similar to: CentOS 6: snort, fwlogwatch

I have a perferctly working shorewall system, with basic configuration (external real IP, one private address internal network with some forwarded services), and log handling with fwlogwatch. My problem is that I can''t find out how to make something like this with shorewall (TCP-connections only): - Allow protocol x connections from IP x.x.x.x without logging - Allow protocol x

Hallo, I am installing snort from source. Besides of a lot of additional libraries, I needed a link ln -vfs /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.16 /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so Are there reasons not to install with yum install mysql-devel ? I have found many discussions to add this link in context of installing from source, nor only for snort. Best regards Helmut -------------- next

FYI Kris ----- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> ----- X-Original-To: kkenn@localhost Delivered-To: kkenn@localhost.obsecurity.org Delivered-To: kris@freebsd.org Delivered-To: ports-committers@freebsd.org From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:45:03 -0700 (PDT) To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,

Package: logcheck-database Hey, I created a logcheck ignore file for Snort with stuff I don't particularly want to see every day. The one line with the warning in it is questionable, so leave it in or out at your discretion. Also, my regex skills are not as good as they could be, so there are probably mistakes, or things that could be simplified more. Rules are below: ^\w{3} [

Ladies/Gents, /etc/init.d/snortd more snortd #!/bin/sh # Description: start up script for snort # chkconfig: 2345 40 60 # # Source function library. . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions # case "$1" in # 'start') echo "Starting up Snort..." /prod/snort/bin/snort -c /prod/snort/etc/snort.conf -D -g snort -u snort -i eth0 -l /var/log/snort echo "Done." ;; #

I've been prowling through the FreeBSD and Snort list archives in search of information on setting up snort on a FreeBSD bridge(4) that logs to a remote postgres box via a third interface (hme0) Snort is being started with the following command: /usr/local/bin/snort -A full -D -e -d -s -i fxp0 -c /usr /local/etc/snort.conf Where fxp0 and fxp1 are in the bridge output from sysctl:

I figured that someone reading this list might want to take a look at the proceeding, considering that the version of Snort in FreeBSD ports -is- affected. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> > To: cert-advisory@cert.org > Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-13 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Snort Preprocessors > Date: 17 Apr 2003 11:30:47 -0400

Hi All, I am facing a problem when using ULOG daemon and SNORT (inline mode) with iptables. My set up is like this. 1. I need ULOG daemon to log firewall logs to MYSQL database. 2. I need SNORT in inline mode for intrusion prevention. Both can work fine induvidually with iptables. But ULOG daemon cannot work when SNORT is also running. Probably the reason is that snort also hooks to

Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline

hello list, i''ve set up shorewall and snort inline on a linux box. it works, but snort only sees traffic from new connections. and this is because shorewall automatically generates rules to accept established and related connections. how can i force shorewall to queue everything, so that snort can scan the hole traffic like in IDS mode. The setup i have now is really simple, just 2 zones

Hi, I''m new to the list, but have been through the documentation, archives, etc. looking for more info... I''ve been using shorewall 1.3.14 for a few months now, has been working well from day one. I''m also using it with dshield (submitting logs and using the block list). I''m thinking of adding snort-inline to the mix (I run apache and postfix on the same box,

Dear all, I''m setting up a new gateway for a small network (under 30 users)Gw will host the following services:shorewalldnsproxy i''m considering installing snort.can i do so on the same exact box ? is there any security risk of doing so ? box would have 4 ISPs and two internal interfaces. Any recommendation about the optimal setup of snort and shorewall (or if you suggest

----- Forwarded message from Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> ----- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0700 From: Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: snort, postgres, bridge User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i I've been prowling through the FreeBSD and Snort list archives in search of information on setting up snort on a FreeBSD bridge(4) that logs

Hello all: I tried to install snort under /usr/ports/security and have some problems. with "make all", I checked every item on the menu but I got error messages: ////////////////////////////// laptop# make all ===> snort-2.8.1_1 is marked as broken: FLEXRESP2 patch file does not incorporate cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/snort.

I made an atempt to run snort_inline and shorewall on the same system but I could not get snort to see the packets. Maybe someone with a little more iptables knowledge could tell me what I''m doing wrong or if its possible to have the systems setup so that it places packets that the firewall would allow into QUEUE. After setting up and starting shorewall I then issue the following

Situation: We are providing hosting services. I've grown tired of the various kiddie scripts/dictionary attacks on various services. The latest has been against vsftpd, on systems that I can't easily control vs. putting strict limits on ssh. We simply have too many users entering from too many networks many with dynamic IP addresses. Enter.... thinking about LIDS or Log Based

You are awesome!!!! -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Tom Eastep Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:11 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline IDS (snort-inlineorhogwash) Tom Eastep wrote: > Thibodeau, Jamie L. wrote: >

Hi all, I have been troubled with the traffic flow on the XCP 1.6 and XCP 0.5. - I have 4 servers in VLAN2 on port b12,b13,b14,b15 (these servers work on a XCP 0.5) - on port a3 have have mirrort al ports from a1,a2,a4-b24 - have a other HP server with XCP1.6 with (Debian 6.0.6 as host) and install snort. this has 2 eth carts in it. Eth0 is plugt in the VLAN2 network and

I would add the below: -Recommend using CentOS 4.0 -Use squid rpm, no tar (this is for new users I'm guessing). -Recommend using etherape and iptraf (available as rpms) for a graphical overview of traffic. http://etherape.sourceforge.net/ -Recommend the use of chkrootkit, and TCP Wrappers (at the least put ALL: ALL EXCEPT PARANOID in /etc/hosts.allow) to protect servers. -Provide some

Hi all, I need to monitor all traffic and block bad requests on my guest machines and also on my xen host. To accomplish this I think to install snort on my dom0 host (rhel5). Somebody have tried this? What about performance on guests?? Many thanks ... -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list