similar to: 8800 Ultra support?

I'm getting the below error when trying to compile the latest git. gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtype-limits -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o registrar.o registrar.c registrar.c: In function 'DllGetClassObject': registrar.c:747: error:

On Mon Jun 2 23:28:45 2025 Jeffrey Walton <noloader at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 5:34?PM Mark Foley via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: [snip] > > 1) Users are set to "change password on next login" or when passwords expire on > > the Windows 11 workstations the users cannot reset their passwords. As sysadmin > > I

On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:49 PM, John Regehr wrote: > Has anyone quantified the optimizations afforded by undefined signed > overflow? I'd expect that the benefits are minimal for most codes. In most cases, I agree. But for codes that depend heavily on dependence analysis, I would think that being conservative with index expressions would really kill any disambiguation capability and

Problem LLVM's memory model for NonAtomic accesses is generally fairly weak, but explicitly disallows inserting stores that didn't occur in the original program.  This is required for any potentially shared location, but is overkill for any memory location which is provably only accessed by a single thread. My particular motivating example is a single thread private field in our

Hello, I am new to R and am having difficulty formatting numerical output from a regression analysis. My code iteratively performs linear regression on a dataset while excluding certain data ranges. My code: rm(list = ls(all = TRUE)) sink("outfile") dat <- read.table("testdat", sep="\t", header=TRUE) int = 0.2 for (x in c(0:20)) { subdat <- subset(dat, time

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20031023/8142d4e0/attachment-0002.htm -------------- next part -------------- This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 5:34?PM Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed May 21 02:51:51 2025 Luis Peromarta via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > In 20 minutes. > > > > http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:start > > On 21 May 2025 at 08:13 +0200, samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>,

Any help would be most appreciated. (Don't make me get down on my hands and knees and beg for help, cause I'll do it!!) My boss has me learning R and doing nested regression with the report due Mon (Friday night statistics...fun. ). Anyway, here's my problem: In a regression equation not accounting for the fact that people are nested in families, the result for Z variable is VERY

Here is a simple loop: long foo(int len, long* s) { long sum = 0; for (int i=0; i<len; i++) sum += s[i*12]; return sum; } There is a multiplication in each loop iteration. Can this be turned into addition, and is there already a pass that does? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_reduction uses this very situation as an example in the opening paragraph: "In

> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 07:03:49 -0800 > From: "Jorge Silva (Jorge Gomes da Silva)" <jorgesil@microsoft.com> > To: "'samba@samba.anu.edu.au'" <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> > Subject: /etc/passwd - Domain Controller Synchronization > Message-ID: <A1A4DA3CD56ECF11973200805F685F1680F51B@LIS-01-MSG> > > Hello, > > I don't know

Hi, I am trying to model a dataset with the response variable Y, which has 6 levels { Great, Greater, Greatest, Weak, Weaker, Weakest}, and predictor variables X, with continuous and factor variables using random forests in R. The variable Y acts like an ordinal variable, but I recoded it as factor variable. I ran a simulation and got OOB estimate of error rate 60%. I validated against some

Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > Hi, > >>> That's surprising to me. I thought there was a pass that converts >>> malloc's that trivially dominate all free's and whose pointer doesn't >>> escape would be lowered to alloca's -- but I looked and couldn't find >>> one. > > I implemented a pass like this a while back. It's

Hi, I have a question regarding this method, as i have discovered a case where it seems very far from 'strict'. I had two MI's, A and B, where A is !isSafeToMove(): A B TwoAddress pass changes the order to B A , as it reschedules the LastKill MI (B). Is this a bug in TwoAdress, or is it the case that isSafeToMove() is weaker than isSchedulingBoundary() so that these indirect

Hello, I just want to ask if it has been considered to use OpenSSL for the encryption stuff. I guess they've spent quite some time on the subject and have the cipher routines both debugged and optimized. I know that some of the current cipher code was taken from SSLeay but since OpenSSL is de facto SSLeay successor, it might give tinc more flexibility and allow the user to choose

This may sound crazy but... I have data like this... > results.matrix [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12] [1,] 949 93 2 11 26 20 7 6 10 5 0 3 [2,] 1233 124 24 35 58 57 17 21 31 19 11 21 Which is the result of binning (summing) the response variables of an underlying (nearly) continious range of predictor

Hello all, I've become confused by the output produced by a call to anova(model1,model2). First a brief background. My model used to predict final tree height is summarised here: Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) Treatment 2 748.35 374.17 21.3096 7.123e-06 *** HeightInitial 1 0.31 0.31 0.0178 0.89519

Hello, I am still trying to get you a dump from my brother's 8800 (because the dumps page says that you have never received one). The computer has a nVidia Corporation GeForce 8800 GT (rev a2) and I am running Koala's script. It compiles and runs through most of the tests properly, but consistently hangs indefinitely on the 79th test until I press Ctrl+C and quit the program. The

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:39:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Should we start putting litmus tests for the various examples > somewhere, perhaps in a litmus-tests directory within each participating > architecture? I have a pile of powerpc-related litmus tests on my laptop, > but they probably aren't doing all that much good there. Yeah, or a version of them in C that we

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:39:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Should we start putting litmus tests for the various examples > somewhere, perhaps in a litmus-tests directory within each participating > architecture? I have a pile of powerpc-related litmus tests on my laptop, > but they probably aren't doing all that much good there. Yeah, or a version of them in C that we

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20031022/5e14e7a1/attachment-0002.htm -------------- next part -------------- This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content