similar to: [OT] building src rpm on RHEL5 using mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680144

Steps tried: Install from centos 5.5 x86_64 disc, locks up after reboot at GRUB (FAILS) Boot centos 5.5 x86_64 install drop to shell and chroot (WORKS) Boot fedora 13 isolinux disc, choose boot hard disk, launches centos 5.5 grub (WORKS) Compiled and installed grub package from fedora 13 on centos 5.5 x86_64 same problem. (FAILS) Boot fedora 13 isolinux disc, choose boot hard disk, launches

I don't mean to ruffle any feathers, but has this been properly resolved? It shows that a patch has been submitted to allow connections over TLS, and that the bug has been closed, but the solution supplied doesn't actually address the problem - running Samba in ads mode in a domain with ldap signing. We do not have the ability to change that setting in the policy. Thank you, Scott

I'm having a similar issue on a new DC I've installed today: [root at theoden ~]# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>): uncaught exception - must be string, not None File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 176, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File

OK this is talking about downloading from rhn but does anyone have any tips with getting mrepo on a CentOS 5 box to be able to download from rhn reliably? Seemingly everything is configured OK as it downloads a package or 2 but mainly bombs out with... Error communicating with server. The message was: Forbidden avalon-framework-manual-4.1 avalon-framework-manual-4.1

Hi all, at first glance, samba3.20.pre2 seemed to crash at startup, so I posted a bug-report at bugzilla (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2916). After I installed this version in a seperate directory, so it wouldn't conflict with any existing *.tdb, but still use the same ldap-directory and the same smb.conf, it now starts. I assume that I have some .tdb-file or something alike,

We have a rsync'ed copy of the centos distro. We want to point our local machines at that, what is our next step? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Sr. Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443)

Hi, Since a --direct-io feature was requested a few times the past decade with little response and the actual patch is quite trivial, I patched both v3.0.9 and master branch and included the patches here. If this functionality is acceptable I don't mind spending the additional effort to update the documentation, etc. Beware that the underlying filesystem needs Direct I/O support,

Trying again to get a last call for Syslinux 4.04. I really want to release it this week. -hpa

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Negative <negativebinomial at gmail.com>wrote: > I built a new VM under KVM today and I've been getting a slew of message > that selinux is blocking virtmanager from reading the new image. This > doesn't seem to be doing any harm, but I wanted to check whether I should > simply run chcon on the image (if I can). > > Virtmanager

Hallo, H. Peter, Du meintest am 25.06.13: >> We could probably fabricate a script of some sort to check for the >> required version of gnu-efi, and skip it if not found, unless the >> user explicitly requested that the EFI files be built, in which case >> we'd error out. >> >> Thoughts? > Not really... let's just document "make bios". By

On Mon, 24 Jun, at 10:27:52AM, Thomas B?chler wrote: > Am 24.06.2013 04:10, schrieb Gene Cumm: > > In trying Syslinux-6.00 bios/core/pxelinux.0 with a 3.0.21 kernel, I got" > > > > "No linux boot function registered for firmware > > Booting kernel failed: Bad file number" > > > > Using Syslinux-5.10, the same kernel/initrd succeeds. > >

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 705490 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1843 Bug #705490 [src:xen] Uses deprecated RUN+="socket:" Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1843'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 705490:

Hi all, I have a little trouble with mrepo: yum groups doesn't seem to be setup correctly; if I do "yum grouplist" it only gives me Installed Groups: Yum Utilities Available Groups: FreeNX and NX XFCE-4.4 Horde Did I forget something on the mrepo.conf or similar? tia Lorenzo Quatrini

I think the Syslinux 5.00 branch is now at the point where I believe it it is feature complete and should be able to replace the main Syslinux branch. As such, it is important that we get wider testing, and especially that people let us know if and where it breaks. As of right now, there aren't any known bugs...

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 509885 http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4763 Bug#509885: does not cleanly update from logtail2 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4763. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Hello, i have 3 XCP 1.0.0 hosts in a pool, one of them is not enabled: xe host-param-list uuid=402f07f4-99c0-4501-9787-8dee8984e313 uuid ( RO) : 402f07f4-99c0-4501-9787-8dee8984e313 name-label ( RW): xcp1.domain.com name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer allowed-operations (SRO):

Hello everyone: * DNS does not have a "refresh rate". In DNS, the person running the domain determines what the "refresh rate" (it's called TTL in DNS) for their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of "once per hour" and my domains (maradns.org, etc.) have a TTL of one day. * As mentioned before, Scientific Linux 6.0 is out. What hasn't been

I am atempting to work with some rpms in the c5-testing repo. When I add: [c5-testing] name=CentOS-5 Testing baseurl=http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://dev.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-testing to centos-5-x86_64.cfg, saving as centos-5-x86_64-testdev.cfg I get the aformentioned error. Example [mockbuild at localhost ~]$ mock -r

Does the centos project maintain a copy of mock to install? If not which mock should I install? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333

[mock at ten-186 ~]$ mock php-5.1.6-27.el5.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while setup build Installing /builddir/build/SRPMS/php-5.1.6-27.src.rpm Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23317 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf php-5.1.6 + /bin/gzip