similar to: Specify glibc version to run/compile wine against?

[root@1950 SRPMS]# rpmbuild -bp glibc-2.3.4-2.9xen2.src.rpm ... + mkdir -p /var/tmp/glibc-2.3.4-root/usr/lib/nptl + cp -a libc.a nptl/libpthread.a nptl/libpthread_nonshared.a rt/librt.a /var/tmp/glibc-2.3.4-root/usr/lib/nptl/ + sed ''s| /lib/| /lib/tls/|'' /var/tmp/glibc-2.3.4-root/usr/lib/libc.so sed: can''t read /var/tmp/glibc-2.3.4-root/usr/lib/libc.so: No such file or

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0125 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0125.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c40f7a3d1091ec0ce10233b49f58cfaf8a9a59380e44fe61303b3e22124a345c glibc-2.3.4-2.57.i386.rpm

Seeing upstream has an update for glibc http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0052.html I rebuilt the glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.src.rpm and it produced the following rpms :- glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-common-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-debuginfo-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-debuginfo-common-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm

Hello, I'm running Slackware 10.2 with kernel 2.4.31, and I'm trying to install Wine. I have glibc vers 2.3.5. Linux thread libraries are saved in the /lib directory, while NPTL libraries are saved in /lib/ tls. Other than the source I downloaded I have no other version of wine on my machine. I ran '.configure --with-nptl=/lib/tls' and everything seemed to compile properly,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:256 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-256.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/glibc-common-2.3.2-95.33.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/glibc-debug-2.3.2-95.33.s390.rpm

<resend with corrected subject> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:256 glibc security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-256.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.i686.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:256 glibc security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-256.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.i686.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/glibc-common-2.3.2-95.33.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:256 glibc security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-256.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.3.2-95.33.i386.rpm

<resend with corrected subject> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:256 glibc security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-256.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.i686.rpm

root at memorex:~# winecfg wine: glibc >= 2.3 without NPTL or TLS is not a supported combination. It will most likely crash. Please upgrade to a glibc with NPTL support. wine: creating configuration directory '/root/.wine'... wine: glibc >= 2.3 without NPTL or TLS is not a supported combination. It will most likely crash. Please upgrade to a glibc with NPTL support. wine:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-586.html refers Changed files : updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.30.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.30.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.3.2-95.30.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-devel-2.3.2-95.30.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-profile-2.3.2-95.30.i386.rpm

I'd like to modify pthread library ( e.g. manipulating some functions ) in glibc, so I want to compile and install modified glibc. However, I failed to compile glibc and need some help. How can I fix the problem? Here is the process that I've tried. 1. download glibc-2.3.4.tar.tar from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/ 2. unzip glibc-2.3.4.tar.tar 3. make build-folder [root at localhost /]#

From: alex at milivojevic.org > At various points in time Red Hat made some somewhat conflicting > decisions. The first was that Red Hat distributions must have NPTL. > For NPTL support, there are two components of system where it is > implemented, kernel and glibc. Back then glibc supported NPTL only > for i686. NPTL support was later backported to i586 and i486. Also remember

On a centos 4.6 box rpm -qa | grep glib glib-1.2.10-15 glibc-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39 dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9 glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39 glib2-2.4.7-1 I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 *** While I am researching this more, I am wondering if the

Further to the email below from a few weeks ago, I can announce that Xen/Linux 2.6 handles the TLS problem (-ve accesses into segments) by dynamically rewriting the offending instructions. This is enabled by default in the 2.6 kernels, and reduces the overhead of handling those instructions to almost zero (compared with around 100% overhead when using pure emulation in Xen, when running

New glibc packages are available for CentOS-3 x86_64. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-586.html. RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.30.i686.rpm RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.30.x86_64.rpm RPMS/glibc-common-2.3.2-95.30.x86_64.rpm RPMS/glibc-devel-2.3.2-95.30.i386.rpm RPMS/glibc-devel-2.3.2-95.30.x86_64.rpm RPMS/glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30.x86_64.rpm RPMS/glibc-profile-2.3.2-95.30.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:256 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-256.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/glibc-2.3.2-95.33.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/glibc-common-2.3.2-95.33.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/glibc-debug-2.3.2-95.33.ia64.rpm

Full_Name: Luca Barbato Version: 2.3.1 OS: Gentoo Linux/PPC Submission from: (NULL) (151.44.163.144) system informations Portage 2.1 (default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2006.0/G4, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.17-rc5 ppc) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.17-rc5 ppc 7447A, altivec supported Gentoo Base System version 1.12.1 distcc 2.18.3

I'm building an RPM of a DNS server called NSD on CentOS 4.4. I'm going to be using it for some heavy-duty DNS traffic, so I want to minimise its dependencies on external libraries. I have therefore attempted to link it statically. The package does build, and even runs fine. However, during the build process, gcc emits warnings like these: nsd.o(.text+0xfba): In function `main':