I just noticed that the clang in Xcode 3.2.2 was bumped to 1.0.2. How does the Apple clang versioning numbering relate to that used for the llvm.org version of clang? In particular, what version of clang will llvm 2.7 ship with? I assume that Xcode 3.2.2 must be using clang 2.6, no? Jack
On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:> I just noticed that the clang in Xcode 3.2.2 was > bumped to 1.0.2. How does the Apple clang versioning > numbering relate to that used for the llvm.org version > of clang? In particular, what version of clang will > llvm 2.7 ship with? I assume that Xcode 3.2.2 must be > using clang 2.6, no?Typically the version numbers are completely unrelated and are not based on "official" llvm.org releases. For more details you should ask through official apple channels. -Chris
Reasonably Related Threads
- archiving LTO objects broken for current Xcode releases
- archiving LTO objects broken for current Xcode releases
- [cfe-dev] llvm.org pre-built clang significantly slower than apple/xcode clang
- cmake 3.7.0-rc1 breaks stage2 bootstrap in openmp on 10.11 with Xcode 8
- [LLVMdev] A bug in LLVM-GCC 4.2 with inlining __exchange_and_add