similar to: Wine Feature suggestion (Windows Compatibility System)

"bit of trouble" - good pun! But I do hope it gets solved. Can you make a bash file (oh no - a pun of my own!) to automate any of those annoyances? Would putting the game "in its own WINE" help at all? Cheers, Jake On May 3, 2011, at 3:18 AM, wine-users-request at winehq.org wrote: > Send wine-users mailing list submissions to > wine-users at winehq.org > >

Doh123, how is running a program off an NTFS partition asking for trouble? Ntfsprogs seems to handle it just fine. I know that NTFS doesn't let you mark a file as executable, and that the filesystem is susceptible to fragmentation, but you should just be able to tell it to run rather than display and be good. It shouldn't cause destruction. I think there might even be an NTFS defrag tool

On 6/24/2017 11:35 AM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > Hello Douglas, > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Douglas E Engert <deengert at gmail.com <mailto:deengert at gmail.com>> wrote: > > OpenSC has taken a different approach to OpenSSL-1.1. Rather then writing > > a shim for OpenSSL-1.1, the OpenSC code has been converted to > > the OpenSSL-1.1 API and a

On 01/16/2018 02:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I had an idea about how we might do this and still keep a single > .pwrite method for plugins. Maybe it's too complicated but here goes: > > > This is binary-compatible with old plugins, but not source compatible, so: > > > (2) Plugsin may optionally define NBDKIT_PLUGIN_LEVEL before including >

TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/amd64/amd64/supfile TB --- 2008-08-27

Just to prove it, I replied to my own message...AND sent it to myself. What a day... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Wine] Errors running BiblePro and BibleStudyPro on today's Git Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:07:43 -0700 From: James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> To: James Mckenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> References:

On 6/13/21 3:36 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev wrote: > Haven't got many ideas on this today, preoccupied with other > house-work, but can share a couple :) > > Regarding two implementations - I believe NSS and OpenSSL are licensed > differently and/or are (initially were?) available non-overlapping on > different OSes. A quick googling now showed that they both were >

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016-11-02, Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> wrote: > > The current set of patches are rebased on current upstream is attached > > with few more tweaks needed to build, pass testsuite and make it work. > > The upstream review and insight would be helpful. > > Since these are going to break things with LibreSSL,

OpenSC has taken a different approach to OpenSSL-1.1. Rather then writing a shim for OpenSSL-1.1, the OpenSC code has been converted to the OpenSSL-1.1 API and a sc-ossl-compat.h" file consisting of defines and macros was written to support older versions of OpenSSL and Libressl. https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/blob/master/src/libopensc/sc-ossl-compat.h The nice part of this approach is

When writing the Internet-Draft (I-D) "UPS Management Protocol" [1], I was required by IETF rules to include a "Security Considerations" chapter. This meant saying clearly that the SSL provisions in NUT for secure communication are now outdated and deprecated. The IETF now insists on secure communication and this makes NUT's situation an issue for the project. In

At 06:10 AM 8/2/2020, you wrote: >On 8/2/20 8:04 AM, david wrote: > > > >> <snip> > > > > > > > >> > I'll post here again once we have pushed the EL8 and CentOS Stream > >> updates. > >> > >> OK .. I have also now pushed the CentOS Linux 8 update .. you should see > >> an update to SHIM .. the new

><snip> > > I'll post here again once we have pushed the EL8 and CentOS Stream updates. > >OK .. I have also now pushed the CentOS Linux 8 update .. you should see >an update to SHIM .. the new versions are: > >PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/shim-unsigned-x64-15-8.el8.x86_64.rpm >BaseOS/x86_64/os/Packages/shim-ia32-15-15.el8_2.x86_64.rpm

This is a quick recovery and fix for the machines rendered unbootable after the grub2/shim yum update. It is written for CentOS 8.2.2004 but similar should work for any CentOS 8 or 7 as long as you get the correct shim file, that is, the one from the latest installation media. I am running on an x86_64 architecture (see uname -i). Please use the correct shim file for your architecture

At 06:37 AM 8/2/2020, Johnny Hughes wrote: >On 8/2/20 8:30 AM, david wrote: > > At 06:10 AM 8/2/2020, you wrote: > >> On 8/2/20 8:04 AM, david wrote: > >> > > >> >> <snip> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > I'll post here again once we have pushed the EL8 and CentOS Stream > >>

Hello all-- These instructions are somewhat OK but my messed up box is the only one I've got basically to help with this problem. Where can we find "correction" instructions using a "rescue" CD or flash drive? I understand RedHat provided detailed instructions to supported customers. Thanks. _______________________ Sent from MzK's phone. ---------- Forwarded message

OK, so what is the answer to jsmith's question? On 6/22/08 wine-users-request at winehq.org wrote: > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:22:59 -0700 > From: James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 at sprintpcs.com> > Subject: Re: [Wine] Wine on Windows XP > To: Michael Reich <reich.mikey at gmail.com> > Cc: wine-users at winehq.org > Message-ID: <485EFAF3.8010907

On June 13, 2021 9:02:46 PM GMT+03:00, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: >Let's not overlook the simple fact that a lot of deployments are behind >secure firewalls, on secure networks, and on servers and lans that no >users have access to (physical ormotherwise), and thus have negligible >security requirements beyond what the environment already provides. >Yes,

I am using memdisk to remotely flash the BIOS and other firmware. It works well for most flash programs. After the flash I need to initialize the NIC to send a signal to my management server that the flash is complete. I am curious as to how others have solved this problem. Thanks.

Hi, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:43:41AM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > You've got this exactly backwards. We don't want a shim that allows > OpenSSL-1.1 to present a OpenSSL-1.0 API. We want a shim that allows > us to use the OpenSSL-1.1 API when using OpenSSL-1.0, so we don't have > to maintain a forest of #ifdefs. For obvious reasons this shim cannot exist. If the

Hi all, According to lld/docs/Driver.rst, Flavor command line option determines the style of lld command-line interface when invoked. However, it looks like this option also determines the set of supported targets we are linking for. For example, lld -flavor gnu cannot link mach-o binaries, and could not link PE binaries either (well, not until rL312926). Is this really intended by the design