similar to: CentOS 6.0 CR mdadm-3.2.2 breaks Intel BIOS RAID

I have a dell precision 380: http://catalog.us.dell.com/CS1/CS1Page2.aspx?br=6&c=us&cs=555&fm=11210&l=en&s=biz with an Intel Matrix Storage Manager ICH7R RAID Controller http://www.intel.com/support/chipsets/imsm/sb/cs-020663.htm I need to get CentOS 3 installed on this thing but can't due to the fact that the controller is not supported in 2.4 kernels. There is a patch

I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are my options? Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). mdadm.conf: # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid10] md127 : active raid10 sdf1[2](F)

Hi all, I have an odd interaction on a CentOS 7 file server. The basic setup is a minimal 7.x install. I have 4 internal drives (/dev/sd[a-d]) configured in a RAID5 and mounted locally on /data. This is exported via NFS to ~12 workstations which use the exported file systems for /home. I have an external drive connected via USB (/dev/sde) and mounted on /rsnapshot. I use rsnapshot to back up

> I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are > my > options? > > Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). > > mdadm.conf: > > # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda > MAILADDR root > AUTO +imsm +1.x -all > ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 > UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 > >

Hello folks, I am experiencing a weird problem at bootup with large RAID-6 arrays. After Googling around (a lot) I find that others are having the same issues with CentOS/RHEL/Ubuntu/whatever. In my case it's Scientific Linux-6 which should behave the same way as CentOS-6. I had the same problem with the RHEL-6 evaluation version. I'm posting this question to the SL mailing list

Hi list, I'm new with UEFI and GPT. For several years I've used MBR partition table. I've installed my system on software raid1 (mdadm) using md0(sda1,sdb1) for swap, md1(sda2, sdb2) for /, md2 (sda3,sdb3) for /home. From several how-to concerning raid1 installation, I must put each partition on a different md devices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the

--- test-data/phony-guests/Makefile.am | 3 +-- test-data/phony-guests/make-archlinux-img.sh | 4 ++-- test-data/phony-guests/make-coreos-img.sh | 10 ++++---- test-data/phony-guests/make-debian-img.sh | 10 ++++---- test-data/phony-guests/make-fedora-img.pl | 34 ++++++++++++++-------------- test-data/phony-guests/make-ubuntu-img.sh | 14 ++++++------

This series fixes inspection in the case that fstab contains references to md devices. I've made a few changes since the previous posting, which I've summarised below. [PATCH 1/8] build: Create an MD variant of the dummy Fedora image I've double checked that no timestamp is required in the Makefile. The script will not run a second time to build fedora-md2.img. [PATCH 2/8] build:

hi all! back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array. something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago, upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this, one for /dev/md0, one for /dev/md1, one for /dev/md125 and one for /dev/md126: Subject: DegradedArray

My ThinkStation runs CentOS 7 which I installed on a BIOS RAID 0 setup with two identical 256 Gb SSDs after removing Windows. It runs fine but I just discovered in gparted something that does not seem right: - Launching gparted it complains "invalid argument during seek for red on /dev/md126" and when I click on Ignore I get another error "The backup GPT table is corrupt, but the

Le 04/12/2018 ? 23:50, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > In the rescue mode, recreate the partition table which was on the sdb > by copying over what is on sda > > > sfdisk ?d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb > > This will give the kernel enough to know it has things to do on > rebuilding parts. Once I made sure I retrieved all my data, I followed your suggestion, and it looks

> My ThinkStation runs CentOS 7 which I installed on a BIOS RAID 0 setup > with two identical 256 Gb SSDs after removing Windows. It runs fine but I > just discovered in gparted something that does not seem right: > > - Launching gparted it complains "invalid argument during seek for red on > /dev/md126" and when I click on Ignore I get another error "The backup

Dear gluster team, I have installed glusterfs on my servers for the storage. Machine: x86_64-redhat-linux I have created volumes with rdma protocol for infiniband. I have mount with acl option on server and client. When I run setfacl for glusterfs mount point it works fine but when i do it for nfs mount it says. setfacl <dir> : operation not supported. The logs created in server are as

Hi, I''m trying to execute some javascript in the browser after completing my create action in the controller. Here''s how I''m doing it: In my controller: def create # exectue some code js = render_to_string(:layout => false, :template => "planned_meals/meal.js.coffee.erb") render :js => js end Two questions: 1) Am I going about it the

Karolin Seeger wrote: > o Fix creation and installation of shared libraries. On Solaris 10 (Solaris 10 5/08 s10s_u5wos_10 SPARC), the build completes, but starting the daemons results in: # /etc/init.d/samba start ld.so.1: smbd: fatal: libtalloc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed ld.so.1: nmbd: fatal: libtalloc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed

Not too sure what this is about but it is repeatable : On Solaris 8 ( either Sparc or x86 ) after the config stage I get : Text relocation remains referenced against symbol offset in file <unknown> 0x0 lib/ldb/common/ldb_modules.o ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections any thoughts ? The configuration is fine .. same as with samba 3.0.31 actually and

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:44:50PM -0400, Shukang Zhou wrote: > I met some errors when I tried to build LLVM. The tar file is > llvm-1.3.tar.gz. I am using a sparc machine with gcc 3.2.2. > > ------------- > Compiling SparcV9CodeEmitter.cpp > /uf24/zhou/research/llvm/src/lib/Target/SparcV9/SparcV9CodeEmitter.cpp: In > static member function `static void >

I just noticed that the clang in Xcode 3.2.2 was bumped to 1.0.2. How does the Apple clang versioning numbering relate to that used for the llvm.org version of clang? In particular, what version of clang will llvm 2.7 ship with? I assume that Xcode 3.2.2 must be using clang 2.6, no? Jack

I can't seem to login with only a TGS? (i.e. no password) Do I need another patch to have that part work? Password auth seems to be working against the KDC just fine. TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin at coremetrics.com "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694 Summary: build fails: missing inet_ntoa.h on IRIX 6.3 and gcc 3.2.2 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p1 Platform: MIPS OS/Version: IRIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: