similar to: Is wine *always* mapping threads onto processes? (Was: Re: multiple inst

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:43:12AM +0200, Fredrik Persson wrote: > > > it's probably a unique instance of the app with 5 threads in it. > > > each windows thread matches a unix-like process. > > > > Is that the general way wine translates windows threads, mapping them > > onto processes? Would that really be a good idea? Usually the argument > > goes

Well then, there you go. I really hope that I remembered to apply <stddisclaimer.h> to what I said. /Fredrik > > From: Kevin DeKorte <kdekorte@yahoo.com> > Date: 2002/09/11 Wed PM 04:14:27 CEST > To: Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de>, wine-users@winehq.com > Subject: Re: Is wine *always* mapping threads onto processes? (Was: Re: multiple instances . . . )

> How do I connect to the wine newsgroup?? > comp.emulators.ms-windows.wine /.../ > What is the server? You've got it wrong, those are not servers, those are newsgroups. You need to go to Google (for example) and search for something like "free news server". /Fredrik Persson

Hello! I am new to this list (although I have done a fair amount of research in the archives) and I need to ask what is probably one of the most frequently asked questions on a list like this: How do I install Word97 and Excel97? (Codeweavers CrossoverOffice can do this, and they ASSURE us that they roll everything they do back to the main wine CVS and hence, this SHOULD work!) So far; this is

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:54:41AM +1100, Matthew Geier wrote: > Frank Joerdens wrote: > > > > Greetings. I read in a samba list that the quota support is 'broken' in > > so-called 'linus' kernels > 2.4.3 and that one is supposed to use a > > redhat or 'cox' kernel (what the hell is that supposed to mean . . . are > > we having different

I am fairly new to linux and wine as well. I was wanting to install another version of wine but i need to uninstall the first one i got. I know how to do this if it were an RPM but its not it was a tgz file that i had to build and install myself how would I uninstall this. Thanks Kristopher Powell

Hi again! Yesterday I wrote to this list complaining that I could not install Excel 97. I have now succeeded. The trick was NOT to run "install.exe", but to unpack xl97_1.cab and run the acmsetup.exe in there, like so: "wine -- acmsetup.exe /T excel97.stf" (I think that excel97.stf existed in the first cab-file as well.) The installer will ask for a few files that all can

Hi, in Section 'Writing package vignettes' of 'Writing R Extensions' it says: "Whenever a Makefile is found, then R CMD build will try to run make after the Sweave runs, so PDF manuals can be created from arbitrary source formats (plain LaTeX files, ...). [...] Note that the make step is executed even if there are no files in Sweave format, [...]". In my package,

Hi, We're running 3.0.31 (yes, I know that's old!) on a dual core processor, our kernel has SMB support and the dual core processor is recognized correctly, yet all (300+) smbd process seem to be hitting the same core! Is this our OS, the version of samba, something else? Any pointers would be much appreciated! Thanks, Steve -- Steve Rippl Technology Director Woodland Public Schools

I'm a brand new wine user, trying to install a genealogy program that the database says works without problems. I get a load of error messages when I run the install, and the install never completely runs. I want help, but I don't know where to start. What information should I be providing to the good folks of this list in hopes of getting a solution? Thanks Rick Seiden

I installed WPO2000 on RedHat 7.2 - it worked fine for a while. I used the updated install scripts and Mr. Torrie's CorelWine rpm. It has been working fine for a couple of weeks (and continues to do so on another machine). Now when I start the WP application, I get a window that says "Wine initializing...", then it goes away (a little too quickly, I think), and then...

In Section 'Package subdirectories' of 'Writing R Extensions', it says about the inst/ directory that: "The contents of the inst subdirectory will be copied recursively to the installation directory (except perhaps hidden files with names starting with ?.?)." Indeed, on Windows with R v2.12.0 patched (2010-11-01 r53513) and R v2.13.0 devel (2010-11-01 r53513), if you

I wouldn't think it's possible but I'd like to know (with an explanation, if possible): Can you run win32 apps with wine on non-x86 computers, e.g. under LinuxPPC? I guess not, but I wouldn't be able to give a clear explanation as to why. Regards, Frank

Packages have been uploaded to the main samba server and should be available on all mirrors shortly. -- ====================================================================== Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics Networking Engineer 2011 N Shoreline Blvd Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA 94043 herb@sgi.com

Hi, LLVM optimizer seems to leave "call exit" instruction in "main" function but it could be replaced by a return instruction. Any reason why leave it as is or this simple optimization could be implemented e.g. in SimplifyLibCalls? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello all, >From what I have observed, using `Inst->replaceAllUsesWith` does not replace uses of the `Inst` in `ConstantExpr`s. Is there some way to have a universal replaceAllUsesWith? Thanks, ~Siddharth. -- Sending this from my phone, please excuse any typos! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi *, to decide in which namespace tablegen should place the instruction-enum, tablegen iterates over CodeGenTarget instructions until it finds an Instruction with a namespace other than "TargetInstInfo".. but this is wrong, as internal Instructions now use "TargetOpcode" as Namespace.. As Instructions are a map, it is only by chance which is the first instruction it finds -

On 8 March 2010 19:51, Arushi Aggarwal <arushi987 at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2. I notice that the setAlignment method for an AllocaInst takes an > unsigned. For 64 bit systems, alignment could potentially be larger. Is > there a reason why the alignment should be restricted to this size? > Thanks in advance > Would it ever be practical to align a stack variable to an 8 GiB

Hello I think I found a bug in the x86 instruction definition file, while trying out the disassembler. It looks like the "ADD32rr_alt" instruction should have GR32 operands, not GR16. Attached you can find a patch, which should fix the problem. But even with the change I can not decode e.g. "0x03 0xC1" (should be "addl %ecx, %eax") only if I remove the

Hello LLVMer's I am now trying to fix a bug PR9473. sitofp instruction in LLVM IR is converted to vcvtsi2sd(also applied to vcvtsi2ss case) for x86/AVX backend, but vcvtsi2sd is somewhat odd instruction format. VCVTSI2SD xmm1, xmm2, r/m32 VCVTSI2SD xmm1, xmm2, r/m64 bits(127:64) of xmm2 is copied to corresponding bits of xmm1, thus in many case xmm1 and xmm2 could be same register.