similar to: Some relevant information

I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that would install httpd without including it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

Typically, RPM's from RedHat or Fedora are pretty dependent on glibc and other system libraries. Newer version of RedHat will have newer versions of glibc, so the official packages are often not compatible with older versions. Sernet may have precompiled RPM's that may be useful. http://sernet.de/en/samba/samba-3/ If not you will probably need to compile from source. Or move to a

Johnny Hughes wrote: > No, CentOS-8 uses different shared libraries and a different version > of the compiler than CentOS-7, so you can not run items compiled for > CentOS-7 on CentOS-8. The kernel does not rely on userspace libraries. -- Dimitri Zelenkin Devexperts, Inc

Can someone point me at how the machine account plays into permitting access here? [it] path = /mnt/data/samba/data/it valid users = CUSTOMER\sgw CUSTOMER\fhäu @CUSTOMER\edv read only = No browseable = No A user out of the group "edv" uses the PC "p10013". Sometimes he gets access, sometimes not. Logs show: (a) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [P10013$]

I’m getting errors with replication Samba 4.9.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 6 Samba DC’s at 3 sites I recently joined a Win2k8 R2 server to the domain and promoted it to domain controller. The replication was working before that, and not working after. I didn’t realize the problems and tried to join a Win2012 R2 server and promote to DC as well. That also failed with an error about replication failures.

Dear List, I updated to samba 4.12.10-SerNet-Debian-9.buster from 4.12.9 and did a gluster volume set volume performance.write-behind off Now I get this in /var/log/syslog and randomly people don't get access to a shae. Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]: [2020/11/09 15:56:14.078120,? 0] ../../source3/lib/popt_common.c:68(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn) Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]:??

On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 14:43 +1030, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > > Good idea. > First step is building Samba from source which is not a fun > experience on FreeBSD :( We do honestly want to make this easier. Now of course that doesn't help for a historical bisect, but we are open to and encourage up- streaming of patches from ports. (We also ask that patches we reject - this

Hello, I switched the first member server in production from 3.6 to 4.1. But since that, several times per day, smbd processes are crashing on that machine. Has anybody encountered this, too? [2013/11/05 04:14:43.532768, 0, pid=91892] ../source3/lib/popt_common.c:67(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn) talloc: access after free error - first free may be at ../source3/smbd/open.c:1529 [2013/11/05

Am 2015-12-29 um 18:59 schrieb Rowland penny: > NO! This will give you precisely 0 users > > config * == the range the 'builtin' users will be mapped to. > config customer == the range for all the domain users that have a > uidNumber attribute. If a user doesn't have a uidNumber attribute > containing a number inside the range set in smb.conf (in your case >

I've been spending some time backporting Samba 4.0.3 from Fedora 19 to RHEL 6, partly as proof of concept, partly to make it available to others. I've published my work at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ The key RPM building tools are at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba-4.0.3-srpm/ And there are dependencies listed for libtalloc, libtevent,

Hello, according to this: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/merge_requests/26 samba should support DNS record scavenging is this only true for the internal DNS or also BIND? Should this work? I enabled it (dns zone scavenging = yes) to try it out and got this (didn't enable it from the DNS Manager tool as I got the error first): Jul 24 16:39:20 dc1 samba[29071]: [2019/07/24

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS

Dear Jeremy, thanks for your reply. I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the [global] section? I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again. Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it. Best Bene Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via

According to http://www.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/specfile.html a Version: tag can contain a hyphen, as the tarball for the source I am compiling is named 2.3-pre4 etc. When I try to build it I get an error about the illegal char? Anyone know about the discrepancy between the docs and RHEL's rpmbuild? Without recreating a new tarball and bungling the name how does one gracefully handle this?

Hi, My system: OS: Centos 6.4? Samba: 3.6.16 I'm trying to build the RPMS from the packaging/RHEL directory.? After I patched the samba.spec file the build is successful.? All packages install without an issue. But when I try to install the SSSD, its dependencies get errors that it conflicts with libtalloc, libtdb and libtevent. from the samba-common. If I try to use the external

Hi, I'm testing samba4 alpha 12 on Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Server I followed this HOWTO http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO All seems ok. Now, i want get the samba users, groups in my server with winbind I find this howto http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind "The current installation process put the library libnss_winbind.so in <PATH_TO_SAMBA>/lib (ie.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:12:24AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Not that I know of. Can you run winbindd under valgrind ? > Should help debug this. this is the only waring regardless read/write that valgrind reports: ==16475== Syscall param writev(vector[...]) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==16475== at 0xBB32337: writev (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so) ==16475== by 0xA4AC8E4:

Am 20.05.19 um 14:31 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > Samba 4.10.0 was the first version that works with python3 and whilst > this may not have a bearing on your problem, is python3 installed. No python3 is installed. I would also saume that sernet would pull in python3 if needed (this did not happen). > > Of course this may not be a problem if the Sernet packages have been >

So I decided to dump Samba 2.2.0 on Solaris 8 due to the problems I had getting it to connect to Vista, so I installed Samba 3.4.2 as downloaded from Sunfreeware.com, with prereqs; krb5-1.7-sol8-sparc-local openssl-1.0.0-sol8-sparc-local libgcc-3.4.6-sol8-sparc-local popt-1.14-sol8-sparc-local libiconv-1.13.1-sol8-sparc-local readline-5.2-sol8-sparc-local

Dear list, I keep getting strange "internal error"s from smbd. I increased the log level to 3 and pasted the relevant log snippet. Does anyone know (or guess) what's going on? What should I check? Any direction to investigate? Thanks a lot, Sascha ? =============================================================== [2014/03/24 13:28:49.787910, ?0, pid=13041, effective(3000026, 20),