similar to: Wine produces lots of errors

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Wine produces lots of errors"

2010 Dec 01
2
Lattice dotplots
Dear, I have a dataset with 4 subjects (see ID in example), and 4 treatment (see TRT in example) which are tested on 2 locations and in 3 blocs. By using Lattice dotplot, I made a graph that shows the raw data per location and per bloc. In that graph, I would like to have a reference line per bloc that refers to the first treatment (T1). However, I can not find how to do that. I can make
2011 Apr 19
4
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
hi all please could u help me in these points 1- I have installed llvm-gcc 4.2 and llvm 2.8 with the synaptic package manager(ubuntu 10.10) every time i do this commande: llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me
2011 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
>>  i would like to add the value of  the size od a basic bloc to this >>> global variable >>> how to convert the size of a basic bloc to integer? >> >> Size = number of LLVM IR instructions there? If yes, just grab the >> number, convert it to ConstantIn and use as an initializer / store to >> variable. >> > > There's a typo in the
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc > > you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic > block. > However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. > Yes, i mean before the termininator, My problem is how to call a method suppose
2001 Nov 26
1
EXT3 crash: ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared
I had a failure over the weekend of my ext3 filesystems. Hardware: Dell 2550 (dual PIII 1 Ghz, 1GB ram, Acenic GigE card) Software: linux-2.4.14 ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414 Trond's NFS patches (pathconf, tune,read,rpc_blk) The filesystem is RAID0 using LVM (1.0.1-rc4). The disks are connected using fiber channel (qlogic 2200, qlax00-4.27beta). I was generating high load on my nfs
2004 Sep 22
1
layout for xyplot
Dear all, I tried to use layout argument in xyplot to get one panel per page. I have a dataframe named 'data' with the following variables: x, y = coords, sub, bloc = 2-level factors, etat = 5-level factor, I did : > lset(theme = col.whitebg()) > xyplot(y ~ x | bloc*sub , data=data, groups=etat, + layout=c(0,1,4), + main="Etat des plantes dans chaque
2007 Aug 04
2
multiple nls - next fit even after convergence problem
Hello R-gurus, I'm trying to adjust different growth curves to a rather extensive dataset. I wrote up a function to go through all of them, but am encountering a problem : among the more than 1000 curves I have, obviously for some of them I encounter conversion problems. I'd like for my function to keep going to the next curve and store the fact that for curve number X I had a convergence
2011 Apr 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
On 4/19/11 4:37 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc >> it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 >> when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file >> as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me >> invalid signature. > There is no llvm-gcc 4.5. Report this bug to Ubuntu,
2013 Jul 16
1
make efi64 install in syslinux-6.02-pre3 fail
> If the Windows OS is running and a program is checking for an optical > disc drive, then you really need one of: > - A physical optical disc drive with the expected disc > - A virtual optical disc drive with the expected disc > > Are you using either of these right now? If you are using a physical > OD, does it have a Syslinux EFI on it? If you are [thinking about]
2011 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > My problem is how to call a method > suppose this fucntion > void A(int x) > { > x=x+1; > > } > > should i define this function and declare it at the beginig of the module and > create for it a basic bloc? you can just declare the function (i.e. no need to give it a body), and call it. You can then link with an object file that defines it. This is
2011 May 20
0
[LLVMdev] convert a char * to a value
On 5/20/11 5:46 PM, Nabila ABDESSAIED wrote: > Hi all, > > Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type > char *: > void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){ > --- > -- > } > i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc: > to add it into a basic bloc i do: The problem is that you are passing arrays to the function instead of
2004 Sep 21
1
bubble plots
Dear all, I'm used to draw bubble plots (gstat) to get a first view of my spatial marked data, but I can't find a way to label legend with marks after having replaced them by a numeric scale. I have a data frame with numeric coords and factors: > names(data) [1] "x" "y" "bloc" "sub" "inoc"
2011 May 20
3
[LLVMdev] convert a char * to a value
Hi all, Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type char *: void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){ --- -- } i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc: to add it into a basic bloc i do: //i: is the basic bloc std::vector<Value*> void_43_params; Constant* tbname = ConstantArray::get(M.getContext(),i->getNameStr() , true); Constant* pbname =
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
I have defined the fucntion in another object file and linked it to the in fact the fucntion is : void consume(int , int * ); std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params; int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);//inValue is ConstantInt* inValue int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y); CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume, int32_16_params.begin(), int32_16_params.end(), "",
2011 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc
> llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc > it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 > when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file > as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me > invalid signature. There is no llvm-gcc 4.5. Report this bug to Ubuntu, because it seems they hacked the stuff somehow. >  i would like to add
2010 Feb 26
1
factorial block design with missing data
Hello! I have read somewhere (somehow, I can't seem to find it again, it's been a couple of months) that when analyzing factorial block design, the position where you put the block factor is important, even more when there are missing values. I understand that when using anova.lm, the order is sequential, so that if I want to check for a treatment effect, I should put my blocking factor
2012 Aug 07
4
Execution of a function
Hi >i have aproblem withe execution of my function >first, i wrote my function in the script of R >nom_fonction <- function(arg1[=expr1], arg2[=expr2], ...){ bloc d'instructions } > when i want to have the result i mean the laste instruction in the bloc of > instruction , i try to >wrote the name of function >source(aj.fun) Error in readLines(file, warn =
2012 Jan 12
2
is there an equivalent for #ifdef (C langage) in R
Hi, I'd like to know if there is an equivalent for #ifdef (Clangage) in R. I 'd like to do something like: useDebug = defmacro(DEBUG, expr=(DEBUG==1)) if(useDebug(0)){ #Here I do not use debug mode make_addition = function(a, b) { c=a+b plot(c) return(c) } }else{ #here I use debug mode c=a+b } I assume this would work... The problem is : if
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
hi all, i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc the fucntion i have defined and declared at the begining of the module ie i have written a pass derived from a module pass virtual bool runOnModule(Module & M){ // i declared the fucntion and defined it for (Module::iterator a = M.begin(), b = M.end(); a != b; for (Function::iterator i = a->begin(), e =
2011 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic block. However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. ... > i tried to see an example with the demo, i saw that it instead of calling the > function, it repeats all the instruction that are existing in the function >