similar to: Basic Permissions Questions

Hi, I'm wondering, whether it's possible, to define an ACL on the mailbox itself. We use Dovecot 1.2.15 (included in Debian 6) and maildir filesystem layout: /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/new \ /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/cur Inbox /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/tmp / /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/.folder1/new \ /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/.folder1/cur folder1

Hi Guys! A simple question.. I never worked with ACL's and since my costumer want some access levels for some sub-foldes in shares, I am reading some manuals about that.. But.. Before apply some testings, I need some advices about this.. Here is my question... Parent folder (share): FOLDER Sub-folder1: PROJETC1 Sub-folder2: PROJECT2 User1: DIRECTOR Group: Director/Projects User2: Employee1

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba

On 20/03/2023 16:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 20/03/2023 16:22, Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder >> after configuration of a share. >> >> My folders look like: >> /var/folder1/folder2/ >> >> I created share1 on folder1 and

Hi list, ? After spending quite some time to figure out how users can share folders I now hope someone of you could help me out. I am quite sure its just a stupid mistake/misunderstanding?... I am using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with the shipped dovecot 2.0.19 When I login via telnet as user1 I get the following: 1 create folder1 1 OK Create completed. 2 setacl folder1 user2 rli 2 OK Setacl complete. 3

Folks; I couldn't find anything on my archive of the mailing list on this, and it may just be my mis-understanding, but: When I "ssh machine1 -l user1" as user2 on machine2, if user2 has the same uid on machine1, then user2's name ends up in lastlog, instead of user1's. This is a bit disconcerting when user2 is root, and root isn't allowed to remotely log in on

Hello, I have logging information for multiple machines, which I am trying to summarize and graph. So far, I process each host individually, but I would like to summarize the user count across multiple hosts. I want to answer the question "how many unique users logged in on a certain day across a group of machines"? I'm not quite sure how to scale the data frame and analysis to

Hi, Is this expected or not? From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> ? a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com"))

I have a dataset like this (dput for this below) which represents user computer sessions: username machine start end 1 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:44:18 2011-01-03 09:47:27 2 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:46:29 2011-01-03 10:09:16 3 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 14:07:36 2011-01-03 14:56:17 4 user1 D5599.domain.com

Hi all, I do have a mailbox-quota problem in dovecot 2.0.19 that is beond my understanding. Could someone pls. give me a hint. - user1 max. mailbox quota is set to 1GB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 15MB - user2 max. mailbox quota is set to 10MB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 10kB - user1 shares the folder 'shared_folder' to user2 with all rights (read, write ...) -

Basically, what I typed was: chown -R user2:user2 * chown -R user2:user2 .* chown -R user2:user2 *.* ...all in /home. Duh. I forgot which way recursive went. So, I then did: chown -R root:root * chown -R root:root .* chown -R root:root *.* ...this time in / to try and f things. Duh again. Other items need to have other owners & groups. So, how can I fix this? In MacOSX, there is a utility

Hi, looks like we detected a serious bug in dovecot's lmtp proxying where e-mails are delivered to the wrong user. The setup is: *) Dovecot is configured with "lmtp_proxy=yes" # Support proxying to other LMTP/SMTP servers by performing passdb lookups. lmtp_proxy = yes *) Postfix uses "dynamic recipient verification", so Postfix starts sending a (verify) mail by LMTP to

Hello I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work: Users can choose extensions 1-4 or 9 to tell why they're calling, and I'll send an e-mail to the person(s) to whom is involved. Extension 4 is actually for personal messages for User1, and extension 9 is for everyone (User1, User2, and User3). => For some reason, when the caller chooses extension 4, both User1 and User2

On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 09:59, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote: > On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi <tachibana at qualitia.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is this expected or not? >> >> From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> >> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> >>

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

Dear, I have a working Samba 3.5.6 running on one of my servers onto which (existing) users can successfully log on. Recently, I needed to add some projects and some users but I cannot succeed in letting these new users access the shares. The smb.conf file is very small and I had only 4 users until now. In the following smb.conf, projA_dirs is only accessed by user1, while projB_dirs is the new

On 02/06/2017 11:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:11:09 +0200 > Alnis Morics via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thank you, Rowland, for the reply. >> > >> And the nss tests as per Wiki seem to pass: >> > >> >> # getent passwd Administrator >>

I'm wondering if anyone is having problems when multiple users concurrently change their voicemail passwords. Consider the following scenario (based on vm_change_password() in app_voicemail.c): - user1 wishes to change his password so voicemail.conf is opened and read into a buffer - user1 changes his password - user2 wishes to change his password so voicemail.conf is opened and read into a

Hi, I sent you an email but now when I read it again, it looks like there were some mistakes in it... Please ignore that and address only the following message: Hi, I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but I really couldn't find it anywhere on the web and if you could only provide me with a quick hint, it would be really helpful! I'm experiencing the following problem

Hey list, I have a problem when I host 2 SIP-accounts on the same Asterisk-server. Asterisk picks out the SIP-account on alphabetic order A --> Z. In my sip.conf : register => user1:passwd1 at server/user1 register => user2:passwd2 at server/user2 [YOCAN-3starsnet] type=peer host=server username=user1 secret=passwd1 fromuser=user1 accountcode=user1_in [ITCENTER-3starsnet] type=peer