similar to: future version of bind for el5

hello centos list I recompile the source rpm fedora core 14 on my centos 5.5. I wrote a post on my blog to explain how I did. goo.gl/p0sqF I also recompile the rpm via koji to epel 6 and the result is possitive goo.gl/OQwIX package is on it safe sincerely -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 -------------- next

My DNS server has been running Centos for some time. I am in the process of upgrading it to Centos 5.5 (long overdue, I know). Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well, but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND list recommends against running a DNSSEC master zone on anything less than 9.6 and you really should be on 9.7. The thread

hi folks hi timo , is a good day for you I use a double deliverance root and user i use lda deliver dovecot authentification and since the switch to 2.0.4 I encounter the problem that the box Maildir root for the name of the INBOX after passing sieve is the type root at nsXXXX.ovh.net how to correct the problem Timo your lights --

hello list centos. I installed the packages libp11 and engine_pkcs11 of fedora core 14 on my centos 5.5 to allow me to compile the latest version of bind. this is the only way I found to compile bind 9.7.3. you know another way to compile bind 9.7.3 on centos 5.5 thanks for all your return -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7

hello centos list hello guys hello master of Fu I want to know the different changes to be applied in the config bind97 because I use dnssec and differences may be present. I do not know they are the differences that may exist between centos 5.7 and bind to bind to centos 6.2 I want to know the small differences that may be present in the config bind in the concerns of my desire to perform

hi guys hi master of "Fu" any information for dovecot update on centos 5 I am looking for information on the people running release 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 of dovecot I edited rpms sources here. http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.0-2.centme.el5.src.rpm http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.1-2.centme.el5.src.rpm compilation goes well but after installation and restart the services I

Hi Timo and the other directors of the following pigeonhole dovecot sieve I wonder what are the strengths and weaknesses of my config, and what do I need to change to stick more to a best configuration r13151 ~]# /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32.2-xxxx-grs-ipv6-32 i686 CentOS release 5.5 (Final) auth_mechanisms = plain login base_dir =

upgrade question is it possible to imagine during an upgrade from centos 5 to 6 to keep the named directory /etc and /var unchanged if an update as simple as possible. can this be -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting

Hi, sorry if this has been covered, I searched google for this but can't find an answer (maybe I am trying the incorrect search terms). What is bind97? What are the differences between bind97 and bind? thanks Jobst -- Fortune: No such file or directory. | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jobst at barrett.com.au, General Manager | | |0| Barrett Consulting Group P/L & The

Hi Timo in the present work would be possible to walk to another folder for deleted_to_trash please answer me -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://about.me/fakessh http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting

hello centos guru I encounter a problem with centos 6 perl -MCPAN -e shell install MyModule well I installed the module but in the standard repertoire of the user but not in the directory of the perl distribution how to remedy this problem cpan modules installed in /usr/lib/perl/ please help me I can not solve this problem alone sincerely --

hello centos list hello guys hello master of "Fu" how to create a rpm package for centos 5 with an archive tar.xz. I possess a source rpm of gnutls http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/gnutls-2.12.16-1.el5.src.rpm and I would try to compile the latest version of gnutls What is the correct procedure to build an rpm with this type of package tar.xz sincerely --

hi timo very very good job you realize for the community here I have a very strange problem with doveadm I actually use a configuration file parameters in which the parameters are placed carefully My problem appears when I run this command doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d i post command and result to the terminal [fakessh at r13151 ~]$ doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore

I notice that CentOS 5.6 release notes say that bind97 is now included. However, my CentOS 5.6 installations have bind 9.3. I'm guessing that bind97 is not installed by default, due to the possibility of config file breakage or something. It looks like you have to explicitly install the bind97* packages. I don't see anything in the release notes about how to handle the transition from

Sorry, folks. I wish our release developers well, and hope that they can open up their processes to allow much needed community involvment. But I've hopped to Scientific Linux and find it much more usable due to their willingness to publish updates even without the entire new release bundled, and the much timelier updates from the upstream vendor. php53 and bind97 are directly available for

rehello centos list after some modifications rpm fedora core 14 of bind-9.7.3 and patching. diff -u unpatched/configure.in patched/configure.in --- unpatched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:02:20.000000000 +0200 +++ patched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:03:48.000000000 +0200 @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ AC_C_INLINE AC_C_VOLATILE AC_CHECK_FUNC(sysctlbyname, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SYSCTLBYNAME))

hello folks hello Timo hello all the guru I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve script is silently discard after delivery but never returned to the inbox all testimonials are welcome -- ?http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 ?gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

hello centos network I installed poppassd (the deposit razor edge) to change easily passwords of users of my system I allow connections on port 106 that locally I have configured pam I did install the plugin roundcubemail password in webmail everything seems to work well my question is simple on my system for some users, I built chrooted well I manage to change the password of users with the

hu guys I regularly read this list I can usually find me in the excellent documentation apache. I'm in front of a very strange problem I possess two desktop machines which works with the Apache server with centos 6 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other. I use the apache config file here that provides standard distribution any help for me sincerely --

hello admin This is strange and dark: it receives more than one hundred updates and deposits are still not updated are welcome ... -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: