similar to: RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3. Optionally, one can wait on a backport.

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> wrote: > > N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is > using a release candidate! Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes difficult to vet. Further, no mirrors have been spotted, which is not to say there

Hello, What is the proper solution to the problem below the sig? For a similar issue, Phillip Guenther, procmail's maintainer, at <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.procmail/1623/match=error+writing+var+spool+mail> suggests "chmod g+s /usr/bin/procmail", but I'm reluctant. There are also suggestions that in this configuration the packager must make certain that

That just in from chunkhost.com, where you help them beta test Xen for $FREE :) regards/ldv/vaden at texoma.net

Hi, We're new to dovecot and like what we see so far, but Google doesn't seem to have much on this error message. What are the likely causes? Kind regards, Larry Vaden, CoFounder and CEO Internet Texoma, Inc. We Care About Your Connection The Market Leader In Texomaland Since 1995

> From: Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> > Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:03 PM > Subject: sources of bind-9.7.2-P3 rpms for Centos 4.8 and 5.5? > Our site running Centos 4.8 and 5.5 name servers was hacked with > the result that www.yahoo.com is now within our /19 and causing > some grief. Don't understand what you mean by 'within our /19'. Have your IP

Hello, Does anyone know of a good URL that covers the remote install/upgrade of a FC3 system to CentOS 4 or 5? We have one physically stranded FC3 system which is a name server and we need to upgrade to remove vulnerabilities. Kind regards/ldv Larry Vaden Internet Texoma, Inc.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Scot P. Floess <sfloess at nc.rr.com> wrote: > > I'd expect better behavior and conduct from someone who holds such a > title... <request for a learning moment> Since beauty is in the eye of the beholder(s), please select my most egregious post(s) and let me know said post(s) so that I have the opportunity to better modify my behavior with

Dovecot version 1.0.rc26. Situation is essentially a forklift upgrade to make more horsepower available for email. Given a new mail store using Postfix and Dovecot (Maildir), is it possible to transfer from the old mail box (running the same config) or will this generate problems with the various indices maintained by Dovecot? Kind regards and thanks/ldv Larry Vaden Internet Texoma, Inc.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> wrote: > For various reasons which seemingly fail the necessary/sufficient > tests with the benefit of hindsight, I attempted to migrate a shell > machine which is the beach front from which I work (not a production > server) from CentOS 5.5 to Scientific Linux 5.5 yesterday. > > Karanbir is quoted on this

Hello, Is anyone else having problems with the ssh session output stalling when ssh'd to another system and the command is running via sudo and a pager is being used (e.g., more)? Too highly reproducible :( to date, all known occurrences have involved Centos 4.3 servers; makes no difference whether client is RHEL WS 4.3, Centos 4.3 or FC 5 or WinDoze. Makes no difference if terminal

Mem: 2075040k total, 1331452k used, 743588k free, 50896k buffers Swap: 2031608k total, 144k used, 2031464k free, 1191532k cached SunFire X2100 running Centos 4.3. Linux maytag1.texoma.net 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL #1 Fri Jul 7 19:24:57 CDT 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux rgds/ldv

Are the problems with yum in the Centos 4.3->>4.4 upgrade process due to a forked or obsolete version of yum? I briefly scanned <https://lists.dulug.duke.edu> and didn't see any problems, but did see some incidents regarding yum hangs reported about a year ago. regarding the current upgrade, Seth Vidal in

I see that lighttpd 1.3.14 supports SCGI. lighttpd 1.3.14 - 2005-06-15 18:10 Changes ------- * added SCGI support via mod_scgi * added hash-based and round-robin load balancing to mod_proxy * fixed range requests larger than 2Gb * fixed compilation on Solaris * fixed endless loops in mod_fastcgi, mod_cgi and mod_proxy * fixed handling of URIs for ''+'' and

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:46 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > ? ? ? ?issue? ?I don't get it. ?You seem to think that money is the end > ? ? ? ?all be all for OSS. ?I would suggest that's a mindset you may > ? ? ? ?wish to change as money doesn't drive OSS. Are you saying there are no OSS folks who have lost their houses, their cars and their Internet

thanks/ldv

libssl.so.4 was erased by accident and now, e.g., iinvoking wget results in: wget: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root at mail src]# How does one go about restoring libssl.so.4? [I've tried Google, compiling current edition from source, yum install, but note 'yum remove openssl' would take out about 140

What are the likely cockpit errors involved when getting POOR results when running this test on an updated CentOS 5.2? Kind regards/ldv [root at shell ~]# dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT z.y.x.w.v.u.t.s.r.q.p.o.n.m.l.k.j.i.h.g.f.e.d.c.b.a.pt.dns-oarc.net. "a.b.c.d is POOR: 26 queries in 1.3 seconds from 1 ports with std dev 0.00"

Can an admin please moderate ALL posts from Larry Vaden, or remove him from the list? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532

<http://beranger.org/index.php?categ=17&offset=0>, but nothing specific about the named/bind showstopper. rgds/ldv