similar to: rpm 9.7.3 for epel-6 and centos 5.5

hello all the people I'd call http://people.redhat.com/ atkac ~ / official member of the team redhat for news of future versions of bind 9.7 for el5 sincerely -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

hello list centos. I installed the packages libp11 and engine_pkcs11 of fedora core 14 on my centos 5.5 to allow me to compile the latest version of bind. this is the only way I found to compile bind 9.7.3. you know another way to compile bind 9.7.3 on centos 5.5 thanks for all your return -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7

hi guys hi master of "Fu" any information for dovecot update on centos 5 I am looking for information on the people running release 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 of dovecot I edited rpms sources here. http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.0-2.centme.el5.src.rpm http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.1-2.centme.el5.src.rpm compilation goes well but after installation and restart the services I

upgrade question is it possible to imagine during an upgrade from centos 5 to 6 to keep the named directory /etc and /var unchanged if an update as simple as possible. can this be -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting

Hi, sorry if this has been covered, I searched google for this but can't find an answer (maybe I am trying the incorrect search terms). What is bind97? What are the differences between bind97 and bind? thanks Jobst -- Fortune: No such file or directory. | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jobst at barrett.com.au, General Manager | | |0| Barrett Consulting Group P/L & The

Hi Timo in the present work would be possible to walk to another folder for deleted_to_trash please answer me -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://about.me/fakessh http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting

hi folks hi timo , is a good day for you I use a double deliverance root and user i use lda deliver dovecot authentification and since the switch to 2.0.4 I encounter the problem that the box Maildir root for the name of the INBOX after passing sieve is the type root at nsXXXX.ovh.net how to correct the problem Timo your lights --

hello centos guru I encounter a problem with centos 6 perl -MCPAN -e shell install MyModule well I installed the module but in the standard repertoire of the user but not in the directory of the perl distribution how to remedy this problem cpan modules installed in /usr/lib/perl/ please help me I can not solve this problem alone sincerely --

Hi all Hi list my linux box is CentOS 5.3 it is properly updated I use the old old ?stable version 0.1.1 of roundcubemail , which is contained in the deposit EPEL I preferred to continue using the version contained in the official repositories of CentOS I configure a user roundcubemail on my mysql server Here are the commands that I have applied to the server mysql mysql -u roundcubemail -p

hello centos list hello guys hello master of "Fu" how to create a rpm package for centos 5 with an archive tar.xz. I possess a source rpm of gnutls http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/gnutls-2.12.16-1.el5.src.rpm and I would try to compile the latest version of gnutls What is the correct procedure to build an rpm with this type of package tar.xz sincerely --

hello centos list hello guys hello master of Fu I want to know the different changes to be applied in the config bind97 because I use dnssec and differences may be present. I do not know they are the differences that may exist between centos 5.7 and bind to bind to centos 6.2 I want to know the small differences that may be present in the config bind in the concerns of my desire to perform

Hello list, Sorry, if it has been asked, but searching throught list not give possitive answers. After upgrade to dovecot version 1.2.1 expire-tool stoped working. I have changed database format and config file to appropriative 1.2 version but: expire-tool.sh fails with: # dovecot -c /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf --exec-mail ext /usr/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool.sh Info: Loading modules from

hu guys I regularly read this list I can usually find me in the excellent documentation apache. I'm in front of a very strange problem I possess two desktop machines which works with the Apache server with centos 6 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other. I use the apache config file here that provides standard distribution any help for me sincerely --

hello guys hello centos list hello master of "Fu" I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc. what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school sincerely -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake

hello folks hello Timo hello all the guru I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve script is silently discard after delivery but never returned to the inbox all testimonials are welcome -- ?http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 ?gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

hi timo very very good job you realize for the community here I have a very strange problem with doveadm I actually use a configuration file parameters in which the parameters are placed carefully My problem appears when I run this command doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d i post command and result to the terminal [fakessh at r13151 ~]$ doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore

I notice that CentOS 5.6 release notes say that bind97 is now included. However, my CentOS 5.6 installations have bind 9.3. I'm guessing that bind97 is not installed by default, due to the possibility of config file breakage or something. It looks like you have to explicitly install the bind97* packages. I don't see anything in the release notes about how to handle the transition from

hello guys hello master Timo i build the last release of dovecot on my centos 5 work well and fine but what the correct value for client limit in service auth { client_limit=6000 } and service anvil { client_limit=6000 } my current dovecot -n ks37777 i386]# dovecot -n # 2.1.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.31.5-xxxx-rt14-ipv6-32 i686 CentOS release 5.7 (Final) auth_mechanisms =

Hi Timo and the other directors of the following pigeonhole dovecot sieve I wonder what are the strengths and weaknesses of my config, and what do I need to change to stick more to a best configuration r13151 ~]# /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32.2-xxxx-grs-ipv6-32 i686 CentOS release 5.5 (Final) auth_mechanisms = plain login base_dir =

Hi, We are (still) mainly using CentOS 5 (5.8 x86_64). As CentOS / EL 5 standard OpenLDAP packages are rather old (2.3.x), we've been using LTB OpenLDAP packages ( http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap), which get installed in non-standard file system locations. I am not much experienced in building RPMs and preparing spec files. We are currently using dovecot RPM packages from