similar to: perfomance issue with bricscad

Hello, I run Mandrakelinux 10.1 with wine-20040813-2mdk. I have BricsCAD version 5.1.0012-1 installed. Upon start, I get this wine error message: can't open file icad.log error=5 (Access to icad.log was denied) [pablo@localhost bricscad]$ /opt/bricscad/bcad.sh fixme:ole:CoRegisterMessageFilter stub fixme:ole:RegisterTypeLib Registering non-oleautomation interface!

We are developing a VB 6.0 application to work with BricsCad (last linux version). But when I try to connect to BricsCad in Linux using the VB application it hangs the system. But if I do the same in Windows it works perfectly. Wine doesn't throw any error message, just hang the computer. Please help me!! Gabriel.

ghenao@gmail.com wrote on Sept 15, 2005: > We are developing a VB 6.0 application to work with BricsCad (last linux version). > But when I try to connect to BricsCad in Linux using the VB > application it hangs the system. But if I do the same in Windows it > works perfectly. > Wine doesn't throw any error message, just hang the computer. > We use SuSE 9.3 64 bits, and wine

bricscad v7 just came out. I tried the 'classic' version, and oddly enough, it seems to run fine in the latest wine from cvs. (Probably runs just as well in 0.9.16.) Has anyone else tested it harder than I did? - Dan

I have decided that the best course of action for me to get BricsCAD running on my system ( Mandriva2005LE - essentials updated ) is to clean my system of wine and start afresh. I have uninstalled wine and associated programs ( crossXover - winetools - xwine ) but upon updating my database ( slocate -u ) I still see heaps of entries for wine. eg. /usr/local/lib/wine

Hi All, I am running Debain|testing, and have a problem with BricsCAD. I downloaded the rpm from http://www.bricscad.com, and used alien to convert to a deb. All seemed ok, but a doubleclick on the icon gave no result. With everything installed, I could read the readme. The definitive statement appeared to be: "This version will not run with WINE releases older than september 2005" I

Hi, I'm running bricscad V9 (CAD application) under wine-1.1.28. All installation and functionality is OK, but performance is really poor with respect to the same app. on the same machine under Windows XP. So I think it's wine's fault. I checked for performance issues on the www, but I found no help. I also noticed the claim that NO performance fall-off should be expected and this is

To help the bug list out I'm about to update wine from *20050830 <http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=353003> to **20050930 <http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=360902> . My concerns here is that I do this correctly to ensure I get a helpful result, but : 1. I have BricsCAD for Linux installed and know that if I go for a clean install

Hi. We are looking for a way to query the contents of a registry (regedit) in a remote windows machine. Currently the command "querymultiplevalues" works if I set the complete key path like this 'querymultiplevalues "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Winrar archiver" DisplayName' but for our application to work, we need a way to query the path:

Hi, I use K-Meleon under wine as browser, and Thunderbird (linux version) as mail client. When I click on a link in Thunderbird, K-Meleon is opened, but the parameter isn't sent, instead of it I have just '%u', the parameter I have put on the line in default programs to say to pass the real parameter. K-Meleon receive %u and modify the address to http://www.%u.com/ Is it a

The Wine development release 2.15 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Support for AES encryption. - Improved Bezier support in Direct2D. - Chunked transfer improvements in WinInet. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations: http://dl.winehq.org/wine/source/2.x/wine-2.15.tar.xz

The Wine development release 2.22 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Source selection dialog for scanners. - Improvements in ARM64 support. - Float audio formats with more than 2 channels in XAudio. - Fixes for DLL injection support. - Input methods improvements. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

Most of them bases on latestest Qemu. The modifications are the below: Adding logic in ne2000_update_irq() avoids exceptional logic. Another modification is the ne2000_can_receive(), "if (index < boundary)" -> "if (index <= boundary)". Others based on lastest Qemu. But the latest Qemu adds new features, which not been added in the patch. The qemu uses polling

Good afternoon. Performance problems when opening drawings Kompas V13/autocad 2010 with resource Samba. When simply copying speed 11.2MB / s. And to read and write to Samba. Next I mount resource Samba, as a network ROM for Windows 7 Pro x64. When opening a drawing for editing , there a large number of small requests . Kompas / autocad not cache the file, and read his blocks , often and quickly.

I have at home two centos boxes: Box A - centos 6.4. gui version Box B - centos 7.1. minimal version. They are connected to 100Mb router (both boxes have 100Mb network adapters). Box B has software raid 1 and sata II interfaces.?On box B samba4 is installed and I copy files to samba share ( from box A to box B). Network monitor (iptraf-ng) shows only 20000 kbps of this copying operation. That is

Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 08:31 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Here my samba conf file: > > [global] > > workgroup = MYGROUP > server string = Samba Server Version %v > > interfaces = lo eth0 x.x.x.x/x #my ip and mask > hosts allow = 127. 10.0. > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > max log size = 50 > > security =

Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 17:38 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Thank you for your time. What network did you test it? > 100Mb or 1000Mb? I'm using 1Gbit here at home. With a 100Mbit connection it wouldn't be possible to reach transfer rates of 110MB/Sec. A realistic good transfer rate for a 100Mbit connection is just around 11 MB/Sec. Regards, Marc

How big is difference between encoding speeds of libspeex compiled with arm-asm, and without it? My application is written in EVC++, but there is no inline assembler, so I have to compile speex without arm-asm. But I still trying to find a way to use speex with arm-asm under my EVC++ application. I tried to compile speex with arm-asm under gcc (arm-wince-pe), but generated static link

On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:15 -0500, tom abcd wrote: > I am using speex on a Philips LPC2138 Arm 7 processor and have hit two > compiler warnings when using FIXED_POINT and the Arm 4 asm code. > > In cb_search.c get a warning on the call to compute_weighted_codebook of: > "passing arg 2 of 'compute_weighted_codebook' from incompatible pointer type' OK, I forgot to

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 10:33 -0500, tom abcd wrote: > > OK, I forgot to update the ARM4 code. That should definitely be fixed > > (otherwise it's not going to work). > > If this is not going to work then why does it work on my Arm? Any > quick fix I can do for now? Didn't you mention you were only using the decoder? That function is used in the encoder only. > is