similar to: dogfood advanced ip scanner

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "dogfood advanced ip scanner"

2008 Jul 16
0
[dogfood] Jedit totally irresponsive upon launch
Windows (stable) version tested in Wine. Needs Java 1.5 minimum. Available at www.jedit.org, source code available. Installation without an hitch. After installation, it asks you wether you want to start it. If you tick on yes, it is immediately prompted. Afterwards, your screen becomes black with only the main block (middle) to be seen. No possibility to close it and the rest is black. You can
2017 Mar 20
2
Please dogfood LLD
Michael Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hi Rui, > > Are there any plans to support the -defsym command line option? It doesn't look that hard, it was just never requested. What project is using it? Cheers, Rafael
2017 Mar 15
2
Please dogfood LLD
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Mark Kettenis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Or perhaps we can cheat and include "GNU" somewhere in the > lld -v output ;). Let's please not do this. It would give the wrong signal. If libtool won't acknowledge lld's existence, then there are better ways like a rewrite and (temp) downstream patch.
2008 May 27
4
Dogfood Challenge
SmartFTP installs but fails to start with: "Fatal Error: sfFTPLib.dll is not registered correctly" http://www.smartftp.com/download/ System: Fedora 9 Wine: 1.0 rc2
2017 Mar 14
2
Please dogfood LLD
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis at xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:39:22 -0700 > > From: Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > > > Hi all, > > > > LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for production > > use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and
2017 Mar 15
4
Please dogfood LLD
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote: > Note that even if/when we get changes incorporated into libtool it > will still take a long time for the change to appear in new releases > of software packages using libtool. A downstream patch to the libtool > package in various operating systems or distributions doesn't really > help that much
2017 Mar 20
3
Please dogfood LLD
Michael Johnson <mpj at rowley.co.uk> writes: > Hi Rafael, >> Michael Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> >>> Hi Rui, >>> >>> Are there any plans to support the -defsym command line option? >> It doesn't look that hard, it was just never requested. What project is >> using it? > Not sure I understand
2017 Mar 16
5
Please dogfood LLD
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:55 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 14 Mar 2017, at 18:39, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: > > > > LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for > production use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and MIPS). > > We’re now using it with
2017 Mar 16
2
Please dogfood LLD
I personally haven't tried gdb_index, and I don't know the quality of the produced index. Most of the code was written by George. One thing I noticed about the feature (and filed as http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32228) is that our gdb_index feature is much slower than the gold. Apparently there's room for improvement. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:35 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie
2017 Mar 16
2
Please dogfood LLD
What program did you use to test the feature, and what was missing information? I'd like to file that as a bug so that we can fix this later. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:34 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW - selfhosting I did find that GDB wasn't able to find the source code > for some functions when using LLD's gdb_index, so I've switched back to
2017 Mar 14
10
Please dogfood LLD
Hi all, LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for production use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and MIPS). I believe you've heard a few good news about the linker -- it just works <http://lld.llvm.org/#features> and is very fast <http://lld.llvm.org/#performance>, clean, compact and supported by the active community. I don't think I need to
2005 Nov 27
1
Question about wine 0.9.2 and VideoLan Media Client
Hi! I just installed wine 0.9.2 on my Linux system and tried installing VLC 0.8.4 for Windows: http://www.videolan.org/ The installer ran fine and VLC even started! I was able to open a WMV file but when it started playing back, it crashed: ----------------START---------------------- tom@linux:~$ wine vlc-0.8.4-win32.exe fixme:win:SetWindowTextA setting text "VideoLAN VLC media
2017 Mar 19
8
Please dogfood LLD
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Ed Maste via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 15 March 2017 at 16:34, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > If FreeBSD's libtool is patched to be aware of the base ld=lld, > > would this still be true? > > Yes, for the same reason Joerg points out in another reply in this
2007 May 23
1
VB6 app under WINE 0.9.37
Hi, Having installed the following winetricks : vcrun6 dcom98 mdac28 jet40 cc580 native_mdac (not sure if this is needed if mdac28+jet40 already installed) I managed to start a VB6 application and try to work with it quite similar to native Windows. However, sometimes there happen problems which cause to restart the whole application. This app often hides its main menu on opening
2011 May 20
6
ProgeCAD windows C++ Library run time error
Hi, I'm new to Linux and even newer to wine. I'm using the latest release of wine 1.3.20 on U10.10 - the Maverick Meerkat. I work as an AutoCAD Draft Person and as much as I have fallen in love with my Ubuntu OS I am really disappointed with the lack of quality CAD software. I came across ProgeCAD (2010 Pro) on a couple of forums and saw in the AppDB section that ProgeCAD has some
2011 Jun 28
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r3060 - branches/nut-scanner/tools/nut-scanner
2011/6/27 Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org> > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Mon Jun 27 13:56:51 2011 > New Revision: 3060 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3060 > > Log: > Add NUT server scan. > > (...) > device_t * scan_snmp(char * start_ip, char * stop_ip,long usec_timeout, > snmp_security_t * sec); > >
2011 Jun 21
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r3048 - branches/nut-scanner/tools/nut-scanner
Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Modified: branches/nut-scanner/tools/nut-scanner/scan_snmp.c > ============================================================================== > --- branches/nut-scanner/tools/nut-scanner/scan_snmp.c Fri Jun 17 > 08:12:00 2011 (r3047) > +++ branches/nut-scanner/tools/nut-scanner/scan_snmp.c Tue Jun 21 >
2011 Apr 19
1
DNS-SD (was Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r2974 - branches/nut-scanner/tools/nut-scanner)
On Apr 19, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Tue Apr 19 11:43:46 2011 > New Revision: 2974 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2974 > ... > +void scan_nut_avahi() > +{ > + printf("Scanning NUT bus (DNS-SD method):\n"); > + > + /* Check avahi-browse code: > + *
2006 Mar 14
1
html-scanner in controller?
Rails'' docs state for strip_tags: "Strips all HTML tags from the input, including comments. This uses the html-scanner tokenizer and so it?s HTML parsing ability is limited by that of html-scanner.Returns the tag free text." What''s "html-scanner" (some brief Googling didn''t find anything definitive) and can I use it in a controller? Joe --
2003 Sep 09
1
WEB SCANNER
I was wondering what was a good web scanner to scan IIS servers. I played with nikto, but i'm not sure if it does IIS or not. It seems to only look for CGI stuff. Thanks.