similar to: Deallocation of a locked memory block

When updating the speex sources from svn tree, I found that the following revision has corrupted the deallocation (segmentation fault): ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r9320 | jm | 2005-05-27 15:05:05 -0300 (Fri, 27 May 2005) | 2 lines Proper de-allocation When compiling with the 9316, everything works fine. but when I update with later

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:34PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > Up until now, freeing payloads on remote MST hubs that just had ports > removed has almost never worked because we've been relying on port > validation in order to stop us from accessing ports that have already > been freed from memory, but ports which need their payloads released due > to being removed will never be

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6636 Summary: Deallocation of a pointer not malloced Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: PPC OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: aaro at iki.fi

Hi, So 9316 works and 9320 doesn't? How about latest SVN. I just ran everything in valgrind and saw no error at all. Can you give more info on how to reproduce (with speexenc)? Jean-Marc Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 ? 21:19 -0300, Dario Andrade a ?crit : > > > When updating the speex sources from svn tree, I found that the > following revision has corrupted the deallocation

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > I've been reading the headers and > http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/docs/ProgrammersManual.html and I'm still > confused about a pretty fundamental point... who is expected to clean up > various objects when we're finished with them, and when? Ok, different objects have different life times. The important ones are: (most)

On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 18:56 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > Other IR objects (like instructions) have very simple ownership. An > instruction is owned by its basic block, a bb is owned by the function, a > function is owned by thet module. If an instruction is initially allocated with its Instruction *insertAtEnd parameter defaulted to null, and then later appended to a BasicBlock,

Hello mailing list. I'm writing to discuss issue which was already discussed here - https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 - OS doesn't shrink memory of the process. Thanks to Simon Urbanek for digging and explanation. However it was quite hard to find this topic after I've discovered same problem on my Ubuntu machine (and I scratched my head because there were no

Dear all, I have wrapped a C++ function in an R package. I allocate/deallocate memory using C++ 'new' and 'delete'. In order to allow user interrupts without memory leaks I've moved all the delete statements required after an interrupt to a separate C++ function freeMemory(), which is called using on.exit() just before the .C() call. I am concerned about the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've been reading the headers and http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/docs/ProgrammersManual.html and I'm still confused about a pretty fundamental point... who is expected to clean up various objects when we're finished with them, and when? Let's say I've created a module, retrieved a bunch of types, created a function, a basic block,

Up until now, freeing payloads on remote MST hubs that just had ports removed has almost never worked because we've been relying on port validation in order to stop us from accessing ports that have already been freed from memory, but ports which need their payloads released due to being removed will never be a valid part of the topology after they've been removed. Since we've

Up until now, freeing payloads on remote MST hubs that just had ports removed has almost never worked because we've been relying on port validation in order to stop us from accessing ports that have already been freed from memory, but ports which need their payloads released due to being removed will never be a valid part of the topology after they've been removed. Since we've

hello i've got a problem with the "message command "option here is my config in smb.conf message command = /usr/local/samba/var/popup/get_popup "%f" "%t" "%s" "%I" & and the get_popup script date=`date +%d-%m-%Y` heure=`date +%H:%M` machine=$1 destinataire=$2 message=`cat $3` ip=$4 infos=`/usr/local/samba/bin/nmblookup -A $ip | grep

Hi All, Can anyone explain why the MachineRelocation field "NeedsStub" is set to true for GlobalValues on x86_64, but false on plain x86? This is causing the JITEmitter to allocate a stub for every GlobalValue relocation it encounters on x86_64, quickly exhausting the 512K region for stubs in the default JIT memory manager. Is this expected behavior? Is there anyway to override the stub

Hi, Does anybody have a little cross-browser piece of code to resize a popup ? Excatly, I don''t know if it is possible ?, I would like to open a popup on the side of an existing window like if it would be a tabpane. So reducing window width by the width of the popup, set the popup on the side of the window. And the best of the best: when the window is resize, resizing the popup also

Hi everyone - I have a nicely working system to which I'd like to add popups for incoming calls. Calls go into a queue, then all extensions ring. I'd like the agent that answers to call to get the popup on screen. I'm currently using Flash Operator Panel to get a popup (other suggestions welcome). Currently, all users get a popup when the call first goes into the queue

Hello, I''m trying to use the rail link_to to open a popup window and then print the popup window at the same time. Is there a way to add another "onclick" option to tell the popup to print? I know how to do this in javascript but not sure how to use the rails help to do it. I also am aware that the link_to_function method is used to call a javascript function.

Hi, Teresa, This looks really useful. It seems like this general infrastructure could be useful for diagnosing places where we have a lot of false sharing too. This could be between cores, sockets, or devices. Looking forward, especially with HMM and support under Linux for transparent unified memory between CPUs and accelerators, I anticipate we'll end up looking for places where some

Dear All I want to integrate sugarcrm and asterisk , so when customer call the call center the agent or extension which answers the call , before pickup the phone and talk to customer , view his/her information if it is available. I do this as described below : 1-Setup login username for sugarcrm for each extension 2-Extension Users will login to the sugarcrm. 3-Develop php script to handle new

Thank you John and John :P these optimizations (mem2reg and the "few additional" ones) I have to enable then or something like this?? (I compile the .ll to .o with the sequence llvm-as, llc, as) Yet about dynamic stack allocation, what is (generally) better? to pre alloc everything at start, or let it be? Imagine this pseudo-code while (x) { int b = 0; ... } using alloca where b

Hello all, I''ve run into trouble attempting to replicate something in ajax that worked when done with an iframe... In both cases I have a table inside a div that is being periodically refreshed every few seconds... The 1st column of each row in the table contains a link to a DHTML popup menu. I have the popup menu working in the ajax version. The problem is that in the ajax version