similar to: noob question about mock

So, you have to have a full i386 build root to build i386 arch packages .. then only a subset of those built packages are actually used as multilib packages for x86_64. as Nux! said, you have to use the i386 distro to build those. The mock configs we use to build live here: https://git.centos.org/tree/sig-core!bld-seven.git/master/mock Obviously, you would need to modify them for your setup.

On 05/20/2018 07:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > So, you have to have a full i386 build root to build i386 arch packages > .. then only a subset of those built packages are actually used as > multilib packages for x86_64. > > as Nux! said, you have to use the i386 distro to build those. > I have the problem, that in mock shell the file /etc/rpm/macros.dist has a wrong

This might be an embarrassingly simple question. How are people building multi-arch library packages on CentOS 7? On older releases one could "mock -r epel-6-i386" and "mock -r epel-6-x86_64" to build a library twice. With no 32-bit release, there's no epel-7-i386 target for mock. Specifying --target=i386 or --arch-i386 both fail. Do we have to set up the

Hello list, I'm currently trying to build the i686 version of http://vault.centos.org/7.5.1804/os/Source/SPackages/nss-util-3.34.0-2.el7.src.rpm The x86_86 version works with mock, but I cannot figure out how to build the i686 version. best regards, Martin

Hi. I am trying to use Mock to rebuild a .src.rpm file I have made for PHP 5.3.8 (for Centos6) I have managed to install deps fine with mock. When I try to rebuild the package though I get. (from build.log) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + cat /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 /usr/share/aclocal/ltoptions.m4

Hi, Here's how my epel-7-i386.cfg mock file looks like: http://fpaste.org/164110/19877702/raw/ Do note the 32bit packages are unofficial and unsupported. RedHat does not support 32bit in EL7. HTH Lucian Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> 12/30/14 to CentOS On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 01/30/2015 11:56 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >

On 8/7/19 8:02 AM, isdtor wrote: > isdtor writes: > >>>> Can I really be the only user of Mate on Centos 7?? >>> No, definitely not. I use MATE on C7, because Gnome is, how do I >>> say this politely..., um, horrible. Not a KDE fan either. >>> >>> Gnome-2.x wasn't broken, didn't need to be thrown away and >>> replaced by

Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are just the ones from EPEL anyway). On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Hello, > > That's great, I know many people were looking for this. > > Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs? > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux!

Hello guys... I compiled inside of "mock" libdrm 2.67 mesa 11.2.1 ati 7.6.1 mockbuild says: libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK installed packaged: xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos @local-drivers OK libdrm.x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK

When building packages in mock lately I see this a lot: error: Macro %py2_install has unterminated body Only started within last month, as far as I can tell the build actually finishes just fine. cause?

Shouldn't be anything overwriting Base...what do you think does so? On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Ah, ok. I was wondering how you managed to build that, because when I > tried it did not work, but I see you have backported also other bits and > bobs. > If those overwrite Base, perhaps add a warning of sorts. > > -- > Sent from

Hi, I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf repo. I have the following in the mock config template: [local-repo] name=my-Local baseurl=http://yumrepo.example.com/yum-repository/local/centos/8/x86_64/ failovermethod=priority skip_if_unavailable=False When I try to run mock I get the following error: (vgeppetto3 pts18) $ mock -v -r epel-8-x86_64

Hi, all! How to setup own i686 mock for CentOS7? Or, is there any public i686 repo for CentOS7? I found i686 repo available in internal CentOS building environment, from a root.log from a mock build result[1]. [1] http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-updates/glibc/20141218212615/2.17-55.el7_0.3.i386/root.log Cheers, -robin

Just started using mock to rebuild some srpms. I have two I want to rebuild, problem is the first creates a dep that is required by the second. Is there an automated way to populate an additional repo/cache that mock would look at when building the second so I could queue both? Although I haven't tried, I presume I could drop the output from the first build into a dir, createrepo it and add

Morning, somehow the upgrade to 4.4 broke mock on my system: | [angenenr at shutdown SPECS]$mock -r c3-i386 /home/angenenr/redhat/SRPMS/apache-ssl-2.8.28-2el4.src.rpm | init | clean | prep | This may take a while | Could not find useradd in chroot, maybe the install failed? Nope, it's not the config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'groupinstall build' issue, as I'm still

Niki, There are some 32bit RPMs (slightly older) here: http://arrfab.net/attic/RPMS/7/x86_64/ HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ned Slider" <ned at unixmail.co.uk> > To: centos at centos.org > Sent: Saturday, 7 March, 2015 22:45:58 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Running the Wine emulator

Hi, Nux! Can you re-paste this cfg? The url is outdated. - robin On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Hi, > > Here's how my epel-7-i386.cfg mock file looks like: > http://fpaste.org/164110/19877702/raw/ > > Do note the 32bit packages are unofficial and unsupported. RedHat does not > support 32bit in EL7. > > HTH > Lucian >

> > Can I really be the only user of Mate on Centos 7?? > > No, definitely not. I use MATE on C7, because Gnome is, how do I > say this politely..., um, horrible. Not a KDE fan either. > > Gnome-2.x wasn't broken, didn't need to be thrown away and > replaced by something completely different. Not broken, but full of bugs that will never get fixed. I did a while

Hi Martin, You need to build a "epel-7-i386" mock profile and use that. Now I call it "epel" so it resembles the default profile, but there is no EPEL 32bit for EL7. There is a 32bit CentOS 7 tree here http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/os/i386/ If there are deps required and are not there you'll need to backport them from Fedora I guess. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant

On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On