similar to: yum confusion...

Ah ah, the demo effect... just after I said I did not have much issues with repos... ^_^ A collegue installed some packages (for perconna) and since then a server insists on replacing 2 base packages with 2 rfx packages, even when I gave a lower priority to rfx... Installed: perl-IO-Compress-Base-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed: 1:perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed:

On 07/01/2015 02:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/1/2015 2:02 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> My Update Applet keeps giving me messages to install an update to a >> package I do not have installed. To make matters more confusing, when I >> actually try to install the package it wants to update, there is a >> problem with the installation. >> >> Any tips on how to

Hey, I ran into a yum conflict regarding an repoforge extra package obsoleting a base package. The thing is that I set a lower priority to repoforge extra... Any idea how come I ran into this issue...? The question is more about the yum priorities than repoforge. ... 1743 packages excluded due to repository priority protections ... --> Running transaction check ---> Package

On 07/02/2015 03:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> OK, here ya go -- >> >> Obsoleting Packages >> >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-Compress-Zlib.i686

For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I don't really understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all my attempts to sort it out have failed, so I need help, please. The current state is Skipping filters plugin, no data --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-Compress-Zlib.x86_64 0:2.020-119.el6 will be obsoleted ---> Package

Hi, I am trying to update my system with yum and I keep getting this error message. Thank you, Joe Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.mirror.lstn.net * epel: fedora-epel.mirror.lstn.net * extras: centos.mirror.lstn.net * rpmforge: mirror.hmc.edu * rpmforge-extras: mirror.hmc.edu * rpmforge-testing: mirror.hmc.edu *

Hello, I was following directions at: http://www.sogo.nu/english/support/faq/article/how-to-install-sogo-and-sope-through-yum-1.html to install SOGo on CentOS 5.9 and, noticing that among the dependencies is memcached and rpmforge includes a much more recent version than EPEL, I preferred rpmforge and therefore I set a higher priority for rpmforge repo (see below). [Note: I guess I could have

Hi, I''m running into something weird here. I''m using RH5.1 with tcp_wrappers 7.6. The syntax for hosts.allow and hosts.deny is: <service list> : <access list> [ : <shell_command> ] Everything works when I _don''t_ use the shell_command. I used the _exact_ line as in the man-pages utilising "safe_finger" (comes with tcp_wrappers), tcpdchk

On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > OK, here ya go -- > > Obsoleting Packages > > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-Compress-Zlib.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Mark <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote: > I have an old version of rkhunter installed on my CentOS 5 machine, > one I got from rpmforge. > > In my most recent attempts to update this, I get the following errors in yum: > : > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > perl-AnyEvent-5.240-1.el5.rf.noarch from rpmforge has depsolving problems >

I am wondering about updating the version of Spam Assassin on my CentOS 5 mail server. The current version, 3.3.1-4.el5 (stock RHEL version), has been 'leaking' recently. I suspect I need some newer match rules to detect some of the newer flavors of spam. I see that in rpmforge's extras repo is version 3.3.2-4.el5.rfx -- is this version worth installing? Are there even newer versions

My brain must be on knots somehow. I try to install rsync 3.x, which I know is in rpmforge repo for my architecture: https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22214 http://packages.sw.be/rsync/ But yum does not find it, however I try. I have installed yum-priorities. Rpmforge is low priority. But still... yum erase rsync # erase v2.6 from base repo yum --disablerepo=\*

I'm on RHES 4.x I downloaded 2 dovecot RPM packages from http://packages.sw.be/dovecot/ dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm 13-Nov-2010 22:15 1.8M RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit and dovecot-0.99.13-1.2.el4.test.i386.rpm 21-Feb-2005 16:57 693K RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit The first rpm fails with error below : # rpm -i ./dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm warning:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm developing some kernel module, so i need a stand alone qemu to test my kernel. But yum install qemu fails. After yum search qemu , i get this : gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch : Network boot loader roms supported by QEMU, .rom format qemu-img.x86_64 : QEMU command line tool for manipulating disk images libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64 : Sanlock lock

My Update Applet keeps giving me messages to install an update to a package I do not have installed. To make matters more confusing, when I actually try to install the package it wants to update, there is a problem with the installation. Any tips on how to resolve this? Is this somehow caused by the repositories I have enabled? -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "We can

At Sun, 15 Feb 2015 07:47:29 -0700 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > I have these available: > > http://mirrors.axint.net/repos/axis/x86_64/spamassassin-3.4.0-1.x86_64.rpm > http://mirrors.axint.net/repos/axis-source/spamassassin-3.4.0-1.src.rpm Thanks, I'll have a look. Is this a repo and is there repo metadata files available (eg something I can

Hi, attached is a patch by Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus.com> relative to 2.2.0p1. Description: OpenSSH does not allow port gatewaying by default. This means that only the local host can access forwarded ports. Adding "GatewayPorts yes" to .ssh/config usually does this job. Unfortunately, OpenSSH does not recognize the same hosts.allow/ hosts.deny options as ssh.com's sshd

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:49PM +1200, Peter wrote: > On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > > > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > > > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too

The latest snapshot works well for me, except for one minor annoyance. When logging into an account with an expired password, OpenSSH asks for the current login password twice and then it asks for the new password. Other than that, everything works swell. [fortezzo at entralla /root]$ ssh fortezzo at firrerre Warning: Permanently added 'firrerre,xx.xx.xx.xx' (DSA) to the list of known

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=948 Summary: high CPU in sshd after tcp_wrappers deny Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: