similar to: Centos 6 installation memory requirements

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]#

Hi, I have the following error in syslog when starting virt-manager and trying to connect: May 25 16:39:33 sage libvirtd: 16:39:33.525: error : remoteDispatchAuthPolkit:3846 : Policy kit denied action org.libvirt.unix.manage from pid 27509, uid 500, result: 512 I can manually start the kvm guest using virsh, but why can't virt-manager start them? This is on fedora14 x86_64: # rpm

R 2.12.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us test these packages, and move them forward.

Hi, I'm trying to install the newest version of libvirt and libvirt-client from the rpms at ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ on a Fedora 14 machine. The naming of the rpms as "libvirt-0.9.4-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm" suggests that this is exactly the system this was made for, however, installation still does not go smoothly. When I try to install these packages with yum install

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:02:36PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: > Hi again Rich, > > I'm trying to use febootstrap to install either rawhide or f13, > but my attempts are failing. > > $ sudo febootstrap fedora-13 /mnt/jubjub-f > ... > Running rpm_check_debug > ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: > libc.so.6()(64bit) is needed by procmail-3.22-25.fc12.x86_64

R 2.12.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). I did not do this build for Fedora 12, as that release will be End-Of-Life in a month. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in

Folks: samba-common-3.5.8-75.fc13.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients-3.5.8-75.fc13.x86_64 samba-winbind-3.5.8-75.fc13.x86_64 samba-client-3.5.8-75.fc13.x86_64 If I try to join without setting the appropriate WORKGROUP I see: Failed to join domain: Invalid configuration ("workgroup" set to 'WORKGROUP', should be 'FOOBAR') and configuration modification was not requested

Hi, I have a working fc14 install with a few virtual interfaces set up, and just noticed the following in messages: Apr 18 13:07:43 fc14 libvirtd: 13:07:43.155: error : interfaceGetXMLDesc:355 : internal error could not get interface XML description (netcf: NETLINK socket operation failed - couldn't find ifindex for interface `br0:0`) Apr 18 13:07:43 fc14 libvirtd: 13:07:43.165: error :

Good morning, I am trying to install binutils-devel on Centos Linux 5.5 so that we can obtain lib liberty required by the oprofile-0.9.6 Linux profiler. Using root , I enter: yum local install binutils-devel-2.20.51.0.7-6.fc14.i686.rpm. Then I get the message: Public key for binutils-devel-2.20.51.0.7-6.fc14.i686.rpm is not installed. Please tell me where I get the Public key for

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:41 AM, JAMES BOND 123 007 <james123007@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi , > I saw your thread post at > http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/ZvO4jnaavtTfcyqnHoRX > , about problems with XEN 4.0 installation. > I have the same problem and my machine is similar to yours( HP Proliant > DL380G6, 4GB-RAM) This question is better asked on the xen-users list.

1. Attempt to load Nexenta under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 Xen 4.0.1-rc6-pre & 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 on top F13 [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# uname -a Linux fedora13 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:09:30 MSD 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# xm create -c

Is ogg vorbis suitable for vidoe conference in the Intranet environment? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20080603/3b418e0a/attachment.htm

Hello, This is a rather strange problem. I am using the i386 netinstall CD to boot and do a URL (HTTP) install since my machine only has CD drive and can't boot from USB either. During the install, the installer was looking for package authconfig- gtk-6.1.9-1.fc14.i686.rpm and claims that it's missing. I checked the RPMs under packages, and for sure it wasn't there. But look at the

Hi, I am trying to merge Lustre into Fedora 13 kernel (2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686.PAE) I plan to submit the patches and continue to develop features on this kernel. will I get any assistance from the lustre development team. Can I maintain this patch on lustre website ? Regards, Onkar -- **************************************************** A 1965 Ford Mustang is a great car. But if you want to go

Hi, I am trying to merge Lustre into Fedora 13 kernel (2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686.PAE) I plan to submit the patches and continue to develop features on this kernel. will I get any assistance from the lustre development team. Can I maintain this patch on lustre website ? Regards, Onkar -- **************************************************** A 1965 Ford Mustang is a great car. But if you want to go

hi, I tried to make huge page request in Fedora x86_64 PV guest using xen 4.1 unstable and it crashed(crash info given below) I had enabled superpages in config file I had also set hugepages parameter at boot time for the PV Dom U By excuting # cat /proc/mem_info | grep Huge gave me that there are 10 free huge pages available , still the domain crashed. [ 86.403654] BUG: unable to handle

We are testing Samba 3 (and 4) on Fedora Core 13, 10Gbit connection with a Mac OS 10.6.4 system as the client. We will be adding some Windows machines sooner or later with 10Gbit interfaces. We are seeing 100-150MBytes/sec read or write performance between the Mac and the FC13 system over 10Gbit interface but it should be capable of 400-500MBytes/sec. We have a local raid on the FC13 system

I must be missing something obvious. I have a large domU guest: dom0# cat /etc/xen/turing name = "turing" uuid = "8d3383a0-f0ae-f0b1-215d-c2e04115e9fe" maxmem = 40000 memory = 40000 vcpus = 12 bootloader = "/usr/bin/pygrub" kernel = "/var/lib/xen/boot_kernel.nrTJko" ramdisk = "/var/lib/xen/boot_ramdisk.y6Gcn9" extra = "ro

I have Samba Version 3.5.8-74.fc13 (Fedora 13) set up as the PDC for an NT domain. I have several Windows XP Pro and Windows 7 Ultimate workstations as domain members and everything is working fine. Domain users can log-in at the workstations, access shares on the Samba server and the other workstations, etc. I am in the process of adding Samba Version 3.5.8-76.fc14 (Fedora 14) as an additional

On my CentOS 6.3 machine, in /etc/idmapd.conf I've updated the "[Mapping]" section of the config file: Nobody-User = paulbsch Nobody-Group = paulbsch But the mapping is not working. Files still show up as being owned by "nobody". On my Fedora 14 machine, with the exact same changes to /etc/idmapd.conf, the mapping works perfectly and the files show up as being owned by