similar to: non PAE support

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:16:26 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Paravirt breaks CONFIG_X86_PAE=y compilation: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC init/main.o > In file included from include2/asm/pgtable.h:245, > from > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/include/linux/mm.h:40, > from >

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:16:26 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Paravirt breaks CONFIG_X86_PAE=y compilation: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC init/main.o > In file included from include2/asm/pgtable.h:245, > from > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/include/linux/mm.h:40, > from >

Given that dom0 is itself doesn''t managed the memory directly that you only need to compile HIGHMEM4G into the dom0 or domU kernels if you intend to use more than 1G in one domX instances. ie. Even if you have more than 1Gb of total physical memory, if none of the domX use more than 1Gb of memory, there is no need to compile in HIGHMEM4G. Or, does dom0 need to be compiled with this in

I using the asterisk yum repository at http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/5/current to install a vanilla asterisk. All went well on my development server, which is a fully up to date CentOS5 machine. But now I am trying to do the same with my production server, which is an OEL5 machine with the 2.6.18-128.el5PAE kernel. This throws a dependency error for kmod-dahdi-linux.

On 2014?03?07? 23:05, Ady wrote: > I understand that these remarks might seem not the main issue, but I > tend to think that once you are successful while using only "default" > > values and in a minimalistic case, you could add complexity > (different paths, multiple firmwares, additional kernels, multiple > cfg files...). Ady, Thanks. I will follow your advice to

While, as discussed, the performance impact of this option is certainly higher than on native Linux, the option should not be entirely disallowed if people want to sacrifice performance for less lowmem pressure. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: sle10-sp1-2007-01-10/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---

Hi folks My ultimate goal is to be able to add an initramfs to the end my syslinux.cfg resulting in an additional initramfs being loaded when the system boots. So I need to work out how to get initrd+= to work. I?ve been trying for days now everything I possibly can to get initrd+= to work but nothing I do works. I've also been trying to get initrdfile= to work but no success with that

On 08/06/18 19:38, Phil Perry wrote: > On 08/06/18 15:54, lejeczek wrote: >> hi >> >> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg >> >> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' >> >> I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is >> fricking working.. >> I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor

Hi list, Here is the idea. I am running a domU out of a partition on a USB drive. I use the other partition to store the domU state. Then I carry this USB key to my office and restore the VM at the point where I left it. Thus I am trying to use xen''s virtualization to carry my desktop on a USB key. I have put up a web page explaining the details and a script to prepare the USB key.

hi how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working.. I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor failure) so if you try just the command line do not believe it, because later as it executes %if you will see process does not see these definitions. many

Greetings one and all. I'm a unix newbe....so deal with me here. I have a .iso copy of syslinux 1.67 (which actually might be ISOlinux??) that I boot from CD (ramdisk version...no HD needed)... but my version doesnt have the mkdosfs utility on it. I was looking for an executable that would work with this version... can someone point me toward such an animal??? :Pat

Hi, I get the same error as mentioned in http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/error-in-memCompress-in-make-check-td3318922.html I try to compile R 2.12.2 under Tinycore 3.5.1 running in VirtualBox 4.0.4. Since first xz was not installed I must have used the internal version which comes with the R source tar ball. But after installing the xz 5.0.0 extension the error remained. Any idea what else I

When a USBstiked-syslinux starts, it's the PC's firmare that's reading the USB ? But once the USBsyslinux takes over, has IT also got a USB driver? Since my MotherBoard & 2009 Slackware built USBstik syslinux booter were stolen I bought a <WinTel> laptop and USBextender to access my old IDE & SATA disks. With WinTel's new arrangement of not allowing the tail of the

Hello. Up to version 3.0.4, I did the following to get two xen kernels (dom0 and domU) with my own config: wget http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/downloads/... make xen make tools make docs make linux-2.6-xen0-config CONFIGMODE=menuconfig make linux-2.6-xen0-build make linux-2.6-xen0-install make linux-2.6-xen0-dist make linux-2.6-xenU-config CONFIGMODE=menuconfig make

Hi! Info OS: TinyCore Linux 4.5.6 NUT version: 2.6.4 NUT innstallation method: source tarball Device name: Eaton Ellipse ups eco 1600 usb din (EL1600USBDIN) /usr/local/ups/etc/ups.conf file: [eaton] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto When I run: root at Dalen:/usr/local/ups/bin/upsdrvctl start eaton I get this error message: Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.6.4

Previously I've been using a laptop with an "Aptio Setup Utility...2015" to "Disable UEFI Boot" and allow a USBstik with partition1 having: /boot/isolinux/isolinux.bin , isolinux.cfg , menu.c32...etc. to boot 64bit TinyCore. Now this newer laptop has: "Aptio Setup Utility...2018" which is completely different from the 2015 version. I fail to boot linux from

Hello, I supose that a new version of pigeonhole is on the way because version 0.4.13 does not compile against dovecot 2.2.23 This is the error that I get gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../src/lib-sieve -I../../../src/lib-sieve/util -I../../../src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment -I/home/jc/rpmbuild/BUILD/dovecot-2.2.23/src/imap

Is there anyway we can get rid of this crap on this list? It''s getting old fast. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi list, I'm trying to create an asterisk 1.8 rpm with SRTP. I found mention of a libsrtp rpm, <http://qutecom.ipex.cz/RPMS/srtp-1.4.4-1.i386.rpm > in these instructions, <http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SRTP> but it is unreachable (by me, anyway). The libSRTP source is here, <http://srtp.sourceforge.net/download.html>. Has this already been packaged for

has anyone implemented any sort of 'secure boot' using TPM 1.2 modules on the server boards using CentOS 6.x ? I'm not finding much concrete stuff on how to setup and manage a system like this, but I've been asked to research it for a security application internally at my job. our primary application for the TPM is for client authentication certificates in an SSL application