similar to: do i need a dedicated ip address for https?

find duplicate filenames in a folder find | perl -ne 's!([^/]+)$!lc $1!e; print if 1 == $seen{$_}++' find duplicate filenames in a folder recursively ? how?

$ ASDF=hello; a=0; a=$(( 70 - $(echo $ASDF | awk '{print length}') )); echo "$a $ASDF"$(for i in {1..$a}; do printf "."; done) 65 hello. $ Why doesn't it print: 65 hello................................................................. What am i missing?

Hi, I have a weird problem woth the time zone on my virtual (goDaddy) dedicated server I had to setup the timezone using system-config-date to GMT+7 i am in NY (GMT-5) when i do GMT-5 i get all the times 2 hours ahead seems like there's something im missing here If i add an event to my web app let's say 7:30 - 8:15 , the only way for me to show it right is GMT+7 can anyone help me

http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=MwDnhknf $ ls -Sl total 461252 -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 111709730 Jan 22 11:06 linux-2.6.37.zip -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 93174605 Jan 22 11:03 linux-2.6.37.tar.gz -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 73552510 Jan 22 11:10 linux-2.6.37.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 66333786 Jan 22 11:16 linux-2.6.37.7z -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 64035788 Jan 22 11:16 linux-2.6.37.tar.7z -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 63480808 Jan 22

Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on: https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere Questions: 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/ 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everywhere" code? 3) Can someone trust this Add-on? Is it safe to install/use? 4) If it's so great why isn't it more prevalent? What's youre

On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Proposal > Re-architect the linker based on the section model where it’s appropriate. > Stop simulating different linker semantics using the Unix model. Instead, directly implement the native behavior. Preface: I have never personally contributed code to LLD, so don’t take anything I’m about to say too seriously.

Hi, I have upgraded to Samba 3.5.6 for Windows 7 Pro compatibility. I am in a test phase to evaluate the behavior of Windows 7 in a Samba PDC environment. I have one Samba server as a PDC with tdbsam backend (no LDAP at all), and I applied the reg and patch as described in the wiki. I have a couple of questions related to Windows 7 : - opening a domain session on the Win7 client takes a

Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable),?BSD?(source code and Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD License?with proprietary parts (source code and chromium 5 beta executable, as it integrates?Adobe Flash Player?10.1[1])[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome in my?interpretation, this means Google Chrome is fully open-source, only the flash player has proprietary

It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing sequence, in a given way: # {START..END..INCREMENT} $ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done Welcome 0 times Welcome 2 times Welcome 4 times Welcome 6 times Welcome 8 times Welcome 10 times $ but what's the "magic" for this? : $ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done Welcome 0 times

$ true && true || echo hi $ true && false || echo hi hi $ false && true || echo hi hi $ false && false || echo hi hi $ ping -W 1 -c 4 google.com >& /dev/null | grep -q "100% packet loss" && ping -W 1 -c 4 www.yahoo.com >& /dev/null | grep -q "100% packet loss" || echo "no internet connection" no internet connection

I use the KB SSL Enforcer https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/flcpelgcagfhfoegekianiofphddckof?hl=en so i could browse the net safer [i mean webserver <-> me] with using https, if available. The problem is: e.g.: facebook... if i go to https://www.facebook.com/ that's ok, it's https. But all the links are "http" on the site.. if i click on a "http"

soruce code of the html file: http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6448/sourcey.png it looks like this in the realiy: http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6448/sourcey.png WHY? if i put it in "< pre >", then it's good. but if it isn't in "< pre >" then the lines ends are random. why dont they end in the same vertical line? thank you, and sorry for askin

Are there any programs blocking ip, and has frequently updated lists, like the peerguardian on windows? sorry for the question, but i looking for this kind of application :O Thank you, and a happy christmas!

I can see, that theres a program that keeps sending packets on port 25: Dec 27 14:11:46 a kernel: [ 6336.992320] O_D_LOG: IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=61533 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=37263 DPT=25 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Dec 27 14:12:01 a kernel: [ 6352.635704] O_D_LOG: IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=55853

hi everyone, i feel like this problem should have come up a thousand times before but can't seem to find anything about on google. i am no expert and i don't know much samba lingo but i hope you understand me. If you open a symlink (or hard link for that matter) in windows (2000) over samba, say a blah.doc file, which looks like -rw-rw-r-- 1 francis galexia 2567 Feb 5 12:33

On Nov 9, 2010, at 7:29 AM, henri wrote: > Hi, > > I have upgraded to Samba 3.5.6 for Windows 7 Pro compatibility. > I am in a test phase to evaluate the behavior of Windows 7 in a Samba PDC > environment. > I have one Samba server as a PDC with tdbsam backend (no LDAP at all), and I > applied the reg and patch as described in the wiki. > > I have a couple of

I'm sorry if my suggestion gave an impression that I disregard the Mach-O port of the LLD linker. I do care about Mach-O. I do not plan to break or remove any functionality from the current Mach-O port of the LLD. I don't propose to remove the atom model from the linker as long as it seems to be a good fit for the port (and looks like it is). As to the proposal to have two different

Hi guys, After working for a long period of time on LLD, I think I found a few things that we should improve in the LLD design for both development ease and runtime performance. I would like to get feedback on this proposal. Thanks! *Problems with the current LLD architecture *The current LLD architecture has, in my opinion, two issues. *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Rui, > > Thank you for clarifying. This is very helpful. > > It’s unfortunate that you’re not seeing benefits from the increased > semantic knowledge the atom based model can provide. I know you’ve explored > the issue thoroughly, though, so I understand why you’re wanting to move a >

Two questions that was not always clear for me [sorry for posting to this list :\]: ############################################################################################## Q1) when cabling, is the color order important? like: straight cabling: A side: white-orange, orange, white-green, blue, white-blue, green, white-brown, brown B side: white-orange, orange, white-green, blue,