gstat) to get a first view of my spatial
marked data, but I can't find a way to label legend with marks after having
replaced them by a numeric scale.
I have a data frame with numeric coords and factors:
> names(data)
[1] "x" "y" "bloc" "sub" "inoc"
2011 May 20
3
[LLVMdev] convert a char * to a value
Hi all,
Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type char *:
void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){
---
--
}
i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc:
to add it into a basic bloc i do:
//i: is the basic bloc
std::vector<Value*> void_43_params;
Constant* tbname = ConstantArray::get(M.getContext(),i->getNameStr() ,
true);
Constant* pbname =
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
I have defined the fucntion in another object file and linked it to the
in fact the fucntion is :
void consume(int , int * );
std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params;
int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);//inValue is ConstantInt* inValue
int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y);
CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume, int32_16_params.begin(),
int32_16_params.end(), "",
2011 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
> llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc
> it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5
> when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file
> as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me
> invalid signature.
There is no llvm-gcc 4.5. Report this bug to Ubuntu, because it seems
they hacked the stuff somehow.
> i would like to add
2010 Feb 26
1
factorial block design with missing data
Hello!
I have read somewhere (somehow, I can't seem to find it again, it's been a couple of months) that when analyzing factorial block design, the position where you put the block factor is important, even more when there are missing values.
I understand that when using anova.lm, the order is sequential, so that if I want to check for a treatment effect, I should put my blocking factor
2012 Aug 07
4
Execution of a function
Hi
>i have aproblem withe execution of my function
>first, i wrote my function in the script of R
>nom_fonction <- function(arg1[=expr1], arg2[=expr2], ...){
bloc d'instructions
}
> when i want to have the result i mean the laste instruction in the bloc of
> instruction , i try to
>wrote the name of function
>source(aj.fun)
Error in readLines(file, warn =
2012 Jan 12
2
is there an equivalent for #ifdef (C langage) in R
Hi,
I'd like to know if there is an equivalent for #ifdef (Clangage) in R. I 'd
like to do something like:
useDebug = defmacro(DEBUG, expr=(DEBUG==1))
if(useDebug(0)){
#Here I do not use debug mode
make_addition = function(a, b) {
c=a+b
plot(c)
return(c)
}
}else{
#here I use debug mode
c=a+b
}
I assume this would work... The problem is :
if
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
hi all,
i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc
the fucntion i have defined and declared at the begining of the module
ie i have written a pass derived from a module pass
virtual bool runOnModule(Module & M){
// i declared the fucntion and defined it
for (Module::iterator a = M.begin(), b = M.end(); a != b;
for (Function::iterator i = a->begin(), e =
2011 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila,
> i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc
you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic block.
However you can try to insert the call before the terminator.
...
> i tried to see an example with the demo, i saw that it instead of calling the
> function, it repeats all the instruction that are existing in the function
>