similar to: Has anyone complied Wine onto a Sparc (Suse 7.1.)?

I''m an independent software developer that spends a fair amount of time each day working on Rails-related project. t''d be really great to meet some people to chat about rails, software development, or whatever else geeky stuff via IM! If interested, shoot me an e-mail or reply here. Personally, I''m a little apprehensive about putting all my info out there on a list

Hello, when I try to install Xen-Tools using the xs-tools.iso I get the error: Errors were encountered while processing: /mnt/visostore/Linux/xe-guest utilities_0.5.0-579_i386.deb I used the xs-tools. iso present in the installation CD XCP and I followed the steps on page 28 (To install the guest agent) of XCP Virtual Machine Installation Guide: I mounted the xs-tools. iso and I executed the

I installed oh323 and everything seemed to go smoothly (compile & everything upto calling through using oh323). I must admit, there is some behavior that's doesn't seem right but generally, I'm able to dial-out of any oh323 device whether to an extension or to a trunk. Audio is sometimes muted when dialing out until the extension or dialed number answers. Sound quality is good

My project is currently using AAF 0.4.3. Trunk has some compelling features, but my project is going live on Monday and I am apprehensive about switching. Is anyone using trunk in a relatively high-volume context? (A low and vague standard for evaluating production suitability, I know, but better than nothing). Thanks, John

Hi folks, Yet another upgrade question! Reading the mailing list regarding upgrades in the past few months has made me a little apprehensive. After now running a single Samba DC for a few months and excising the last remnants of the old Windows DC, I would like to join another Samba DC to the existing one. Current one (DC2) is running Samba 4.5 on Debian Stretch. samba-tool dbcheck looks clean

Matt: that’s fair. We’re generally apprehensive of option 2 as well. Eli: Yes, currently we believe that aarch64.neon.addp is the only arm64 one affected, but we don’t know how prevalent this is on other targets. Splitting it is certainly possible combined with the autoupgrader. If disambiguating the intrinsics is the preferred solution, then I think we should also have the langref also specify

Hi Sanjoy, >> I'm a bit apprehensive of adding more caching to solve problems created by caching; but if there is no way out of adding another cache, how about adding a cache that maps SCEV expressions to their simplified versions? Then we could do something like: I may be wrong but I think caching is not an issue in itself, but caching in the presence of self-recursion is. >>

I've seen the question asked a few times already, along the lines of "Who's really using Asterisk out there, and what for?" or "Would Asterisk be right for me?" etc. I've been thinking about it more lately as I may have the opporunity to consult and/or install a system in the near future. I'm a bit apprehensive, as installing a system with a T1 PRI and a couple

Hi Pankaj, On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com> wrote: > Thanks for investigating the issue! > > I am more interested in getting the underlying problem fixed rather than making this particular test case work. I think I have more test cases where this problem crops up. I would any day prefer consistent results over compile time savings which

This sounds fine to me (and sorry for the delay!). -- Sanjoy On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Sanjoy, > > So what is the verdict on this issue? > > Thanks, > Pankaj > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chawla, Pankaj > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 11:12 AM > To: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at

Hi Sanjoy, So what is the verdict on this issue? Thanks, Pankaj -----Original Message----- From: Chawla, Pankaj Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 11:12 AM To: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> Cc: Maxim Kazantsev <max.kazantsev at azul.com>; Serguei Katkov <serguei.katkov at azul.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: RE: [SCEV] Inconsistent SCEV formation for

Hi Sanjoy, Thanks for the reply! Would it be possible for you to implement this? You know the codebase better than I do. Thanks, Pankaj -----Original Message----- From: Sanjoy Das [mailto:sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 1:34 PM To: Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com> Cc: Maxim Kazantsev <max.kazantsev at azul.com>; Serguei Katkov

Hi Pankaj, On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply! > Would it be possible for you to implement this? I don't have cycles for this right now, but if you file a bug I can give this a shot when I have time later. Even in the best case this will have to at least wait until end of April because I'm leaving for a

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:40:51 +0100, Simon Hobson wrote: > The think here is that you are into "backup" tools rather than the > general purpose tool that rsync is intended to be. Yes, that is true. Rsync serves so well as a core component to backup, I can be blind about "something other than rsync". I'll look at the tools you suggest. However, you've made be

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Sean Silva wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > How many customers out there are shipping their LLVM-based products > > > > without actually including

Hi, I posted the following message to the RedHat linux list to see if anyone had any thoughts about this problem. I have only received a few replies, all of which state that they have experinced poor performance problems with ssh on Solaris. They do not, however, state if it is openssh, which version, what hardware, or what version of Solaris. (All I can say is that we have had no problems with

When I use my phone to make VOIP call and another calls comes from POTS my phone rings to POTS caller. Why? Shouldn't it generate busy signal! -- #Joseph

Hello, The package cts on CRAN generated a note on some systems. For instance: checking compiled code ... NOTE File ?/home/ripley/R/Lib32/cts/libs/cts.so?: Found ?abort?, possibly from ?abort? (C) which can be found from the link http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-patched-solaris-sparc/cts-00check.html But the package uses Fortran subroutines only without any C subroutines. In

I have some redhat 7.3 boxes running as router/server and can't upgrade them.(too many setup things to do). Is there anyway to modify tinc 1.0.9 to complie with openssl 0.9.6b? Or someone can tell me how to staticly complie tinc with openssl? thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

So I just spent a frustrating day trying to get smbclient from 4.2.x and master connecting to a NetApp 8.2 box using SMB2 or SMB3 with NTLM auth. Short answer - it doesn't work :-(. Longer answer - the NetApp is choking on something inside the SPNEGO NTLMSSP packets we're sending it - giving the error that it couldn't parse the SPNEGO packet. Unfortunately (and knowing bugger-all