similar to: South Park PC emulating (Weird error)

On 02/03/16 22:47, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: > Not really, a virtual environment can easily emulate the BIOS_timer at 0x046C > but it has problems emulating a "real" timer interrupt to be hooked... > That's the real problem. The timer interrupt works fine in at least KVM, Xen, VMware, and Hyper-V. (I've tested iPXE in all of those virtual environments, and

On 03/03/16 09:18, Patrick Masotta wrote: >>>> How so? > > it says they cannot emulate the timer interrupt very well; > that's what I understood... If it's the VMware document I'm thinking of (titled "Timekeeping in VMware Virtual Machines"), then the issue is that emulating the timer interrupt can cause a heavy load on the host if the guest timer is

On 03/03/16 09:45, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > At the BIOS standard rate of 18.2Hz, no modern machine is even going to > > notice. > > I think they do when running a VM, > > That's why my Debian VM date is always indicating whatever, > no matter how many times I reset the time of the day. > (Running on a i7-3630QM host) > For some reason they cannot emulate a

> > There are quite a few; primarily we simply cannot make lwIP > (lpxelinux.0) work without it. However, pxelinux.0 should not depend on > this. I'm finding most of the problems on lpxelinux.0 > >Now, tickful timekeeping is wasteful, but this is a bootloader, and >functionality is the main concern. The "tickless" version still >depended on the BIOS

>>> > Not really, a virtual environment can easily emulate the BIOS_timer at 0x046C > but it has problems emulating a "real" timer interrupt to be hooked... > That's the real problem. The timer interrupt works fine in at least KVM, Xen, VMware, and Hyper-V. (I've tested iPXE in all of those virtual environments, and iPXE relies on the timer interrupt

I tried to emulate the axis interval calculation behaviour of the traditional graphics system (with par(xaxs="i")) in lattice but couldn't find a flexible solution. Let's say a have a simple xyplot: x <- seq(0, 1, 0.01) xyplot(x^2 ~ x, type="l") I want to restrict the plotting region to the data range _and_ have axis labels over the full data range like this:

>>>How so? it says they cannot emulate the timer interrupt very well; that's what I understood...

>>> At the BIOS standard rate of 18.2Hz, no modern machine is even going to notice. Michael <<< I think they do when running a VM, That's why my Debian VM date is always indicating whatever, no matter how many times I reset the time of the day. (Running on a i7-3630QM host) For some reason they cannot emulate a good timer interrupt. Best, Patrick

Before 6.X Syslinux used a "Tick-less" timekeeping approach implemented in /core/bios.inc 6.X now implements a "Tick-counting" strategy (timer interrupt) implemented in /core/timer.inc I think this change presents issues when Sysylinux runs on Virtual Machines emulating a BIOS environment as they cannot correctly emulate the timer interrupt; see VMware's pdf:

A common need in R frontends is to provide some sort of read, (parse), evaluate, print loop. However, there are also a number of points where frontends may want to differ from the standard REPL as available e.g. in R_ReplDLLdo1(). First some thoughts on what is needed, and what is already there, or missing. If you want to skip over this, a short summary is provided in the second half, below

hi, yes we are talking about same host here. You could've just used -cpu host-model-only >> I dont want to host model ( it is working with host model) . AS KVM seems to allow support Haswell with native commands . Does this mean in my case KVM is allowing software emulated cpu model. Can libvirt allow software-emulated for non host model ? if yes how . thanks On Tue, Jan 24,

Technically, it could've sent the mail before you even thought about writing it. Undefined is undefined, there are no requirements. From: Dustin Laurence Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 6:50 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is this a bug in clang? On 04/19/2011 10:50 PM, John Regehr wrote: > The compiler is perfectly within its rights to send a rude email to your >

Hi, I am having a very weird problem with call parking. I have defined call parking correctly, as it work well when parking calls and picking them up. The problem is what happens after the the 45 seconds have expired. The behavior wanted is that the person who put the call on "park" is called back after 45 seconds. What ACTUALLY happens is that the phone who got put on park

On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:34 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Howard, high-level feedback from you would be particularly appreciated as I would love to contribute this to libc++ when the time is right. Does the enclosed implementation implement this part of N3333: http://www.open-std.org/Jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3333.html#per.process.seed ? That to me seems like potentially the most

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone else experiencing very slow SVN checkouts/updates? I've tried > from two separate networks now, and checkouts are 15+ minutes on both. > > -- > It could've been a temporary hiccup. Just updated and it was reasonably fast (given the large changes from Chandler's

Hi! I'm using latest hg from the 1.1 branch, and noticed that since yesterday's updates, dovecot randomly disconnects clients when using imap, with these message in the log: "Disconnected for inactivity in reading our output bytes=153/41319" This happens randomly. Eg. I'm fetching messages, and suddenly, dovecot disconnects. Or my MUA just sits there, and then again,

> > The internal DNS is NOT supporting round robin. As Rowland said use Bind9 > That's news to me! If so, then the internal DNS backed is not suitable for multiple DC's. (Though, I could've sworn it worked on versions 4.2+ < 4.7. It's on my to-do list to explore this further with different versions.)

I submitted a version of testenc.c to this list MONTHS ago that fixed this problem. It uses a reconfigurable group delay. If you had given me cvs access I could've committed the changes myself. Anyway, the file is attached (again). Maybe this time you'll actually notice the email. Sorry if I seem a little short. It's just very annoying to put the time into learning and improving a

>>> > > Aside from potentially needing smaller buffers for config files before > parsing (which seems trivial and unnecessary), what other benefits are > there to this strategy? > At the core, is that Syslinux is a general bootloader which gives access to a virtual filesystem.? It supports multiple open files, but not seeking or writing. <<< Please correct me if

Before I begin, big thanks to John Terpstra for helping me out with my previous issues. But alas I have another issue, I need to enforce strong passwords on windows side (i.e. ctrl+alt+delete change password), minimum password length, can't be dictionary words, etc. etc. (Setup is Samba 3.0.0 as PDC with LDAP passdb) >From what I undersatnd previously this could've been done using