similar to: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem

Hi ,guys : I reboot my computer which is installed the CentOS 5.4 64 bits just now and find that SCIM service does not start And the error message is these: root at test <root at camlit> ~: tailf /var/log/message xxxx scim-bridge: Another agent is running .. xxx scim-bridge: Failed to allocate the agent . Exitting .... .... .... I also run this command "ps aux |grep scim

Dear all, ? ?I am using Samba + PDC LDAP in a single server. From last month onward i am facing problem When I set manualy the acl (setfacl -m g:group:rwx the_file) It's ok, the other domain member see the ACL But when I set the acl with a Windows Workstation, that's don't work it gives the furnished error : ? sysadm at sangam:/var/log/samba$ tailf log.r-sys-03703 ? [2009/11/08

Hi,guys: I am trying to setup OpenLDAP on CentOS 5.3 i386 for a client of mine. everytime I try running 'service ldap start', I get the following in syslog: root at xx ~: tailf /var/log/messages .....slaptest: sql_select option missing ....slaptest: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available ....slapd[4392]: sql_select option missing ....slapd[4392]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism

Hello Folks; I have a dilemma: I have a client with Asterisk 1.4x and he needs to have a record of all incoming calls - caller ID and date/time is sufficient. Since I am not an Asterisk wizard, I am doing it this way. I set a cron job to tailf the last 10 lines of the Master.csv file and package those nicely in an email. However, I can see some inefficiencies in this. Main one is what if

I'm running samba 4.1.6 as a PDC on ubuntu 14.04. I'm following these guides to setup print shares https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_as_a_print_server https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs When I go to my windows workstation to change the ACL's on the print$ share I can get into the security tab and I can change the security options

Regarding the insertion of "user_xattr,acl,barrier=1" in to /etc/fstab file. The Sambawiki page 'https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/OS_Requirements' has instructions there for ext4 to include this. I seen it commented here, in the mailing list, many time that this is now default for ext4. Maybe the wiki page should be changed? (Just a suggestion, you guys always give great

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq From: aatteka at nicira.com To: dano1988 at hotmail.it CC: libvir-list at redhat.com; roberto.sassu at polito.it; paolo.smiraglia at polito.it; dev at openvswitch.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it> wrote: I think I could try the first solution.

Hi CentOS4.2 - Is it possible to have an older version of gcc as well as the one that ships with this OS? I need to compile aspseek to run on this distro but it seems to only like older gcc's any ideas?

Hi all I would like to install the minimal level of Centos, with yum & selinux on my servers during the basic install from CD with Anaconda and then use yum to install whatever application is major on that server, so that yum installs its dependencies only, thus keeping to the target of installing only what is needed on a server. Please advise pros/cons of this approach and how to do it. I

Currently we have RH7.3 with compiler gcc 2.96.x My mission, should I choose to accept it, involves moving our embedded application to CentOS 4.1 with gcc 3.x Problem is that about 1/2 million lines of code that gcc 2.96 accepts gives fatal fits to the gcc 3.x compiler from CentOS 4.1 I don't know how many fatal fits, as some disguise others etc. "Can't find register to

After reading through the various SELinux threads, I really became quite perturbed. I mean, really quite perturbed. As an IT Director (and the entire IT department, currently), if I were hiring a sysadmin I know for a fact that someone whose first response to a question on why something doesn't work is 'turn it off' would not get a job here. Neither would a sysadmin with as much

I can't choose LILO as boot loader anymore in the install process? And what is the advantages in GRUP vs. LILO that are so great that LILO has been deleted all together? One big disadvantages when forced to use GRUB is that it is a hassle to make the disks in a RAID1 bootable. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-March/msg05935.html and RAID1 seems pretty useless when it is the

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:06:59PM +0000, James Zuelow via samba wrote: > We have a wireless network that uses 802.1x authentication, in which domain joined computers use their machine credentials to connect. > > > Windows machines do this automatically, and until recently Linux computers could join using wicd, wpa-supplicant, and a simple script that would retrieve the machine

We have a wireless network that uses 802.1x authentication, in which domain joined computers use their machine credentials to connect. Windows machines do this automatically, and until recently Linux computers could join using wicd, wpa-supplicant, and a simple script that would retrieve the machine password with tdbdump. ( specifically tdbdump -k SECRETS/MACHINE_PASSWORD/DOMAIN

Hello, I have: CentOS4.1 x86_64 directly-attached Infortrend 9TB array QLogic HBA seen as sdb GPT label created in parted I want one single 9TB ext3 partition. I am experiencing crazy behavior from mke2fs / mkfs.ext3 (tried both). If I create partitions in parted up to approx 4,100,000 MB in parted, mkfs.ext3 works great. It lists the right number of blocks and creates a filesystem that fills

Is this because the mirrors are busy? I did update to CentOS 4.2 yesterday but now... [root at srv1 file-4.15]# yum install php-devel php-imap Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories dag 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: update failure: repodata/repomd.xml from update: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.

Agreed! Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> craigwhite at azapple.com 10/12/05 09:35AM >>> List owners of course have the option to knock people out but are almost always wisest not to use that power except when absolutely necessary and I'm quite certain that it hadn't reached that state.

I am getting tons of these messages since I updated to 4.2 Nov 12 12:21:39 srv1 dbus: Can't send to audit system: USER_AVC pid=2839 uid=81 loginuid=-1 message=avc: denied { send_msg } for scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t tcontext=user_u:system_r:initrc_t tclass=dbus Now I can see this process... # ps aux|grep 2839 dbus 2839 0.0 0.3 16168 1888 ? Ssl Nov11 0:13 dbus-

Haven't gotten any tips on a solution to the problem below. It happened again this weekend. My next test steps (order not determined): 1. Downgrade to CentOS 4 2. Swap out PERC controller with a spare I have never had a problem with the PERC4/DC controllers on our other machines (RHEL3/4, CentOS 4). Although, I've no other machine that has 5 300G Fujitsu SCSI drives either. Any

Dear, all. I am pulling my hair because I could not find any error messsages that could point me to a fix to my problem. The directory I want to share was mounted on /home with drbd and heartbeat but then my users could not access any shares / their home directories. However, if I set up shares else where on my box like share under /opt or /usr/local, then the same users would be able to access