similar to: newbie questions

Hi. On my new job we use VMware ESXi (Free version), but my colleagues use Windows on their PC's. I am allowed to use CentOS Linux, but I have no prior experience with WMVare. I now (today) have to install CentOS 6.x minimal on that ESXi server, so I am trying to wrap my head around whole ecosystem. What should I install on my CentOS 6.x so I can access/manage ESXi server and manage

With WinXP host, RH8 VMware guest, at level 3, I issue: mount -t smbfs -o user,noauto,dmask=777,fmask=777,username=xx, password=yy //DELLBOX/linuxShare /mnt/linuxShare and get: Connection to DELLBOX failed SMB connection failed timeout connecting to 192.168.113.1:139 Error connecting to 192.168.113.1 I cannot find this IP address anywhere. My tables indicate that port 139 is

Hi, Im getting daily segfaults when running 40-100 cuncurrent calls in G729 passthrough mode. Any thoughs on why this is happening is most appreciated. #0 0x0000003cd773356f in __strlen_sse42 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x000000000043b352 in update_bridgepeer (c0=0x7faeac06a320, c1=0x7faea4711570) at channel.c:4791 #2 0x0000000000445f42 in ast_channel_bridge (c0=0x7faeac06a320,

Notice of a major upcoming API change: The static methods for constructing types and constants will be going away in the future. Instead, the global uniquing tables that lurk behind these APIs will be privatized within LLVMContext instances. What this means for you: Your client application will need to create an LLVMContext in main(), and pass it into a few APIs (the constructor for

I usually lurk on the asterisk devel list to see what's going on. No posts for a week or two. Has the list moved ? sean

In checking over the solutions to some homework that I had assigned I observed the fact that in R (version 2.4.0) pnorm(-1.46) gives 0.07214504. The tables in the text book that I am using for the course give the probability as 0.0722. Fascinated, I scanned through 5 or 6 other text books (amongst the dozens of freebies from publishers that lurk on my shelf) and found that some agree with R

Hi, In support of reproducible research at my Institute, I seek an approach to re-creating the R environments in which an analysis has been conducted. By which I mean, the exact version of R and the exact version of all packages used in a particular R session. I am seeking comments/criticism of this as a goal, and of the following outline of an approach: === When all the steps to an workflow

Hi Everyone, Just trying my luck here but are there others in the list lurking that down under in Sydney? I'm happy to make something happen if there's at least *one* other person in Sydney. :) Cheers -- Dean

On Thu, 26 Mar, 2020 at 18:39:56 -0600, R C wrote: > well,? sorry,? I thought it was somewhat "self-explaining", since that > terminology was used up until Centos 7 (see > > links), andof course I meant the official download page. > > > minimal: as in approx 3Gb or so that fits on a regular 4-5Gb rewritable DVD > as with Centos 7 > > download from :

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 2:49 PM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, > and often intimidating for newcomers > > > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use > multiple avenues of communication, it’s **really** hard to imagine email > as a

I lurk and comment a little on here and have been playing with * for a short while. I am interested in hearing about the pros and cons for using a database backend to Asterisk. My current setup is simple, out of the box with config files in /etc/asterisk and logs etc going into /var. I notice a great many of the contributors here seem to use a db backend (is this also called Real Time

Is there anyone on this list that can give an overview of what is happening with the printer driver in WINE ? As of version 9.24 I had functional printing with CUPS but in 9.25 and 9.26 I don't. I'm just wondering if I am not aware of some new steps that I need to do with each new release/compile cycle here. I'm using 2.6.18 kernel and compiling from source.

Actually, Sorry guys, I just want to say the below paragraph is misrepresenting. You can stream music without "paying the piper" without being in copyright hell. And as a long time icecast user/admin/client/server/whatever, that below paragraph just makes me really sad to see on this list. ...I'll lurk now. --Stauf > When people run icecast without registering their server and

On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev .... > I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the > design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems. Design goals ? Compatibility with and/or minimum disruption to existing systems ? It was arrogant change with absolutely no regard for the existing Centos/RHEL

Hello All, I'd like to lurk for a while.. is there a searchable archive? Thanks, Glenn -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.2/1184 - Release Date: 12/14/2007 11:29 AM

To ease this transition, I have added a getGlobalContext() API. If you're only ever planning to use LLVM on a single thread, it will be completely safe to simply pass this value to every API that takes an LLVMContext. --Owen On Jun 30, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Notice of a major upcoming API change: The static methods for > constructing types and constants will

Hi - We have dovecot version : 0.99.11 release : 2.EL4.1 on Centos 4.2, with an LDAP backend (Samba PDC) and pam set to authenticate against LDAP. Dovecot is set to use pam for authentication. It uses mbox, and the machine has very little load (95% idle, no memory pressure). Every 36 hours or so, no users are able to login to imap (we have only imap enabled). Other services that use the same

> > On 4 Aug 2016, at 14:20, Ben Lippmeier <benl at ouroborus.net> wrote: > > >> On 3 Aug 2016, at 12:38 PM, Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Just trying my luck here but are there others in the list lurking that down under in Sydney? I'm happy to make something happen if

On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:27 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > .......... I feel like > there is brave new world of admins who feel it right to have > "iPad-like" everything, i.e. boxes cooked up and sealed by vendor, and > you have no way even to look inside, not to say re-shape interior to > your understanding [of security or anything else]. Am I the only one? Foolish

Hello Just a little reminder that the FreeBSD Security list only has the address freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, and not security@FreeBSD.org. The address security@FreeBSD.org is for the FreeBSD Security Team. If anyone is interested in the reason for this, see this thread from last year: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040407154220.GA5651 . -- Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Security Team