similar to: How do I get my wine applications to carry over users?

Good morning. I am Brazilian and I have a lot of time tracking the development of WINE. It's amazing what we can do with it ... But I'm having trouble configuring it. I have a domain network with 2003 server and use openSUSE as a client. The problem is the WINE configuration creates the folder with the installation of programs in the folder "/ home / <username>", which

FAQ is strongly not recommending to run wine as a root, but why is that? What should I do if I want to use FAR Manager (http://www.farmanager.com/) for system administration?

I've been playing around with llvm lately and I was wondering something about the bitcode instructions for basic arithmetic. Is there any plan to provide instructions that perform widening multiply, or add with carry? It might be written as: mulw i32 %lhs %rhs -> i64 ; widening multiply addw i32 %lhs %rhs -> i33 ; widening add addc i32 %lhs, i32 %rhs, i1 %c -> i33 ; add with carry

hay.. how to make all the applications installed in wine can be used by all users on Fedora 15? thanks

05.07.2020, 05:22, "Roman Lebedev" <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Shawn Landden via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>  Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more. >> >>  This proposal is to add a

Hello R folks, I'm hoping the answer to the question in the subject line. I have in the past used SAS PROC NLIN and PROC NLP to carry out nonlinear optimizations. I'm wondering if there is analogous ways for doing this using R. If so, could someone please point me to some literature that would help me examine this further? Thanks very much. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have a large list of programs which I would like to provide to all users using the computer automatically, without having to do any setup or put them into the user's home folder. Anyone have any ideas on how to do this?

I installed Quicken 2011 in Wine 1.2.3 under a Linux MINT12 System. I am the Administrator. All went well. I then installed a second user - my wife. In her menu there was a Wine. BUT her wine does not have Quicken 2011. I tried to install Quicken under her login but ran into all sorts of problems - Mainly this dumb Com Error thing. QUESTION: Since I install Quicken as administrator how do I

I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the following: 1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so) 2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or interpreter) 3. can compile/interpret C/C++ sources _BASED_ on type info in precompiled bc Motivation: The class files produced by the java compiler

Hello, all experts, My major is computer-aied drug design ( main QSAR). Now, my paper need be reviesed, and one reviewer ask me do genetic algorithm coupled with gaussian process method (GA+GP). my data: training set: 191*106 test set: 73*106 here, I need use GA+GP to do variable selection when building the model. In R, there are not GA package like in matlab

I'm trying to work out LLVM code which generates something similar to the following when adding large multiword numbers stored as separate words: ADD x1 x1 ADC x2 y2 ADC x3 y3 etc, where such a three argument add like ADC on x86 (which includes a carry in the addition) is available as a machine op. The background to this is that I'm trying to implement fast multiword addition in

On 05.07.20 12:21, Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev wrote: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Shawn Landden via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more. >> >> This proposal is to add a

I don't know if this has been talked about much in the past, but I was wondering if CentOSplus could be used to carry the latest stable versions of the GUI applications KDE/Gnome. These apps often lag behind quite a bit even on the selected stable branch upstream has chosen. For example, would it decrease stability to update KDE from 3.5.4 to 3.5.8? I think it would add to stability as long

(As per IRC discussion) I understand that the carry-less multiplication algorithm has it's uses since/and it is implemented as an instruction in many architectures and that adding it as a general-purpose intrinsic will allow us to drop target-specific intrinsics as by-product. What i do *NOT* understand is: what is the actual/main goal/driving factor of adding an LLVM intrinsic for it? The

Hello, respekt to your whole work on the Wine Project. But i have tried to make many Windows applications running with wine but nothing is working expecting the apps that are delivered with the wine package. I've tested it with an Ubuntu 10.04, 10.10, 11.04, 11.10 -> Nothing! I have used winetricks -> Nothing! Are there any hints to get, for example, the Amazon Kindle or the Evernote

<div> </div><div><div><p>Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more.</p><p>This proposal is to add a <code>llvm.clmul</code> instruction. Or if that is contentious, <code>llvm.experimental.bitmanip.clmul</code> instruction.

There is also the OptimizeR project on R-forge http://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=395. Other related projects are there also, but I'll let their authors speak for themselves. Stefan Theussl did a good job in the Task View, but it is from last June, and it would be a monumental effort to keep up to date with all the work going on. We're "almost" ready to put some of our

I would appreciate any information about how to carry out a hierarchical cluster analysis with cluster of subjects. I need to find cluster of subjects that share many variables. I know that fcp package have a lot of options to carry out the regular hierarchical cluster analysis (cluster of variables). Thank´s in advance Juan Hernández Facultad de Psicología La Laguna University Canary Islands

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Misha Brukman wrote: >> But since llvm's type system is meant to be lang indep the best we can >> do is to make debugging info descriptive enough for future >> compilations, is this correct? > That sounds about right. Another issue is that currently, aggressive > optimizations change the code substantially and if there were increased > debug

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:34:07AM -0500, Zeyu Chen wrote: > I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to > build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the > following: > > 1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so) You can do this today, e.g., with lli -load=native.so file.bc > 2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or