similar to: Why I can't ICMP ping under wine?

Thanks all, that seemed to be the problem (the suid bit). :) On 25 February 2016 at 06:03, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > On Wed, February 24, 2016 12:25 pm, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > Am 24.02.2016 um 16:07 schrieb Sylvain CANOINE: > >> Hello, > >> ----- Mail original ----- > >>> De: "John Cenile" <jcenile1983 at

Am 24.02.2016 um 16:07 schrieb Sylvain CANOINE: > Hello, > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "John Cenile" <jcenile1983 at gmail.com> >> ?: "centos" <centos at centos.org> >> Envoy?: Mercredi 24 F?vrier 2016 15:42:36 >> Objet: [CentOS] IPtables block user from outbound ICMP > >> Is it possible at all to block all users

On Wed, February 24, 2016 12:25 pm, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 24.02.2016 um 16:07 schrieb Sylvain CANOINE: >> Hello, >> ----- Mail original ----- >>> De: "John Cenile" <jcenile1983 at gmail.com> >>> ??: "centos" <centos at centos.org> >>> Envoy??: Mercredi 24 F??vrier 2016 15:42:36 >>> Objet: [CentOS] IPtables

On Wed, February 15, 2017 12:23 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/15/2017 08:47 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> And yes, ALL user writable places (including often overlooked /dev/shm) >> are mounted with nosuid, nosgid, nodev, noexec options on servers where >> users are allowed to have shell. > > > How sure are you? I just run a bunch of find commands before rolling

On Fri, January 23, 2015 5:37 am, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, January 22, 2015 9:05 pm, Always Learning wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: >> > >> >> I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop >> to

On Fri, January 23, 2015 2:05 pm, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > wrote: > >> As a matter of fact I tend to not use GUI admin tools since long ago. > > Bring back Xconfigurator! > >> I do prefer 3ware web RAID admin >> interface anything else (it more transparently prevents me from making

Hello, Is it possible at all to block all users other than root from sending outbound ICMP packets on an interface? At the moment we have the following two rules in our IPtables config: iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -m owner --uid-owner 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -j DROP But this still allows ICMP for some reason (but *does* block other TCP/UDP packets, which is what we want, as well

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

On Wed, February 4, 2015 10:18 am, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-02-04, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> One might question why *nix distributions insist on providing a known point of attack to begin with. Why does user 0 have to be called root? Why not beatlebailey, cinnamon or pasdecharge? > > That is more or less what OS X does. User 0 still exists,

Hi all I''m trying to install drivers GPLPV. The installation process stops and does nothing. (Here is a screenshot http://www.picshare.ru/view/171508/). I tried to install versions 0.11.0.308 and 0.11.0.357. For 32-bit and 64-bit systems Windows XP, Windovs Vista and Windows 7. Everywhere the same effect. Can anybody help me? -- Best regards Valery V.Smirnov

These type of constructs are less than ideal if you have something that uses LLVM as a library in a "long running" application (e.g. imagine something like photo editor that compiles "filters", and a user that loads the application on monday, and closes it on the following thursday) , as there is no (trivial) way to know that this stringmap exists, or that it may need cleaning

On Thu, January 22, 2015 9:05 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > >> I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to >> be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. >> >> Anybody else seeing it? >> >> In case attachments aren't allowed in the list, here's the Dropbox

a static local still produces a static dtor, though One of the ways you can get around this is with a deliberate non-cleanup: const foo &getFoo() { static const foo &f = *new foo(); return f; } that way no global dtor runs. Obviously only works if you don't need foo's dtor to run. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Craig Topper via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Hi all, I think there is still too few docs/samples for those, who'd like to write JIT-based interpreters. Today, the real examples to learn from are rather: - lli.cpp - ModuleMaker.cpp - Stacker which is still unfortunatelly not that much about JITing :( Well, what I am going to sell: What about very small JIT-based example similar to ModuleMaker? I mean example, where, say, two

This was the default version I got from public cvs last week. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:44:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > > (even on exotic

Hi devels, i did not find at this page: http://developer.r-project.org/ideas.txt any ideas concerning incorporating documentation possibilities (say, Sweave-based) into R-scripts. Was it discussed already? (If discussed, then what is the decision/conclusion then?) thanks, Valery

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible > optimizations are really invoked. > > Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 > on my Athlon XP 1500. Cool! Hey Valery, before we add this to the CVS repo, can you take a look at some of the changes I made to your HowToUseJIT example and

Building PowerPC.td register information header with tblgen Included from PowerPC.td:22: Parsing PowerPCInstrInfo.td:53: Variable not defined: 'GPRC'! make[3]: *** [PowerPCGenRegisterInfo.h.inc] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/ssrc/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC' maybe I just have to "make clean" and/or ./configure BTW, would it be nice to put Depend, Release and

Hi all, web-browser access to cvs is of course nice, but is it possible to provide anonymous read-only access to llvm cvs? (it would be nice to have an ability just download last sources) P.S. BTW, this and previous my post were actually motivated by desire to find some simple example on JIT usage :) --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi, are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) language implementations? How good is LLVM for this? E.g., is it natural to expect that the LLVM-based implementation of the language Concurrent Clean be any faster than its reference implementation? Best regards -- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: